WEBVTT

00:00:01.690 --> 00:00:05.454
<v Joanne Lockwood>Hello, everyone. My name is Joanne Lockwood and I am your host for the

00:00:05.492 --> 00:00:09.326
<v Joanne Lockwood>Inclusion Bites podcast. In this series, I have interviewed a number of

00:00:09.348 --> 00:00:12.766
<v Joanne Lockwood>amazing people and simply had a conversation around the subject of

00:00:12.788 --> 00:00:16.462
<v Joanne Lockwood>inclusion, belonging and generally making the world a better

00:00:16.516 --> 00:00:20.078
<v Joanne Lockwood>place for everyone to thrive. Like to join me in the

00:00:20.084 --> 00:00:23.114
<v Joanne Lockwood>future? Then please do drop me a line to Joe

00:00:23.242 --> 00:00:26.914
<v Joanne Lockwood>Lockwood at m dot co UK that's

00:00:26.962 --> 00:00:29.750
<v Joanne Lockwood>seechangehappen co UK.

00:00:30.890 --> 00:00:34.658
<v Joanne Lockwood>You can catch up with all of the previous shows on itunes, Spotify

00:00:34.834 --> 00:00:38.678
<v Joanne Lockwood>and the usual places. So plug in your headphones,

00:00:38.854 --> 00:00:41.900
<v Joanne Lockwood>grab a decaf and let's get going.

00:00:42.830 --> 00:00:46.666
<v Joanne Lockwood>Today is Episode 84 with the

00:00:46.688 --> 00:00:50.010
<v Joanne Lockwood>title Unlocking Inclusive Communications.

00:00:50.850 --> 00:00:54.314
<v Joanne Lockwood>And I have the absolute honour and privilege to welcome Suzanne

00:00:54.362 --> 00:00:58.206
<v Joanne Lockwood>Worthheim. Suzanne describes herself as a

00:00:58.228 --> 00:01:01.918
<v Joanne Lockwood>linguistic anthropologist, and when I

00:01:01.924 --> 00:01:05.442
<v Joanne Lockwood>asked Suzanne to describe her superpower, she said that she

00:01:05.496 --> 00:01:08.340
<v Joanne Lockwood>sees patterns that other people don't see.

00:01:08.950 --> 00:01:11.780
<v Joanne Lockwood>Hello, Suzanne. Welcome to the show.

00:01:12.550 --> 00:01:16.338
<v Suzanne Wertheim>Hello, Joanne. It is genuinely a pleasure to be here. I'm

00:01:16.354 --> 00:01:20.146
<v Suzanne Wertheim>really looking forward to this conversation. Likewise. We've had a great chat

00:01:20.178 --> 00:01:23.640
<v Joanne Lockwood>and agreement already, so I'm really, really excited about this.

00:01:24.090 --> 00:01:27.490
<v Joanne Lockwood>So, Suzanne, tell me.

00:01:27.660 --> 00:01:30.700
<v Joanne Lockwood>Unlocking communications. Tell me about that.

00:01:31.310 --> 00:01:35.094
<v Suzanne Wertheim>So I said my superpower

00:01:35.142 --> 00:01:38.810
<v Suzanne Wertheim>was seeing patterns that other people can't see.

00:01:38.960 --> 00:01:42.734
<v Suzanne Wertheim>And this is the superpower of almost everybody who

00:01:42.772 --> 00:01:46.014
<v Suzanne Wertheim>is a linguist or a linguistic anthropologist. And

00:01:46.052 --> 00:01:49.866
<v Suzanne Wertheim>so I am here to talk to people here, generally

00:01:49.898 --> 00:01:53.170
<v Suzanne Wertheim>in the world, and here on this podcast, about how can we be more

00:01:53.240 --> 00:01:56.686
<v Suzanne Wertheim>inclusive in our communications. And inclusive

00:01:56.718 --> 00:02:00.386
<v Suzanne Wertheim>communication, in some respects, is as simple as just Bites

00:02:00.488 --> 00:02:03.886
<v Suzanne Wertheim>modern etiquette. It is 21st century etiquette.

00:02:03.998 --> 00:02:07.682
<v Suzanne Wertheim>But if you want to be more pattern based and more

00:02:07.736 --> 00:02:11.506
<v Suzanne Wertheim>behaviour based, I like to talk about inclusive language and inclusive

00:02:11.538 --> 00:02:15.250
<v Suzanne Wertheim>communication as a way of communicating in a set of behaviours.

00:02:15.330 --> 00:02:17.926
<v Suzanne Wertheim>A lot of people will talk about it as a list of words. Here are

00:02:17.948 --> 00:02:21.034
<v Suzanne Wertheim>bad words and here are good words. But I like to go beyond that and

00:02:21.072 --> 00:02:24.822
<v Suzanne Wertheim>have a very behavioural focus. What are people doing with their language?

00:02:24.966 --> 00:02:27.930
<v Suzanne Wertheim>So when we communicate inclusively,

00:02:28.590 --> 00:02:32.326
<v Suzanne Wertheim>people feel seen and heard and valued.

00:02:32.438 --> 00:02:35.934
<v Suzanne Wertheim>People feel like they are taken into consideration and like they

00:02:35.972 --> 00:02:39.502
<v Suzanne Wertheim>matter. By contrast, when we use what I call

00:02:39.556 --> 00:02:43.234
<v Suzanne Wertheim>problematic language, and there are lots of words that people will use that maybe

00:02:43.272 --> 00:02:46.574
<v Suzanne Wertheim>end with IST or ism, but I like to just call it problematic

00:02:46.622 --> 00:02:50.306
<v Suzanne Wertheim>language. Problematic language comes in many forms and has

00:02:50.328 --> 00:02:53.682
<v Suzanne Wertheim>really negative outcomes. It can

00:02:53.736 --> 00:02:57.346
<v Suzanne Wertheim>damage relationships, it lowers trust, it drives

00:02:57.378 --> 00:03:00.854
<v Suzanne Wertheim>people away and it harms all kinds of relationships. And by

00:03:00.892 --> 00:03:03.080
<v Suzanne Wertheim>relationships, I mean

00:03:04.410 --> 00:03:07.802
<v Suzanne Wertheim>personal relationships. So between family

00:03:07.856 --> 00:03:11.578
<v Suzanne Wertheim>members, friends, colleagues, romantic partners. But I also

00:03:11.664 --> 00:03:15.114
<v Suzanne Wertheim>mean business relationships could

00:03:15.152 --> 00:03:18.982
<v Suzanne Wertheim>be still interpersonal between a recruiter

00:03:19.046 --> 00:03:22.734
<v Suzanne Wertheim>and a client, a recruiter and a candidate. But it could

00:03:22.772 --> 00:03:26.170
<v Suzanne Wertheim>also be a marketing message and an audience

00:03:26.330 --> 00:03:29.690
<v Suzanne Wertheim>or customer experience, software

00:03:29.770 --> 00:03:33.506
<v Suzanne Wertheim>interfaces and clients who become so irritated that

00:03:33.528 --> 00:03:37.314
<v Suzanne Wertheim>they stop using your product. So that's what I mean by patterns. The

00:03:37.352 --> 00:03:40.994
<v Suzanne Wertheim>patterns that I talk about for inclusive communication can be

00:03:41.032 --> 00:03:44.814
<v Suzanne Wertheim>both one on one and media

00:03:44.952 --> 00:03:48.502
<v Suzanne Wertheim>and planned communications that go out and affect many people,

00:03:48.556 --> 00:03:50.440
<v Suzanne Wertheim>sometimes millions of people.

00:03:52.890 --> 00:03:56.646
<v Joanne Lockwood>You're speaking my language. You're speaking my language. One

00:03:56.668 --> 00:04:00.234
<v Joanne Lockwood>thing that people always come to me and say is they're so afraid of getting

00:04:00.272 --> 00:04:03.574
<v Joanne Lockwood>it wrong. And that creates this kind of lean

00:04:03.622 --> 00:04:07.386
<v Joanne Lockwood>back approach to people, because I've never had

00:04:07.408 --> 00:04:11.146
<v Joanne Lockwood>a conversation with someone who is black, I've never had some conversation with

00:04:11.168 --> 00:04:14.926
<v Joanne Lockwood>someone who's transgender or has a disability or what if I say

00:04:14.948 --> 00:04:18.446
<v Joanne Lockwood>the wrong thing? That's the biggest fear people say, is the fear of getting it

00:04:18.468 --> 00:04:21.886
<v Joanne Lockwood>wrong. It is a thing that I hear as

00:04:21.908 --> 00:04:25.490
<v Suzanne Wertheim>well. And it is one of the reasons that I wrote my

00:04:25.560 --> 00:04:29.362
<v Suzanne Wertheim>book, because people would feel

00:04:29.416 --> 00:04:32.980
<v Suzanne Wertheim>better after a workshop with me, and a workshop would be very

00:04:33.430 --> 00:04:37.166
<v Suzanne Wertheim>dedicated to the precise thing. So if you bring me in for recruiters,

00:04:37.198 --> 00:04:40.178
<v Suzanne Wertheim>I'll do inclusive language for recruiters. If you bring me in for sales team, I'll

00:04:40.184 --> 00:04:43.714
<v Suzanne Wertheim>do inclusive language for sales. So we're covering some things, but we have a limited

00:04:43.762 --> 00:04:47.286
<v Suzanne Wertheim>amount of time together. And people would say to me, oh, my people are still

00:04:47.308 --> 00:04:51.158
<v Suzanne Wertheim>nervous, or I'm still nervous, or executives would say to me, there are

00:04:51.164 --> 00:04:54.870
<v Suzanne Wertheim>so many things I'm supposed to cover in an all hands meeting, or when I'm

00:04:54.950 --> 00:04:58.666
<v Suzanne Wertheim>interviewing with somebody and I'm really afraid of getting cancelled. So some people

00:04:58.688 --> 00:05:02.326
<v Suzanne Wertheim>are worried about the wrath of the Internet or getting cancelled. It's more self focused

00:05:02.438 --> 00:05:05.902
<v Suzanne Wertheim>and some people are more worried about hurting somebody else.

00:05:06.036 --> 00:05:09.838
<v Suzanne Wertheim>And so this lack of resources out there has been bothering me for a

00:05:09.844 --> 00:05:13.646
<v Suzanne Wertheim>long time. And so this is why I realised it wasn't a question of

00:05:13.668 --> 00:05:16.962
<v Suzanne Wertheim>ego, where I thought, I simply must write a book, right? It was really

00:05:17.016 --> 00:05:20.834
<v Suzanne Wertheim>more people kept on being so stressed out and

00:05:20.872 --> 00:05:24.114
<v Suzanne Wertheim>so nervous. And when you're paralysed by fear and you don't say

00:05:24.152 --> 00:05:27.494
<v Suzanne Wertheim>anything, sometimes it really lands just the

00:05:27.532 --> 00:05:31.174
<v Suzanne Wertheim>silence is communication in and of itself and it will land very

00:05:31.212 --> 00:05:34.694
<v Suzanne Wertheim>badly on people who expect you to reach out. So this is

00:05:34.732 --> 00:05:38.486
<v Suzanne Wertheim>exactly why I decided to do the work that

00:05:38.508 --> 00:05:40.680
<v Suzanne Wertheim>I do. And I will say that

00:05:42.330 --> 00:05:44.586
<v Suzanne Wertheim>you might have wanted to ask me this later, and I'm just going to say

00:05:44.608 --> 00:05:48.406
<v Suzanne Wertheim>it right now. One of the reasons that my discussion of inclusive language

00:05:48.438 --> 00:05:52.106
<v Suzanne Wertheim>and inclusion communication is different from other people's is I'm the only

00:05:52.128 --> 00:05:55.194
<v Suzanne Wertheim>person I know that starts with behaviour rather than

00:05:55.232 --> 00:05:58.926
<v Suzanne Wertheim>identity. So a lot of people will come and say, there are so

00:05:58.948 --> 00:06:01.838
<v Suzanne Wertheim>many people in the world, I can't keep track of them. I grew up in

00:06:01.844 --> 00:06:05.502
<v Suzanne Wertheim>a very homogeneous way. My workplace is very homogeneous. I don't know. And

00:06:05.556 --> 00:06:09.074
<v Suzanne Wertheim>so it can feel so overwhelming and so exhausting to think

00:06:09.112 --> 00:06:12.946
<v Suzanne Wertheim>about all the people in the world and all the words related to

00:06:12.968 --> 00:06:16.286
<v Suzanne Wertheim>all the people in the world can feel like too much. So that's why I've

00:06:16.318 --> 00:06:19.906
<v Suzanne Wertheim>come up with six principles that allow you to

00:06:20.088 --> 00:06:23.878
<v Suzanne Wertheim>learn more and also make mistakes and correct them in

00:06:23.884 --> 00:06:26.406
<v Suzanne Wertheim>a way that you feel like you always have a North Star. So I'm just

00:06:26.428 --> 00:06:28.586
<v Suzanne Wertheim>going to say them. I'm not going to wait for you to team me up

00:06:28.608 --> 00:06:31.942
<v Suzanne Wertheim>and I'll just say them. They are reflect

00:06:32.006 --> 00:06:35.770
<v Suzanne Wertheim>reality, show respect, draw

00:06:35.840 --> 00:06:39.530
<v Suzanne Wertheim>people in, incorporate other perspectives,

00:06:40.110 --> 00:06:43.840
<v Suzanne Wertheim>prevent erasure and recognise pain points.

00:06:44.210 --> 00:06:47.966
<v Suzanne Wertheim>So these are always that people want themselves to be treated in some

00:06:47.988 --> 00:06:51.614
<v Suzanne Wertheim>respects. They're kind of a golden rule of interactions. And so

00:06:51.652 --> 00:06:55.374
<v Suzanne Wertheim>if you can be precise about when somebody is different from

00:06:55.412 --> 00:06:58.866
<v Suzanne Wertheim>you, how do you show respect or how do you make sure you're not

00:06:58.888 --> 00:07:02.450
<v Suzanne Wertheim>marginalising them or how do you recognise the pain points?

00:07:02.600 --> 00:07:06.418
<v Suzanne Wertheim>These are things that can be small research projects that people can get a

00:07:06.424 --> 00:07:09.734
<v Suzanne Wertheim>grip on rather than this long list of words that

00:07:09.772 --> 00:07:13.574
<v Suzanne Wertheim>feels nebulous. And PS is changing all the time. So you

00:07:13.612 --> 00:07:17.190
<v Suzanne Wertheim>can't just go by memorising lists of words because by the time you memorised it,

00:07:17.260 --> 00:07:20.442
<v Suzanne Wertheim>there's a good chance that some of the things that were okay aren't okay

00:07:20.496 --> 00:07:23.740
<v Suzanne Wertheim>anymore. Yeah, I think you hit

00:07:24.110 --> 00:07:27.306
<v Joanne Lockwood>the nail on the head there, to use a British term, into the person that

00:07:27.328 --> 00:07:30.702
<v Joanne Lockwood>translates into American perfectly well.

00:07:30.756 --> 00:07:34.560
<v Joanne Lockwood>Excellent. I think the key thing for me is

00:07:35.170 --> 00:07:38.986
<v Joanne Lockwood>you actually care about how the other person's

00:07:39.018 --> 00:07:42.686
<v Joanne Lockwood>going to feel when you talk to them. I think you

00:07:42.708 --> 00:07:46.114
<v Joanne Lockwood>mentioned it in respect and the other elements of your six points, but if I

00:07:46.152 --> 00:07:49.906
<v Joanne Lockwood>have enough care about your feelings, your

00:07:50.008 --> 00:07:53.838
<v Joanne Lockwood>needs, your use the word identity, if you like, your lived

00:07:53.854 --> 00:07:57.554
<v Joanne Lockwood>experience, what matters to you, what makes you happy, what makes you sad. If I

00:07:57.592 --> 00:08:01.202
<v Joanne Lockwood>care deeply about that, I want a positive communication,

00:08:01.266 --> 00:08:04.946
<v Joanne Lockwood>I want a positive outcome from our conversation, then I think that's

00:08:04.978 --> 00:08:08.454
<v Joanne Lockwood>the basis then everything builds on the fact that I want this to go well.

00:08:08.572 --> 00:08:11.938
<v Joanne Lockwood>And if I don't know all the, as you say, every single word

00:08:12.124 --> 00:08:14.986
<v Joanne Lockwood>in the dictionary, I don't have to know every single word, I just have to

00:08:15.008 --> 00:08:18.646
<v Joanne Lockwood>know that I will not always get it right. And I appreciate

00:08:18.678 --> 00:08:22.394
<v Joanne Lockwood>that intent isn't everything. The impact kicks in there

00:08:22.432 --> 00:08:26.190
<v Joanne Lockwood>and bit of accountability as well, making sure I own my words. But

00:08:26.260 --> 00:08:30.094
<v Joanne Lockwood>the important thing there is I have to really care that I want

00:08:30.132 --> 00:08:33.406
<v Joanne Lockwood>you to have a positive experience and for me that's always been the root of

00:08:33.428 --> 00:08:37.060
<v Joanne Lockwood>it. If I care enough, I will do my best to get it right.

00:08:37.910 --> 00:08:41.700
<v Suzanne Wertheim>I think that a combination of caring enough,

00:08:42.230 --> 00:08:45.634
<v Suzanne Wertheim>be open to critical feedback to fix mistakes in the moment

00:08:45.752 --> 00:08:49.542
<v Suzanne Wertheim>and doing some prep work. If you can do those three, then

00:08:49.596 --> 00:08:53.446
<v Suzanne Wertheim>you can have a successful conversation with anybody. I

00:08:53.468 --> 00:08:57.094
<v Suzanne Wertheim>think that there are some people who are on the receiving end of people being

00:08:57.132 --> 00:09:00.466
<v Suzanne Wertheim>ignorant about what their lived experience is to the point where it's

00:09:00.498 --> 00:09:04.266
<v Suzanne Wertheim>exhausting, right? So I don't want to just say that if

00:09:04.288 --> 00:09:07.882
<v Suzanne Wertheim>you say to somebody, well, just educate me, or if I say a wrong

00:09:07.936 --> 00:09:11.650
<v Suzanne Wertheim>word, please tell me. Because a lot of times people who are on the receiving

00:09:11.670 --> 00:09:15.470
<v Suzanne Wertheim>end of these things are just done, just done. But

00:09:15.540 --> 00:09:19.246
<v Suzanne Wertheim>if you show that you've already done some homework and

00:09:19.268 --> 00:09:22.894
<v Suzanne Wertheim>you come in and you say, well, I know this, so is this

00:09:22.932 --> 00:09:25.360
<v Suzanne Wertheim>okay? I know I shouldn't say hey guys.

00:09:26.130 --> 00:09:29.874
<v Suzanne Wertheim>So I'm going to say hey folks, or hey people, is that okay

00:09:29.912 --> 00:09:32.946
<v Suzanne Wertheim>with you? Is a story we can talk about a little bit later about a

00:09:32.968 --> 00:09:36.818
<v Suzanne Wertheim>sales call gone wrong and then gone right again. But I think that if you

00:09:36.824 --> 00:09:40.582
<v Suzanne Wertheim>have that combo and show that you've cared enough to put in some work

00:09:40.636 --> 00:09:44.306
<v Suzanne Wertheim>in advance, then people are going to feel they're

00:09:44.338 --> 00:09:47.954
<v Suzanne Wertheim>not educating you from scratch. The burden of education isn't on them. The burden

00:09:48.002 --> 00:09:51.526
<v Suzanne Wertheim>of explaining to you in a way that won't make you upset or angry isn't

00:09:51.558 --> 00:09:55.354
<v Suzanne Wertheim>on them because you've put in that work. And so that's why I

00:09:55.392 --> 00:09:59.206
<v Suzanne Wertheim>like to recommend people certain kinds of homework, like diversifying

00:09:59.238 --> 00:10:02.778
<v Suzanne Wertheim>your social media. So you start even if you have a

00:10:02.784 --> 00:10:06.254
<v Suzanne Wertheim>homogeneous group, because of the ways that

00:10:06.372 --> 00:10:09.262
<v Suzanne Wertheim>things are set up, like even if you grew up in a homogeneous way and

00:10:09.316 --> 00:10:13.146
<v Suzanne Wertheim>your workplace is homogeneous, social media is a gift, is a gift,

00:10:13.178 --> 00:10:16.930
<v Suzanne Wertheim>gift, gift. And you can eavesdrop on conversations without bothering anybody

00:10:17.000 --> 00:10:20.130
<v Suzanne Wertheim>and learn all kinds of things almost by osmosis.

00:10:20.710 --> 00:10:24.466
<v Joanne Lockwood>That's good. What you just said there, again, it resonates because I talk

00:10:24.488 --> 00:10:28.070
<v Joanne Lockwood>a lot about emotional intelligence and cultural intelligence. And

00:10:28.140 --> 00:10:31.826
<v Joanne Lockwood>both of those first steps in both of those emotional

00:10:31.858 --> 00:10:35.618
<v Joanne Lockwood>intelligence is about self awareness, how you come across. And cultural

00:10:35.634 --> 00:10:39.478
<v Joanne Lockwood>intelligence is all around the drive to develop knowledge. So what

00:10:39.484 --> 00:10:43.206
<v Joanne Lockwood>you're saying here is you have to put the legwork in first, don't turn

00:10:43.228 --> 00:10:47.002
<v Joanne Lockwood>up, expect me to be your educator, which I completely resonate with. So

00:10:47.056 --> 00:10:49.706
<v Joanne Lockwood>you've got to have that drive. You've got to care enough about how you come

00:10:49.728 --> 00:10:53.278
<v Joanne Lockwood>across to build the knowledge. And then for the knowledge you build a strategy. So

00:10:53.364 --> 00:10:56.910
<v Joanne Lockwood>yeah, having that groundwork is really important. I concur.

00:10:59.090 --> 00:11:02.766
<v Joanne Lockwood>We have Google in our pockets, don't we? We have millions and billions of

00:11:02.788 --> 00:11:05.874
<v Joanne Lockwood>hours of YouTubes and podcasts and books and

00:11:05.912 --> 00:11:09.534
<v Joanne Lockwood>Amazon. There's not a lot of excuse really for people not to do the basics,

00:11:09.582 --> 00:11:12.980
<v Joanne Lockwood>is there? Well, although I would say that

00:11:13.670 --> 00:11:16.982
<v Suzanne Wertheim>publishing and Hollywood have been real

00:11:17.036 --> 00:11:20.274
<v Suzanne Wertheim>gatekeepers. So you have to have a little bit of critical

00:11:20.322 --> 00:11:24.134
<v Suzanne Wertheim>intelligence and thinking about your sources. Because

00:11:24.332 --> 00:11:28.086
<v Suzanne Wertheim>if you just watch movies about a group, they might not

00:11:28.108 --> 00:11:31.442
<v Suzanne Wertheim>have been made by that group. And if you just read books about a group

00:11:31.516 --> 00:11:35.226
<v Suzanne Wertheim>that might have been written by somebody who's out group. So that's one of the

00:11:35.248 --> 00:11:39.098
<v Suzanne Wertheim>gifts from social media is this decentralisation and the removal of the kind of

00:11:39.104 --> 00:11:42.894
<v Suzanne Wertheim>the gatekeeping. You might not get the knowledge from a book

00:11:42.932 --> 00:11:46.526
<v Suzanne Wertheim>that you need, right? So, for example, I

00:11:46.548 --> 00:11:50.170
<v Suzanne Wertheim>recommend to people, let's just use disability

00:11:50.250 --> 00:11:53.914
<v Suzanne Wertheim>as an example. So people who are perceptibly disabled

00:11:53.962 --> 00:11:57.794
<v Suzanne Wertheim>are low frequency for encounters for many people who

00:11:57.832 --> 00:12:01.490
<v Suzanne Wertheim>are abled out in the world. So it's not frequently that they'll meet somebody

00:12:01.560 --> 00:12:05.294
<v Suzanne Wertheim>who's deaf or hard of hearing or who's in a wheelchair or who's

00:12:05.342 --> 00:12:08.914
<v Suzanne Wertheim>blind, just for example. And so here's a thing where people

00:12:08.952 --> 00:12:11.746
<v Suzanne Wertheim>suddenly are like, oh, my God, I don't know what to say. And they're paralysed

00:12:11.778 --> 00:12:14.390
<v Suzanne Wertheim>or often when we're so self conscious,

00:12:15.370 --> 00:12:18.118
<v Suzanne Wertheim>the last thing that you wanted to come out of your mouth this happens to

00:12:18.124 --> 00:12:21.398
<v Suzanne Wertheim>me, too, when you're nervous, the last thing that you want to come out of

00:12:21.404 --> 00:12:23.858
<v Suzanne Wertheim>your mouth is coming right out of your mouth. And you're like, oh, I can't

00:12:23.874 --> 00:12:27.318
<v Suzanne Wertheim>believe that I said that. So I talk about this sometimes where somebody gets a

00:12:27.324 --> 00:12:30.494
<v Suzanne Wertheim>bad haircut and in your head you're like, don't mention the haircut. Like, don't mention

00:12:30.532 --> 00:12:34.078
<v Suzanne Wertheim>the haircut. And then you're out of your lips comes, oh, you got a

00:12:34.084 --> 00:12:36.926
<v Suzanne Wertheim>haircut. And then you have to make a comment on it when really you just

00:12:36.948 --> 00:12:40.606
<v Suzanne Wertheim>wanted to say nothing. So what I like for the

00:12:40.628 --> 00:12:43.614
<v Suzanne Wertheim>prep is, for example, I don't think in the book you're going to find stuff,

00:12:43.652 --> 00:12:47.202
<v Suzanne Wertheim>but you can just go to Google or any search engine and type

00:12:47.256 --> 00:12:50.894
<v Suzanne Wertheim>in problematic things said to wheelchair users, problematic

00:12:50.942 --> 00:12:54.366
<v Suzanne Wertheim>things said to blind people, problematic things said to deaf

00:12:54.398 --> 00:12:58.102
<v Suzanne Wertheim>people. And they'll just tell you, like, it's just out there. It takes very little

00:12:58.156 --> 00:13:01.234
<v Suzanne Wertheim>time. So I would say even having these kinds of directed

00:13:01.282 --> 00:13:04.200
<v Suzanne Wertheim>searches, if you're prepped and you're like,

00:13:04.650 --> 00:13:08.226
<v Suzanne Wertheim>then you're ready to go, right? So it might seem

00:13:08.258 --> 00:13:12.054
<v Suzanne Wertheim>like you're trying to care about somebody. So let's say there's somebody in a wheelchair,

00:13:12.182 --> 00:13:15.978
<v Suzanne Wertheim>and it might feel caring to you to say, oh, how is

00:13:15.984 --> 00:13:19.446
<v Suzanne Wertheim>it that you're in a wheelchair? But I'm going to tell you that every wheelchair

00:13:19.478 --> 00:13:23.206
<v Suzanne Wertheim>person, every wheelchair person is absolutely not the thing to say. Your wheelchair user

00:13:23.238 --> 00:13:26.826
<v Suzanne Wertheim>is what I was trying to say. Every person in a wheelchair, every wheelchair user

00:13:26.858 --> 00:13:30.478
<v Suzanne Wertheim>that I've talked with or read things by or heard things by,

00:13:30.564 --> 00:13:34.174
<v Suzanne Wertheim>they absolutely have no interest in explaining to you why they

00:13:34.212 --> 00:13:37.906
<v Suzanne Wertheim>are in a wheelchair. And intrusive questions are incredibly common. And

00:13:37.928 --> 00:13:41.474
<v Suzanne Wertheim>so something that might feel like caring or curiosity to

00:13:41.512 --> 00:13:45.282
<v Suzanne Wertheim>you might land as very intrusive and inappropriate to somebody else

00:13:45.336 --> 00:13:48.450
<v Suzanne Wertheim>who's just like, can we just talk about my presentation?

00:13:49.130 --> 00:13:52.806
<v Suzanne Wertheim>Why are we talking about how do I put on pants? Why is

00:13:52.828 --> 00:13:56.626
<v Suzanne Wertheim>this now part of the conversation? We kind of make a bigger

00:13:56.658 --> 00:14:00.234
<v Joanne Lockwood>deal of it than it really is because that's our insecurity, our

00:14:00.272 --> 00:14:03.930
<v Joanne Lockwood>nervousness, whatever it may be. I've got a great friend of mine,

00:14:04.830 --> 00:14:08.266
<v Joanne Lockwood>she's a black woman. She is a wheelchair user. She has

00:14:08.288 --> 00:14:12.106
<v Joanne Lockwood>cerebral palsy at birth. And I

00:14:12.128 --> 00:14:15.934
<v Joanne Lockwood>remember we were going, I think we're going something to eat. And I said, should

00:14:15.972 --> 00:14:19.534
<v Joanne Lockwood>we just walk to the pub or something? And I was going, oh my God.

00:14:19.572 --> 00:14:23.306
<v Joanne Lockwood>I said, Walk to the pub? You're a wheelchair user. And I got all heats

00:14:23.338 --> 00:14:26.850
<v Joanne Lockwood>in my brain. She said, yeah, let's go for a walk, that's fine. And so

00:14:27.000 --> 00:14:30.802
<v Joanne Lockwood>she doesn't use necessarily different

00:14:30.856 --> 00:14:34.674
<v Joanne Lockwood>language. She uses contemporary language around the activity. And

00:14:34.712 --> 00:14:37.780
<v Joanne Lockwood>I was making a bigger deal of it than it was because

00:14:38.310 --> 00:14:41.686
<v Joanne Lockwood>I picked up the word walk and is that ableist? And it turned out that

00:14:41.708 --> 00:14:45.394
<v Joanne Lockwood>I was probably overcooking it. I think sometimes we just got to relax

00:14:45.442 --> 00:14:49.274
<v Joanne Lockwood>and learn about not necessarily taking every

00:14:49.312 --> 00:14:53.146
<v Joanne Lockwood>single word we say too literally and apologise for it, but

00:14:53.168 --> 00:14:56.540
<v Joanne Lockwood>just feel the mood. If they said, oh yeah,

00:14:58.750 --> 00:15:02.106
<v Joanne Lockwood>I've got my powered chair, I'll follow you, whatever, just pick up on their

00:15:02.128 --> 00:15:05.854
<v Joanne Lockwood>language. And I would say that that's the kind of

00:15:05.892 --> 00:15:09.502
<v Suzanne Wertheim>thing over apologising is also a thing that I hear from people

00:15:09.556 --> 00:15:13.290
<v Suzanne Wertheim>from marginalised and underrepresented groups who don't want to feel othered,

00:15:13.370 --> 00:15:16.894
<v Suzanne Wertheim>right? So my third principle is draw people in is the reverse of marginalising,

00:15:16.942 --> 00:15:20.402
<v Suzanne Wertheim>right? So there's a lot of ways that we interact with people that

00:15:20.456 --> 00:15:24.194
<v Suzanne Wertheim>highlight difference. People who feel like they just want

00:15:24.232 --> 00:15:27.540
<v Suzanne Wertheim>to be there in belonging and just treated like everybody else

00:15:28.710 --> 00:15:32.438
<v Suzanne Wertheim>end up feeling very othered. And so over apologising is one of

00:15:32.444 --> 00:15:35.698
<v Suzanne Wertheim>the things that happens. So I was talking to somebody who is non binary

00:15:35.874 --> 00:15:39.686
<v Suzanne Wertheim>and they have a manager who can't figure out

00:15:39.708 --> 00:15:43.498
<v Suzanne Wertheim>pronouns at this point, like figure it out, right? But so

00:15:43.584 --> 00:15:47.098
<v Suzanne Wertheim>in early stages we understand and as a

00:15:47.104 --> 00:15:50.746
<v Suzanne Wertheim>linguist, I'll tell you that pronouns are different from other words and

00:15:50.768 --> 00:15:54.426
<v Suzanne Wertheim>language and we store them in our brain differently and they're grammar

00:15:54.458 --> 00:15:57.982
<v Suzanne Wertheim>words. And it's much harder to shift your use of words in this

00:15:58.036 --> 00:16:01.566
<v Suzanne Wertheim>closed set of grammar words than other words. You

00:16:01.588 --> 00:16:05.266
<v Suzanne Wertheim>wouldn't change numbers very easily or prepositions, right? So there are

00:16:05.288 --> 00:16:08.674
<v Suzanne Wertheim>ways that it is very reasonable to have a

00:16:08.712 --> 00:16:12.546
<v Suzanne Wertheim>struggle with pronouns as people say, oh, actually my pronouns are

00:16:12.568 --> 00:16:16.274
<v Suzanne Wertheim>this. And you haven't had unlike young people today, natively use

00:16:16.312 --> 00:16:20.066
<v Suzanne Wertheim>they them for a single person, right? But for a lot of us who grew

00:16:20.098 --> 00:16:23.926
<v Suzanne Wertheim>up earlier, they them wasn't used for a

00:16:23.948 --> 00:16:27.634
<v Suzanne Wertheim>single unknown person or for plural people, but not for a single known

00:16:27.682 --> 00:16:30.954
<v Suzanne Wertheim>person. So it can be a real struggle against the weight. Of all the times

00:16:30.992 --> 00:16:34.426
<v Suzanne Wertheim>that we've used only she or he to talk about people.

00:16:34.528 --> 00:16:38.102
<v Suzanne Wertheim>So the thing that you do is you just do a minor correction.

00:16:38.246 --> 00:16:42.074
<v Suzanne Wertheim>Oh, yes, so and so she, oh, I'm sorry, they and then you move

00:16:42.112 --> 00:16:45.742
<v Suzanne Wertheim>on. But this manager was, oh my goodness, I'm so sorry,

00:16:45.796 --> 00:16:49.146
<v Suzanne Wertheim>I've done it again. Look at this. I really need to respect that you're

00:16:49.178 --> 00:16:52.554
<v Suzanne Wertheim>nonbinary and on and on and on. So the apology

00:16:52.682 --> 00:16:56.034
<v Suzanne Wertheim>itself was a problem, was

00:16:56.072 --> 00:16:59.906
<v Suzanne Wertheim>problematic language because it was highlighting the otherness. So I think

00:16:59.928 --> 00:17:03.486
<v Suzanne Wertheim>that you can take the cues in the moment here's that emotional

00:17:03.518 --> 00:17:07.298
<v Suzanne Wertheim>intelligence and cultural intelligence. You're talking about having the ability to live in the

00:17:07.304 --> 00:17:11.150
<v Suzanne Wertheim>moment and see, oh, I said walk. Should I apologise? And you could say, oh

00:17:11.160 --> 00:17:14.678
<v Suzanne Wertheim>my God, I said walk. They'll be like, oh, no problem. And then aside, you

00:17:14.684 --> 00:17:17.398
<v Suzanne Wertheim>don't have to worry about walk with them anymore. So these are the kinds of

00:17:17.404 --> 00:17:21.082
<v Suzanne Wertheim>things that you file away in your mental database for

00:17:21.136 --> 00:17:24.410
<v Suzanne Wertheim>interacting with that person. But PS, just because one

00:17:24.560 --> 00:17:28.346
<v Suzanne Wertheim>wheelchair user says it's okay to say walk does not mean you can

00:17:28.368 --> 00:17:31.742
<v Suzanne Wertheim>apply it to everybody. So you got to suss that out person by

00:17:31.796 --> 00:17:35.246
<v Suzanne Wertheim>person. Of course, yeah, my experience is my

00:17:35.268 --> 00:17:38.030
<v Joanne Lockwood>experience and yours differs.

00:17:39.010 --> 00:17:42.814
<v Joanne Lockwood>Talking about misgendering, I misgender myself. I spent 52 years

00:17:42.852 --> 00:17:46.434
<v Joanne Lockwood>of my life using one set of pronouns and referring to myself in a certain

00:17:46.472 --> 00:17:50.260
<v Joanne Lockwood>way. For the last seven so years I've used

00:17:50.790 --> 00:17:54.370
<v Joanne Lockwood>she her and I can't get it right every time.

00:17:54.440 --> 00:17:58.086
<v Joanne Lockwood>And my wife is probably better at than I do. She never gets it

00:17:58.108 --> 00:18:01.746
<v Joanne Lockwood>wrong. But it was our daughter's

00:18:01.778 --> 00:18:05.334
<v Joanne Lockwood>wedding a couple of years ago and I remember and I'm still

00:18:05.372 --> 00:18:09.190
<v Joanne Lockwood>dad and still father to our daughter. So I'm extremely proud of

00:18:09.340 --> 00:18:13.098
<v Joanne Lockwood>that in my life, so I'm not going to lose that. But I remember I

00:18:13.104 --> 00:18:16.806
<v Joanne Lockwood>did the father of the bride speech and it's almost impossible

00:18:16.998 --> 00:18:19.980
<v Joanne Lockwood>to not use male pronouns in this because I said

00:18:20.830 --> 00:18:24.574
<v Joanne Lockwood>there's no prouder moment in a father's life than when he gives

00:18:24.612 --> 00:18:28.382
<v Joanne Lockwood>his daughter away. You try and say that sentence with the word

00:18:28.436 --> 00:18:32.186
<v Joanne Lockwood>she in there instead of he. Linguistically, my head couldn't handle

00:18:32.218 --> 00:18:35.118
<v Joanne Lockwood>it. So I did the entire father of white speech and I said at the

00:18:35.124 --> 00:18:38.786
<v Joanne Lockwood>end of it, I've just systematically misgendered myself four times in this speech, but it

00:18:38.808 --> 00:18:42.546
<v Joanne Lockwood>didn't make sense to me to say it any other way, but that's my

00:18:42.568 --> 00:18:46.130
<v Joanne Lockwood>experience. There are other people who want to identify

00:18:46.790 --> 00:18:50.402
<v Joanne Lockwood>as mum or wife or wherever they do and they use different pronouns.

00:18:50.466 --> 00:18:54.134
<v Joanne Lockwood>As I say, that's my experience. That's the way I

00:18:54.172 --> 00:18:57.586
<v Joanne Lockwood>treat myself and everyone else is different. So, yeah, you

00:18:57.628 --> 00:19:00.220
<v Joanne Lockwood>can't know everybody by knowing one person.

00:19:01.550 --> 00:19:04.140
<v Suzanne Wertheim>And I would add to that that

00:19:05.150 --> 00:19:08.762
<v Suzanne Wertheim>not everybody uses they them pronouns. Some people who

00:19:08.816 --> 00:19:12.378
<v Suzanne Wertheim>are genderqueer or in other way non

00:19:12.394 --> 00:19:15.502
<v Suzanne Wertheim>binary will have pronouns that are very, very low

00:19:15.556 --> 00:19:18.734
<v Suzanne Wertheim>frequency. So this is again why I have these

00:19:18.772 --> 00:19:22.350
<v Suzanne Wertheim>principles. Oh, to show respect and draw in

00:19:22.420 --> 00:19:26.226
<v Suzanne Wertheim>this person right. To show respect for them and draw them in. I

00:19:26.248 --> 00:19:29.890
<v Suzanne Wertheim>have to remember that they're using fay fair, right.

00:19:30.040 --> 00:19:33.330
<v Suzanne Wertheim>So that's also a thing that happens. I think misgendering yourself

00:19:33.400 --> 00:19:37.094
<v Suzanne Wertheim>is okay because of the complexities. I mean, that story

00:19:37.132 --> 00:19:40.982
<v Suzanne Wertheim>is fantastic because it shows the complexities of being

00:19:41.036 --> 00:19:44.614
<v Suzanne Wertheim>very prescriptive about how a person is supposed to be.

00:19:44.812 --> 00:19:48.582
<v Suzanne Wertheim>And let me tell you this, that let's just go to Gatekeeping right?

00:19:48.636 --> 00:19:51.994
<v Suzanne Wertheim>So this happens with disability. I don't know if it happens as much with

00:19:52.032 --> 00:19:55.402
<v Suzanne Wertheim>transgender people, but people who are really trying

00:19:55.456 --> 00:19:59.146
<v Suzanne Wertheim>to walk the walk and be good and learning can get very

00:19:59.328 --> 00:20:03.054
<v Suzanne Wertheim>judgmental and gatekeeping and will lecture people about

00:20:03.092 --> 00:20:06.942
<v Suzanne Wertheim>the language they use for themselves. So I

00:20:06.996 --> 00:20:10.714
<v Suzanne Wertheim>read a few books by disabled

00:20:10.762 --> 00:20:14.570
<v Suzanne Wertheim>activists and in one of them one of the authors

00:20:14.650 --> 00:20:18.178
<v Suzanne Wertheim>talks about how she's a wheelchair user. And so

00:20:18.344 --> 00:20:22.034
<v Suzanne Wertheim>the question of and in the UK and the US, people have landed on different

00:20:22.072 --> 00:20:25.746
<v Suzanne Wertheim>sides of things. Do you say a person with a disability or do you say

00:20:25.768 --> 00:20:29.046
<v Suzanne Wertheim>a disabled person and which one is the right one? So I was listening to

00:20:29.068 --> 00:20:32.806
<v Suzanne Wertheim>somebody recently who does research, disability research, and

00:20:32.828 --> 00:20:36.546
<v Suzanne Wertheim>they publish in English for both a UK and a US audience. And so they're

00:20:36.578 --> 00:20:40.006
<v Suzanne Wertheim>really stymied as to what do I do for the most inclusive choice. And

00:20:40.028 --> 00:20:43.354
<v Suzanne Wertheim>so I think for those, sometimes you have to do a little preface and say,

00:20:43.392 --> 00:20:46.950
<v Suzanne Wertheim>I'm going to be using this language. But in any case, this wheelchair

00:20:47.030 --> 00:20:50.826
<v Suzanne Wertheim>user named Emily Lido said that she

00:20:50.848 --> 00:20:54.654
<v Suzanne Wertheim>had switched over to saying disabled person. And people would say to her,

00:20:54.692 --> 00:20:58.330
<v Suzanne Wertheim>oh no, you should really say person with a disability.

00:20:58.490 --> 00:21:02.142
<v Suzanne Wertheim>And she would say, but I'm disabled. Well, don't talk about yourself like that.

00:21:02.196 --> 00:21:05.938
<v Suzanne Wertheim>I don't think of you as a disabled person, right? So I talk a

00:21:05.944 --> 00:21:09.458
<v Suzanne Wertheim>lot about stigma. Stigma is a thing that happens a lot in

00:21:09.464 --> 00:21:13.186
<v Suzanne Wertheim>society where a group is socially devalued, is marginalised. It's part

00:21:13.208 --> 00:21:16.946
<v Suzanne Wertheim>of what comes with the marginalisation and the lack of access to power is

00:21:16.968 --> 00:21:20.294
<v Suzanne Wertheim>you get a lot of stigma where a group is just seen as less than,

00:21:20.332 --> 00:21:24.134
<v Suzanne Wertheim>and sometimes not just less than, but stigmatised in some

00:21:24.172 --> 00:21:27.798
<v Suzanne Wertheim>way, right? So for example, people with mental health issues, that's very highly

00:21:27.814 --> 00:21:31.434
<v Suzanne Wertheim>stigmatised, people with

00:21:31.472 --> 00:21:35.126
<v Suzanne Wertheim>disabilities, disabled people, depending on what people prefer.

00:21:35.238 --> 00:21:38.874
<v Suzanne Wertheim>And so you can hear that stigma in don't talk about

00:21:38.912 --> 00:21:42.714
<v Suzanne Wertheim>yourself like that or I don't even think of you as disabled. I have black

00:21:42.752 --> 00:21:46.158
<v Suzanne Wertheim>friends who also people have said to them, oh, I don't even think of you

00:21:46.164 --> 00:21:49.726
<v Suzanne Wertheim>as black. And it's like, is that supposed to be a

00:21:49.748 --> 00:21:53.406
<v Suzanne Wertheim>compliment? So there's that kind of gatekeeping. I can imagine a scenario where

00:21:53.428 --> 00:21:57.154
<v Suzanne Wertheim>somebody who's being very assiduous and is just learning how to do

00:21:57.192 --> 00:22:00.914
<v Suzanne Wertheim>pronouns, right, would come up and say, whoo, you really need to get better

00:22:00.952 --> 00:22:04.690
<v Suzanne Wertheim>with your pronouns. I hear people who are in group getting

00:22:04.760 --> 00:22:08.534
<v Suzanne Wertheim>lectured by out group people. And so part of my this

00:22:08.572 --> 00:22:12.022
<v Suzanne Wertheim>can be like a lot of navel gazing, inclusive language. Well, what exact

00:22:12.076 --> 00:22:15.234
<v Suzanne Wertheim>term, what exact term? And my feeling is by showing

00:22:15.282 --> 00:22:19.058
<v Suzanne Wertheim>respect, you use the term that a person prefers. And if you're

00:22:19.074 --> 00:22:22.774
<v Suzanne Wertheim>with a group of people who aren't monolithic, then you start to get complicated

00:22:22.822 --> 00:22:26.154
<v Suzanne Wertheim>and you have to explain yourself a little bit more and say, well, for this

00:22:26.192 --> 00:22:30.010
<v Suzanne Wertheim>group of people, I'm going to use the terminology indigenous, but I understand

00:22:30.080 --> 00:22:33.614
<v Suzanne Wertheim>other people prefer native. Or you like a hyperlink or an

00:22:33.652 --> 00:22:37.374
<v Suzanne Wertheim>Asterisk and a footnote to say, I understand that not

00:22:37.412 --> 00:22:41.166
<v Suzanne Wertheim>everybody likes this term, I'm choosing it for these reasons. So people know that

00:22:41.188 --> 00:22:45.034
<v Suzanne Wertheim>you've put in the work rather than thinking that you're blithely just

00:22:45.092 --> 00:22:48.754
<v Suzanne Wertheim>doing a thing because you don't know any better. Yeah, I completely

00:22:48.792 --> 00:22:52.210
<v Joanne Lockwood>agree with that. And often when I'm doing talks or running

00:22:52.280 --> 00:22:55.678
<v Joanne Lockwood>training, I would tend to use multiple

00:22:55.854 --> 00:22:59.266
<v Joanne Lockwood>ways of describing an identity, a

00:22:59.288 --> 00:23:03.046
<v Joanne Lockwood>characteristic, whatever it may be, in very short successions. So I might say

00:23:03.068 --> 00:23:06.406
<v Joanne Lockwood>a person with a disability or a disabled person, as a matter of fact, in

00:23:06.428 --> 00:23:10.198
<v Joanne Lockwood>a sentence. So acknowledging both terminology and

00:23:10.364 --> 00:23:13.446
<v Joanne Lockwood>sometimes I might even say, I know that people have a different way of describing

00:23:13.478 --> 00:23:16.746
<v Joanne Lockwood>themselves and I don't want to judge. I know that people are very proud of

00:23:16.768 --> 00:23:20.618
<v Joanne Lockwood>being disabled first, and some people prefer to be described as

00:23:20.704 --> 00:23:24.302
<v Joanne Lockwood>person with a disability. Then you meet someone who has

00:23:24.436 --> 00:23:27.630
<v Joanne Lockwood>neurodiversity and they prefer to or they use

00:23:27.700 --> 00:23:31.278
<v Joanne Lockwood>autistic person rather than the person with autism. They're very proud of the

00:23:31.284 --> 00:23:35.106
<v Joanne Lockwood>autism first. So it's a real minefield, as you say, you

00:23:35.128 --> 00:23:38.946
<v Joanne Lockwood>have to be very adaptable, very in tune, do your research or

00:23:38.968 --> 00:23:42.210
<v Joanne Lockwood>at least your basics, as we talked about having that base level of research

00:23:42.280 --> 00:23:43.860
<v Joanne Lockwood>first. And

00:23:45.830 --> 00:23:49.510
<v Joanne Lockwood>where I know there's ambiguity, I try and use

00:23:49.580 --> 00:23:52.600
<v Joanne Lockwood>all the different language I know to sort of say

00:23:53.290 --> 00:23:57.078
<v Joanne Lockwood>I'm aware of the discussion points around this, which is why I

00:23:57.084 --> 00:24:00.006
<v Joanne Lockwood>use both. And if people ask me to clarify, I say, well, I've got some

00:24:00.028 --> 00:24:03.466
<v Joanne Lockwood>great friends who really are proud to be a disabled person. I've got some great

00:24:03.488 --> 00:24:07.302
<v Joanne Lockwood>friends who prefer to be a person with a disability or a wheelchair user

00:24:07.366 --> 00:24:10.678
<v Joanne Lockwood>and those kind of words. So yeah, I think if you coach it in, it's

00:24:10.694 --> 00:24:14.254
<v Joanne Lockwood>not my language, it's words that I'm using that people have explained to me or

00:24:14.292 --> 00:24:18.046
<v Joanne Lockwood>their language. I'm just using the language I've been educated with by

00:24:18.068 --> 00:24:21.806
<v Joanne Lockwood>my friends and my contemporaries. Which language do you

00:24:21.828 --> 00:24:25.620
<v Joanne Lockwood>prefer? Which is your chosen language? And it allows you to show that education

00:24:26.790 --> 00:24:30.622
<v Joanne Lockwood>without assuming or without using your own, if you like bias

00:24:30.686 --> 00:24:34.434
<v Joanne Lockwood>or stereotype about people. And I find so let me

00:24:34.472 --> 00:24:37.990
<v Suzanne Wertheim>throw a term at you, which is metal linguistic. So

00:24:38.060 --> 00:24:41.302
<v Suzanne Wertheim>metal linguistic language is language about

00:24:41.356 --> 00:24:44.962
<v Suzanne Wertheim>language. So I used to say meta, now it's a giant

00:24:45.026 --> 00:24:48.234
<v Suzanne Wertheim>company. So I would say to people, go meta, and now I can't do that

00:24:48.272 --> 00:24:51.706
<v Suzanne Wertheim>anymore. But I like to educate people. So I talked about my

00:24:51.728 --> 00:24:55.322
<v Suzanne Wertheim>superpower being seeing patterns, right? So when

00:24:55.376 --> 00:24:59.194
<v Suzanne Wertheim>you explain patterns to people so they can see

00:24:59.232 --> 00:25:02.794
<v Suzanne Wertheim>them, I think of it as giving people x ray vision. How much can

00:25:02.832 --> 00:25:06.526
<v Suzanne Wertheim>I what is currently opaque to you or feels unrelated? And I can

00:25:06.548 --> 00:25:10.234
<v Suzanne Wertheim>show you that. I've been digging, digging, digging, and there are these skeletal structures

00:25:10.282 --> 00:25:13.486
<v Suzanne Wertheim>that connect them all. Like, how can I show that to you? So if you

00:25:13.508 --> 00:25:17.042
<v Suzanne Wertheim>can name something, if you can talk about it, it allows you to

00:25:17.096 --> 00:25:20.866
<v Suzanne Wertheim>more fluently use metal linguistic language and talk

00:25:20.888 --> 00:25:24.482
<v Suzanne Wertheim>about language. And talking about language is one of the best

00:25:24.536 --> 00:25:28.174
<v Suzanne Wertheim>ways to remove ambiguity and to remove negative

00:25:28.222 --> 00:25:31.638
<v Suzanne Wertheim>feelings and to let people know that you're aware of what you're doing and that

00:25:31.644 --> 00:25:35.334
<v Suzanne Wertheim>you're doing it very intentionally and consciously. And it allows us

00:25:35.372 --> 00:25:39.026
<v Suzanne Wertheim>to bypass hurt feelings and misunderstandings in all

00:25:39.068 --> 00:25:42.614
<v Suzanne Wertheim>kinds of ways. So I do encourage

00:25:42.662 --> 00:25:46.234
<v Suzanne Wertheim>people when it comes to inclusive communication, to really be

00:25:46.272 --> 00:25:49.754
<v Suzanne Wertheim>able to talk about language. And that's why getting educated about how

00:25:49.792 --> 00:25:53.440
<v Suzanne Wertheim>language works really facilitates the ability. Because before

00:25:53.810 --> 00:25:57.486
<v Suzanne Wertheim>I said that, I divide language into two

00:25:57.508 --> 00:26:00.474
<v Suzanne Wertheim>sets, or language practises into two sets, there's

00:26:00.522 --> 00:26:03.906
<v Suzanne Wertheim>inclusive language, inclusive communication, and

00:26:04.008 --> 00:26:07.746
<v Suzanne Wertheim>problematic language and problematic communication. Well, a lot

00:26:07.768 --> 00:26:11.486
<v Suzanne Wertheim>of people don't have the terminology for what's

00:26:11.518 --> 00:26:15.238
<v Suzanne Wertheim>going off the rails when communication is problematic, except for the

00:26:15.244 --> 00:26:18.966
<v Suzanne Wertheim>language of social justice or language available to laypeople, which will be

00:26:18.988 --> 00:26:21.522
<v Suzanne Wertheim>terms like sexism, racism,

00:26:21.666 --> 00:26:25.462
<v Suzanne Wertheim>transphobia, homophobic, maybe

00:26:25.516 --> 00:26:29.074
<v Suzanne Wertheim>they'll say it's a microaggression. I find in my

00:26:29.212 --> 00:26:32.774
<v Suzanne Wertheim>many years of experience looking at what people are resistant

00:26:32.822 --> 00:26:36.506
<v Suzanne Wertheim>to and what lands on people, everything I do is designed to

00:26:36.528 --> 00:26:40.138
<v Suzanne Wertheim>bypass resistance and land on people, right, so they can

00:26:40.224 --> 00:26:43.882
<v Suzanne Wertheim>internalise it, take accountability and say, oh, I should make that shift,

00:26:43.946 --> 00:26:47.534
<v Suzanne Wertheim>right? And it's almost always a small shift. I have found that

00:26:47.652 --> 00:26:51.454
<v Suzanne Wertheim>a very strong stress response trigger a resistance trigger is

00:26:51.492 --> 00:26:54.210
<v Suzanne Wertheim>using words like sexism and homophobia,

00:26:54.870 --> 00:26:58.274
<v Suzanne Wertheim>because a person may be coming in with very good

00:26:58.312 --> 00:27:01.842
<v Suzanne Wertheim>intentions and just inadvertently say a thing. Sometimes people are being

00:27:01.896 --> 00:27:05.554
<v Suzanne Wertheim>absolutely not inadvertently problematic, they are purposefully being

00:27:05.592 --> 00:27:08.722
<v Suzanne Wertheim>problematic. And I have to say, I don't have time or energy for those people

00:27:08.776 --> 00:27:12.278
<v Suzanne Wertheim>go pre problematic elsewhere. I think this is the kind of behaviour that can be

00:27:12.284 --> 00:27:15.894
<v Suzanne Wertheim>a fireable offence. Like, I don't have time and energy for you. But if you

00:27:15.932 --> 00:27:19.526
<v Suzanne Wertheim>really are a well intended person who's like, oh, I got to shift my

00:27:19.548 --> 00:27:23.046
<v Suzanne Wertheim>attention to impact, then I have to say that you can't

00:27:23.158 --> 00:27:26.874
<v Suzanne Wertheim>use words like sexism or homophobia to tell

00:27:26.912 --> 00:27:30.538
<v Suzanne Wertheim>people when they've said something wrong, because they are going to shut down. They're going

00:27:30.544 --> 00:27:34.302
<v Suzanne Wertheim>to feel very attacked. They're going to get very stuck in their own

00:27:34.436 --> 00:27:38.218
<v Suzanne Wertheim>good intentions. They're going to get hot with shame. They're going to be filled

00:27:38.234 --> 00:27:41.790
<v Suzanne Wertheim>with adrenaline and cortisol, and it might take 48 full hours

00:27:41.860 --> 00:27:45.466
<v Suzanne Wertheim>for those stress chemicals to exit from their bodies. And so that's

00:27:45.498 --> 00:27:49.346
<v Suzanne Wertheim>why another reason why I've devised these principles is if people are going

00:27:49.368 --> 00:27:52.946
<v Suzanne Wertheim>metal linguistic and saying to somebody, hey, I don't think you

00:27:52.968 --> 00:27:56.226
<v Suzanne Wertheim>realised there's this thing that you said or this thing that you wrote and it

00:27:56.248 --> 00:27:59.974
<v Suzanne Wertheim>wasn't the right thing to say, let me explain it.

00:28:00.012 --> 00:28:03.618
<v Suzanne Wertheim>And you can use this violates a principle of inclusive language.

00:28:03.714 --> 00:28:07.366
<v Suzanne Wertheim>It doesn't reflect. Reality because you've acted as if there are no

00:28:07.388 --> 00:28:11.206
<v Suzanne Wertheim>non binary people in the world when you said your husband or wife. And

00:28:11.228 --> 00:28:15.002
<v Suzanne Wertheim>so you've got to switch over to spouse and partner because non binary people

00:28:15.056 --> 00:28:18.474
<v Suzanne Wertheim>exist. And so we need to reflect reality that

00:28:18.512 --> 00:28:21.710
<v Suzanne Wertheim>lands a lot better with people

00:28:21.860 --> 00:28:25.562
<v Suzanne Wertheim>than using the language of social justice,

00:28:25.626 --> 00:28:29.390
<v Suzanne Wertheim>which may be merited, but doesn't land

00:28:29.460 --> 00:28:32.958
<v Suzanne Wertheim>well with almost anybody. It's the calling it out

00:28:33.044 --> 00:28:36.658
<v Joanne Lockwood>versus calling it in. It's the educational element, as you say.

00:28:36.744 --> 00:28:40.526
<v Joanne Lockwood>If you start using words like privilege and the other social justice

00:28:40.558 --> 00:28:44.190
<v Joanne Lockwood>words, people who hold those privileges, the majority,

00:28:44.350 --> 00:28:48.034
<v Joanne Lockwood>as you say, tend to shut down. And I'm a great believer that we need

00:28:48.072 --> 00:28:51.746
<v Joanne Lockwood>to collaborate rather than attack each other because what happens when privilege

00:28:51.778 --> 00:28:55.430
<v Joanne Lockwood>gets attacked, it pulls the drawbridge up, it starts throwing rocks at you from

00:28:55.500 --> 00:28:58.838
<v Joanne Lockwood>the ramparts and you don't get anywhere. All you end up doing is having an

00:28:58.844 --> 00:29:02.666
<v Joanne Lockwood>argument amongst yourselves, attacking the castle until we've really got

00:29:02.688 --> 00:29:06.502
<v Joanne Lockwood>to try and lower the drawbridge, lower the heat, lower the temperature

00:29:06.566 --> 00:29:10.138
<v Joanne Lockwood>and have these she say inclusion conversations where

00:29:10.224 --> 00:29:13.878
<v Joanne Lockwood>you're educating whilst pointing out a better way, rather

00:29:13.904 --> 00:29:16.942
<v Joanne Lockwood>than just you're wrong. As soon as you put the hand up or the stop

00:29:16.996 --> 00:29:20.826
<v Joanne Lockwood>or the accusation, defences hit and you say the brain chemicals kick

00:29:20.858 --> 00:29:24.514
<v Joanne Lockwood>in, education stops. And I would add to

00:29:24.552 --> 00:29:27.874
<v Suzanne Wertheim>that, that in my experience the more granular you

00:29:27.912 --> 00:29:31.726
<v Suzanne Wertheim>go and the more behavioural you are rather than saying you're

00:29:31.758 --> 00:29:35.282
<v Suzanne Wertheim>an x or you're y something that's sort of a large

00:29:35.336 --> 00:29:39.038
<v Suzanne Wertheim>scale label. If you move away from telling somebody that they

00:29:39.064 --> 00:29:42.806
<v Suzanne Wertheim>are something and saying, oh, here's this habit you have, or

00:29:42.828 --> 00:29:45.862
<v Suzanne Wertheim>here's this tick you have, or here's this word that you use if you go

00:29:45.916 --> 00:29:49.542
<v Suzanne Wertheim>granular and you say when you do x, it has this

00:29:49.596 --> 00:29:53.306
<v Suzanne Wertheim>effect. It makes people feel disrespected or it

00:29:53.328 --> 00:29:57.114
<v Suzanne Wertheim>makes people feel erased or you're hitting a pain point. And I don't think you

00:29:57.152 --> 00:30:00.966
<v Suzanne Wertheim>realise that this word is actually painful for people who've had different experiences

00:30:00.998 --> 00:30:04.750
<v Suzanne Wertheim>from you. If that level of granularity where it's very

00:30:04.820 --> 00:30:08.542
<v Suzanne Wertheim>specifically and I recommend in a workshop series, I have the

00:30:08.596 --> 00:30:12.414
<v Suzanne Wertheim>SBI model for telling people when something has gone wrong

00:30:12.452 --> 00:30:15.454
<v Suzanne Wertheim>and I think that's a good part of calling in. So not my model, I

00:30:15.492 --> 00:30:18.706
<v Suzanne Wertheim>forget who came up with it, but I credit them on the handout that I

00:30:18.728 --> 00:30:22.514
<v Suzanne Wertheim>give. But it's situation, behaviour, impact. So if you go

00:30:22.552 --> 00:30:26.386
<v Suzanne Wertheim>very granular and you say, the situation is this you said this thing, or the

00:30:26.408 --> 00:30:30.006
<v Suzanne Wertheim>situation is we were in a conversation and nonbinary people were there, or you sent

00:30:30.028 --> 00:30:33.318
<v Suzanne Wertheim>out a press release and nonbinary people will be reading it, or A range of

00:30:33.324 --> 00:30:37.094
<v Suzanne Wertheim>people will be reading it. The behaviour you used, the phrase husband or

00:30:37.132 --> 00:30:40.870
<v Suzanne Wertheim>wife. And this leaves out non binary people, the impact. People

00:30:40.940 --> 00:30:44.586
<v Suzanne Wertheim>who have nonbinary partners, people who are themselves nonbinary are

00:30:44.608 --> 00:30:47.146
<v Suzanne Wertheim>going to feel like you don't see them, you don't care about them. They're not

00:30:47.168 --> 00:30:50.890
<v Suzanne Wertheim>part of your policy. This thing that you said about you, including benefits

00:30:50.960 --> 00:30:54.666
<v Suzanne Wertheim>or whatever, is something that sounds so mundane, right? We're including benefits. And for

00:30:54.688 --> 00:30:57.486
<v Suzanne Wertheim>people who are married, your husband or wife can blah, blah, blah. Well, what if

00:30:57.508 --> 00:31:01.086
<v Suzanne Wertheim>the husband and wife is not a husband or not a wife? Right, so it

00:31:01.108 --> 00:31:04.574
<v Suzanne Wertheim>can seem so mundane, but people who work for you can still feel

00:31:04.612 --> 00:31:08.186
<v Suzanne Wertheim>so othered or forgotten about. Well, do I count? I'm

00:31:08.218 --> 00:31:11.266
<v Suzanne Wertheim>not a husband and I'm not a wife or my partner isn't a husband or

00:31:11.288 --> 00:31:14.670
<v Suzanne Wertheim>a wife. So if you explain that impact, these people are going to feel othered,

00:31:14.750 --> 00:31:18.066
<v Suzanne Wertheim>they're going to feel sad, they're going to feel disrespected, they're going to feel erased.

00:31:18.178 --> 00:31:21.794
<v Suzanne Wertheim>So if you just make this little switch, everyone's going to feel included.

00:31:21.922 --> 00:31:25.154
<v Suzanne Wertheim>People on ramp onto that much, much better. So that's

00:31:25.202 --> 00:31:28.674
<v Suzanne Wertheim>my I'm going to say something terrible.

00:31:28.802 --> 00:31:32.394
<v Suzanne Wertheim>It's not terrible, but there is a research that

00:31:32.432 --> 00:31:36.086
<v Suzanne Wertheim>shows that if you ask men, this is just going to be male

00:31:36.118 --> 00:31:39.260
<v Suzanne Wertheim>specific. If you ask men, have you ever raped anybody?

00:31:40.430 --> 00:31:43.642
<v Suzanne Wertheim>The vast majority will say no. But if you go

00:31:43.696 --> 00:31:47.278
<v Suzanne Wertheim>granular this is just like anonymous survey work. I believe I have to

00:31:47.284 --> 00:31:50.974
<v Suzanne Wertheim>revisit this study. If you go granular and say, have you ever done

00:31:51.012 --> 00:31:54.734
<v Suzanne Wertheim>behaviour A? Have you ever done behaviour B? Have you ever done behaviour

00:31:54.782 --> 00:31:58.494
<v Suzanne Wertheim>C? And those behaviours are components

00:31:58.542 --> 00:32:02.386
<v Suzanne Wertheim>of non consensual interactions of

00:32:02.408 --> 00:32:06.254
<v Suzanne Wertheim>rape. The number of men who admit to that shoots

00:32:06.302 --> 00:32:10.070
<v Suzanne Wertheim>up by more than 100% of what it was. So people

00:32:10.140 --> 00:32:13.926
<v Suzanne Wertheim>are not this is, to me, sort of an end case, right? But there

00:32:13.948 --> 00:32:17.702
<v Suzanne Wertheim>are ways that how are we making people feel bad and not caring about

00:32:17.756 --> 00:32:21.546
<v Suzanne Wertheim>them? Inclusion language is still on that spectrum. It's still on

00:32:21.568 --> 00:32:25.322
<v Suzanne Wertheim>the spectrum of other kinds of physical attacks, right?

00:32:25.376 --> 00:32:29.066
<v Suzanne Wertheim>It's a verbal attack. So that's really where I take my

00:32:29.088 --> 00:32:32.906
<v Suzanne Wertheim>granularity. Like if it works for getting people to be, if not accountable, than

00:32:32.928 --> 00:32:36.654
<v Suzanne Wertheim>the first step of acknowledging that they've done something. If it works even for

00:32:36.692 --> 00:32:40.106
<v Suzanne Wertheim>something as horrific and stigmatised as sexual assault,

00:32:40.218 --> 00:32:43.714
<v Suzanne Wertheim>then I promise you it's going to work well for getting people in your

00:32:43.752 --> 00:32:46.660
<v Suzanne Wertheim>organisation to be more accountable for their

00:32:48.470 --> 00:32:52.034
<v Suzanne Wertheim>verbal problems they've created. And by the way, I want to say

00:32:52.072 --> 00:32:55.922
<v Suzanne Wertheim>that this is an oral medium, you and I,

00:32:55.976 --> 00:32:59.666
<v Suzanne Wertheim>but anytime I say, speak and say, I am in my head, including

00:32:59.698 --> 00:33:03.542
<v Suzanne Wertheim>sign languages. So I just want to say that everything I'm saying

00:33:03.676 --> 00:33:07.106
<v Suzanne Wertheim>also applies to people who are speakers of sign languages and not just oral

00:33:07.138 --> 00:33:10.726
<v Suzanne Wertheim>languages. That's important to make

00:33:10.748 --> 00:33:14.566
<v Joanne Lockwood>sure we are enunciating looking at people respectful

00:33:14.598 --> 00:33:18.140
<v Joanne Lockwood>of people who have hearing loss or hard of hearing, where

00:33:18.590 --> 00:33:21.994
<v Joanne Lockwood>I see so many speakers on stage, they're turning their head away. They're not looking

00:33:22.032 --> 00:33:25.678
<v Joanne Lockwood>at the audience. So not everybody who is hard of

00:33:25.684 --> 00:33:29.246
<v Joanne Lockwood>hearing lip reads. But there are a number of people who have hearing, who still

00:33:29.268 --> 00:33:32.754
<v Joanne Lockwood>rely on the visual and the audible to better hear the words

00:33:32.792 --> 00:33:35.860
<v Joanne Lockwood>properly. So it's always important to

00:33:37.510 --> 00:33:41.314
<v Joanne Lockwood>be consciously inclusive of your communication, not

00:33:41.352 --> 00:33:45.182
<v Joanne Lockwood>just passively inclusive, because you're talking about

00:33:45.336 --> 00:33:48.642
<v Joanne Lockwood>inclusive communication and problematic

00:33:48.706 --> 00:33:52.360
<v Joanne Lockwood>communication there's. The bit in the middle, really, which is the

00:33:54.650 --> 00:33:58.102
<v Joanne Lockwood>inconsiderate communication is where you're not being passive or

00:33:58.156 --> 00:34:01.974
<v Joanne Lockwood>negative deliberately, you're just not considering. And I think

00:34:02.012 --> 00:34:05.770
<v Joanne Lockwood>part of the for me, part of it is making sure that we're actively thinking

00:34:05.920 --> 00:34:09.738
<v Joanne Lockwood>about your needs as a person. So if I am speaking in

00:34:09.744 --> 00:34:13.466
<v Joanne Lockwood>front of an audience or a workshop, whatever, I'm making sure that

00:34:13.648 --> 00:34:17.306
<v Joanne Lockwood>I cheque with everybody, ask if they have any needs in advance

00:34:17.418 --> 00:34:21.054
<v Joanne Lockwood>and reinforce that whilst I'm wellbeing, is everyone able to hear me

00:34:21.092 --> 00:34:23.879
<v Joanne Lockwood>okay? Is there anything I need to do differently? Can you see everything okay? Do

00:34:23.879 --> 00:34:25.940
<v Joanne Lockwood>you need to come to the front really

00:34:26.390 --> 00:34:30.226
<v Joanne Lockwood>overemphasising and being overly conscious about it

00:34:30.248 --> 00:34:32.770
<v Joanne Lockwood>to make sure that you're not inadvertently

00:34:33.270 --> 00:34:35.800
<v Joanne Lockwood>problematic using your language there?

00:34:36.490 --> 00:34:39.702
<v Suzanne Wertheim>And for my

00:34:39.756 --> 00:34:43.494
<v Suzanne Wertheim>book, I either hired people or quid pro

00:34:43.532 --> 00:34:47.142
<v Suzanne Wertheim>quo people for doing subject matter

00:34:47.196 --> 00:34:51.034
<v Suzanne Wertheim>expert readings of things or lived experience readings of things. So I

00:34:51.072 --> 00:34:54.886
<v Suzanne Wertheim>collaborated with two autistic linguists, getting their PhDs and studying

00:34:54.918 --> 00:34:58.634
<v Suzanne Wertheim>not just autistic, but studying autistic communication. Right. So real

00:34:58.672 --> 00:35:02.458
<v Suzanne Wertheim>subject matter experts to bring in some autistic communications

00:35:02.634 --> 00:35:05.600
<v Suzanne Wertheim>to my book, because

00:35:05.970 --> 00:35:09.214
<v Suzanne Wertheim>historically, I'm so deeply horrified by how my field has

00:35:09.252 --> 00:35:12.654
<v Suzanne Wertheim>marginalised autistic communications and presented things. I very

00:35:12.692 --> 00:35:16.158
<v Suzanne Wertheim>confidently would stand on a stage and say, all people do X. And now I'm

00:35:16.174 --> 00:35:19.986
<v Suzanne Wertheim>like, all holistic people do x all people who aren't there's so

00:35:20.008 --> 00:35:23.854
<v Suzanne Wertheim>many ways all people are marking hierarchies all the time. Gender is incredibly

00:35:23.902 --> 00:35:27.140
<v Suzanne Wertheim>salient and people really care about gender. I'm like, oh,

00:35:28.010 --> 00:35:31.122
<v Suzanne Wertheim>that is really not true for so many autistic

00:35:31.186 --> 00:35:34.854
<v Suzanne Wertheim>communicators. For them, power is not that interesting and

00:35:34.892 --> 00:35:38.074
<v Suzanne Wertheim>gender is not that interesting. Right. So there's so many ways in which I was

00:35:38.112 --> 00:35:41.786
<v Suzanne Wertheim>excluding people, but, oh, I got caught up in the

00:35:41.808 --> 00:35:45.546
<v Suzanne Wertheim>autistic thing. Oh, I hired people to so, a

00:35:45.568 --> 00:35:49.158
<v Suzanne Wertheim>person I hired, he actually very recently passed

00:35:49.174 --> 00:35:52.958
<v Suzanne Wertheim>away, which I am very sad about. He was a leader in

00:35:53.044 --> 00:35:56.266
<v Suzanne Wertheim>a new kind of linguistics called crip linguistics. So they're

00:35:56.298 --> 00:35:59.774
<v Suzanne Wertheim>reclaiming the word crip, which was a very

00:35:59.812 --> 00:36:01.440
<v Suzanne Wertheim>stigmatised word.

00:36:03.890 --> 00:36:07.586
<v Joanne Lockwood>Before. Yeah, definitely. With reclamation. So you take the word that's been

00:36:07.608 --> 00:36:10.946
<v Suzanne Wertheim>used against you and you use it in group and you give it power. Much

00:36:10.968 --> 00:36:14.658
<v Suzanne Wertheim>like queer the N word for some people, or

00:36:14.744 --> 00:36:18.434
<v Suzanne Wertheim>African descent, not all. So that's the process of reclamation. And so

00:36:18.472 --> 00:36:22.274
<v Suzanne Wertheim>in the book, I had asked him to read very carefully. I was so careful,

00:36:22.322 --> 00:36:25.782
<v Suzanne Wertheim>it took so much effort for me to say, okay, you're reading as a black

00:36:25.836 --> 00:36:29.554
<v Suzanne Wertheim>person and a disabled person. Here are the relevant pages. Right. I was so careful

00:36:29.602 --> 00:36:33.018
<v Suzanne Wertheim>for the people doing me this favour. And then he just went and read the

00:36:33.024 --> 00:36:36.634
<v Suzanne Wertheim>whole book, which was good, because he had a lot of comments on

00:36:36.672 --> 00:36:39.910
<v Suzanne Wertheim>stuff, but at the beginning of the book I compare

00:36:40.070 --> 00:36:43.802
<v Suzanne Wertheim>communication event planning to regular event planning. I'm saying,

00:36:43.856 --> 00:36:46.798
<v Suzanne Wertheim>look, if you've ever planned an event, you've had to think about who's coming to

00:36:46.804 --> 00:36:50.634
<v Suzanne Wertheim>the event and think about what their needs are and take them into consideration.

00:36:50.762 --> 00:36:53.726
<v Suzanne Wertheim>A lot of people get so paralysed with fear when it comes to language, but

00:36:53.748 --> 00:36:57.374
<v Suzanne Wertheim>I'm like, this is a transferable skill. Have you planned an event? You can plan

00:36:57.412 --> 00:37:00.179
<v Suzanne Wertheim>a communication event. Do you have to send out a press release? Do you have

00:37:00.179 --> 00:37:03.278
<v Suzanne Wertheim>to do an internal email to the whole company? Are you going to create a

00:37:03.284 --> 00:37:06.802
<v Suzanne Wertheim>video? Like all of these things, especially for planned communications,

00:37:06.866 --> 00:37:10.646
<v Suzanne Wertheim>right? Like, if you can plan a party, you can plan communication, you just need

00:37:10.668 --> 00:37:14.486
<v Suzanne Wertheim>an inclusion checklist. Like you would have a party checklist, right? So in the

00:37:14.508 --> 00:37:18.278
<v Suzanne Wertheim>book I had written, have you ever gone to an event where

00:37:18.284 --> 00:37:21.994
<v Suzanne Wertheim>you felt like you were really taken into consideration, like people had really thought

00:37:22.032 --> 00:37:25.706
<v Suzanne Wertheim>about you and really thought about your needs and you really

00:37:25.728 --> 00:37:29.366
<v Suzanne Wertheim>felt included in the event? And this reviewer, a professor

00:37:29.398 --> 00:37:32.826
<v Suzanne Wertheim>of linguistics, said, I've never been to a non deaf

00:37:32.858 --> 00:37:35.920
<v Suzanne Wertheim>event where I felt this way ever in my life.

00:37:36.370 --> 00:37:39.840
<v Suzanne Wertheim>Ever in my life. He was in his forty s and

00:37:41.410 --> 00:37:45.246
<v Suzanne Wertheim>I honestly teared up. I'm tearing up right now thinking about it, because I

00:37:45.268 --> 00:37:49.086
<v Suzanne Wertheim>had just asked him, out of respect for his fantastic linguistic

00:37:49.118 --> 00:37:52.834
<v Suzanne Wertheim>skills and his knowledge base, right? And I just asked him to read specific

00:37:52.872 --> 00:37:56.626
<v Suzanne Wertheim>pages and then he went and read additional pages because he was curious and

00:37:56.648 --> 00:38:00.194
<v Suzanne Wertheim>then he just put that thing in there and it stopped me. I had to

00:38:00.232 --> 00:38:03.906
<v Suzanne Wertheim>close down and take a walk around the block and just think about I'm

00:38:03.938 --> 00:38:07.206
<v Suzanne Wertheim>very lucky that I was born into the body I was born in, in a

00:38:07.228 --> 00:38:10.954
<v Suzanne Wertheim>lot of ways, right? And it hadn't occurred to me that

00:38:10.992 --> 00:38:14.678
<v Suzanne Wertheim>being born into a body that was hearing and mobile mostly

00:38:14.694 --> 00:38:18.266
<v Suzanne Wertheim>abled I'm not fully abled and I'm not fully neurotypical, which I

00:38:18.288 --> 00:38:21.734
<v Suzanne Wertheim>learned later in life, but I was born into a body

00:38:21.792 --> 00:38:25.438
<v Suzanne Wertheim>that made it so I could very often

00:38:25.524 --> 00:38:29.326
<v Suzanne Wertheim>feel like I belonging in places. And here he had had experiences where

00:38:29.348 --> 00:38:32.974
<v Suzanne Wertheim>unless he was in his specific group, if he was not in

00:38:33.012 --> 00:38:36.642
<v Suzanne Wertheim>his specific, specific group of deaf and hard of hearing people, he

00:38:36.696 --> 00:38:40.338
<v Suzanne Wertheim>never truly felt taking into account. And that was a really

00:38:40.424 --> 00:38:44.260
<v Suzanne Wertheim>brutal place for me to sit and I still sit there sometimes.

00:38:45.370 --> 00:38:49.174
<v Joanne Lockwood>Yeah, that reminds me. I'm a

00:38:49.212 --> 00:38:52.582
<v Joanne Lockwood>member of the Professional Speaking Association in UK and

00:38:52.636 --> 00:38:56.358
<v Joanne Lockwood>Ireland and we organised two sort

00:38:56.364 --> 00:38:59.754
<v Joanne Lockwood>of national events per year and we were

00:38:59.792 --> 00:39:03.146
<v Joanne Lockwood>approached, because I'm on the board, we were approached by

00:39:03.328 --> 00:39:06.700
<v Joanne Lockwood>someone who is neurodiverse and

00:39:07.230 --> 00:39:11.054
<v Joanne Lockwood>they came to us and said it would be better if so they came

00:39:11.092 --> 00:39:14.702
<v Joanne Lockwood>with that. I want to help you improve the event. For

00:39:14.756 --> 00:39:18.174
<v Joanne Lockwood>me, for others who are neurodiverse or

00:39:18.212 --> 00:39:20.990
<v Joanne Lockwood>neurodivergent, some people prefer the term neurodivergent,

00:39:21.810 --> 00:39:25.466
<v Joanne Lockwood>or people who just maybe have some anxiety about walking into spaces

00:39:25.498 --> 00:39:29.234
<v Joanne Lockwood>they've never been to before. It would be better if you

00:39:29.272 --> 00:39:31.954
<v Joanne Lockwood>put chairs at the back of the room so people don't have to walk into

00:39:31.992 --> 00:39:35.698
<v Joanne Lockwood>the space. They can just sneak and sit at the back, become comfortable before they

00:39:35.704 --> 00:39:39.334
<v Joanne Lockwood>find the chair, have walk through videos so that before they

00:39:39.372 --> 00:39:42.598
<v Joanne Lockwood>turn up, they can see the entrance, they can see the walks we had to

00:39:42.604 --> 00:39:46.374
<v Joanne Lockwood>get from A to B. You narrate things

00:39:46.412 --> 00:39:50.026
<v Joanne Lockwood>that are happening now and next, those kind of things, putting good

00:39:50.048 --> 00:39:53.498
<v Joanne Lockwood>signage, having a quiet room. And so we went through this whole

00:39:53.584 --> 00:39:56.540
<v Joanne Lockwood>thing and the feedback we got

00:39:58.990 --> 00:40:02.794
<v Joanne Lockwood>from the delegates who went and we've just run another one two weeks ago,

00:40:02.992 --> 00:40:06.602
<v Joanne Lockwood>was that they found the communication was so powerful

00:40:06.746 --> 00:40:10.334
<v Joanne Lockwood>because they turned up, they knew what they were going to expect. They just seen

00:40:10.372 --> 00:40:13.886
<v Joanne Lockwood>the venue. They knew where the reception was, they knew where the venue was. And

00:40:13.908 --> 00:40:17.554
<v Joanne Lockwood>this is people who cast themselves as neurotypical. So not

00:40:17.592 --> 00:40:21.150
<v Joanne Lockwood>only a lot of the work I do, I'm sure what you do, it's

00:40:21.230 --> 00:40:24.914
<v Joanne Lockwood>what helps the one, she helps the many. And that's what we're doing

00:40:24.952 --> 00:40:28.422
<v Joanne Lockwood>here. We're not saying it's just for you. It's actually we're benefiting the

00:40:28.476 --> 00:40:31.814
<v Joanne Lockwood>entire cohort or the communities that are involved, not

00:40:31.852 --> 00:40:34.790
<v Joanne Lockwood>just providing access for someone who has a disability.

00:40:38.250 --> 00:40:41.578
<v Joanne Lockwood>In my late 50s, I'm not saying I'm getting on, but sometimes I don't want

00:40:41.584 --> 00:40:45.254
<v Joanne Lockwood>to walk up flight stairs. So for me it's important to have an escalator,

00:40:45.302 --> 00:40:48.620
<v Joanne Lockwood>a lift or elevator or something.

00:40:50.110 --> 00:40:53.886
<v Joanne Lockwood>I don't have a disability. There are people who maybe go skiing, break their

00:40:53.908 --> 00:40:57.354
<v Joanne Lockwood>leg. They were okay last week, they're not good this week. So we're providing

00:40:57.402 --> 00:41:01.242
<v Joanne Lockwood>accessible solutions, not just for people who have a lived

00:41:01.306 --> 00:41:05.006
<v Joanne Lockwood>or a born disability. We're providing anyone who comes into that in

00:41:05.028 --> 00:41:08.514
<v Joanne Lockwood>their life. So what you're saying there about your

00:41:08.552 --> 00:41:12.354
<v Joanne Lockwood>examples is about creating solutions for the one that benefit the many.

00:41:12.552 --> 00:41:16.206
<v Joanne Lockwood>And you don't know who that many is. They're just there and they appreciate you've.

00:41:16.238 --> 00:41:19.220
<v Suzanne Wertheim>Cared about say

00:41:19.830 --> 00:41:23.618
<v Suzanne Wertheim>so. A lot of companies don't want to invest in talent retention. I'm

00:41:23.634 --> 00:41:26.326
<v Suzanne Wertheim>just going to put that right up front. I look at where the budgets go,

00:41:26.348 --> 00:41:30.006
<v Suzanne Wertheim>and right now Dei budgets are being slashed. So people are willing to

00:41:30.028 --> 00:41:33.674
<v Suzanne Wertheim>put money into talent acquisition, into client acquisition and

00:41:33.712 --> 00:41:37.478
<v Suzanne Wertheim>client retention. And then there's that quadrant of talent retention where they're

00:41:37.494 --> 00:41:40.086
<v Suzanne Wertheim>like, oh, we don't have the budget, or it's a nice to have. And I'm

00:41:40.118 --> 00:41:43.762
<v Suzanne Wertheim>just like, I'm right now trying to lay out what are the consequences

00:41:43.926 --> 00:41:47.710
<v Suzanne Wertheim>of when you don't put money into workplace culture, because it's very

00:41:47.780 --> 00:41:51.310
<v Suzanne Wertheim>expensive. So I'm here in tech. There's a lot of engineers making

00:41:51.380 --> 00:41:54.798
<v Suzanne Wertheim>200 year dollars.

00:41:54.964 --> 00:41:58.626
<v Suzanne Wertheim>And if you lose them, if you lose a 200K engineer, it's at

00:41:58.648 --> 00:42:02.354
<v Suzanne Wertheim>least 300K. That year to replace them, right? Because

00:42:02.552 --> 00:42:06.246
<v Suzanne Wertheim>of all of the losses. For

00:42:06.268 --> 00:42:08.550
<v Suzanne Wertheim>example, I talk about inclusive meetings.

00:42:12.490 --> 00:42:16.280
<v Suzanne Wertheim>When you're trying to design a meeting that is inclusive for

00:42:16.730 --> 00:42:20.454
<v Suzanne Wertheim>somebody who is autistic, somebody who

00:42:20.492 --> 00:42:24.310
<v Suzanne Wertheim>is a speaker of English as their 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th language,

00:42:24.390 --> 00:42:27.766
<v Suzanne Wertheim>a lot of people are much more multilingual than where you're sitting or where I'm

00:42:27.798 --> 00:42:31.246
<v Suzanne Wertheim>sitting, depending on where you grew up. If you

00:42:31.348 --> 00:42:34.734
<v Suzanne Wertheim>are making inclusive language for people who

00:42:34.772 --> 00:42:35.360
<v Suzanne Wertheim>are

00:42:38.450 --> 00:42:42.078
<v Suzanne Wertheim>inclusive meetings, for people who come from a

00:42:42.084 --> 00:42:45.742
<v Suzanne Wertheim>culture where you have to have everything in order

00:42:45.876 --> 00:42:49.458
<v Suzanne Wertheim>before you say something. So, for example, a lot of Native American

00:42:49.544 --> 00:42:53.106
<v Suzanne Wertheim>cultures here, especially on the West Coast, you're supposed to go off and practise on

00:42:53.128 --> 00:42:56.962
<v Suzanne Wertheim>your own. And it's the height of rudeness to bring something

00:42:57.016 --> 00:43:00.774
<v Suzanne Wertheim>half baked, right? Like, you have to come. So if

00:43:00.812 --> 00:43:04.274
<v Suzanne Wertheim>you do these things for these kinds of cultural diversity and you make inclusive meetings,

00:43:04.322 --> 00:43:07.714
<v Suzanne Wertheim>guess who also benefits? Your introvert white male

00:43:07.762 --> 00:43:11.514
<v Suzanne Wertheim>engineer. Right? There are ways in which people think

00:43:11.552 --> 00:43:15.306
<v Suzanne Wertheim>that the benefit is only for a certain kind of person. And

00:43:15.328 --> 00:43:18.454
<v Suzanne Wertheim>I'm like, everybody wants to work in what I call the optimised

00:43:18.502 --> 00:43:22.218
<v Suzanne Wertheim>workplace, so I just call it the optimised workplace. And I'm like, bias gets in

00:43:22.224 --> 00:43:25.966
<v Suzanne Wertheim>the way. And the optimised workplace is where everyone feels seen, heard, and

00:43:25.988 --> 00:43:29.582
<v Suzanne Wertheim>valued, where they feel like they belong, where they're able to make

00:43:29.636 --> 00:43:33.374
<v Suzanne Wertheim>contributions and aren't blocked, and where they feel safe, right?

00:43:33.412 --> 00:43:37.198
<v Suzanne Wertheim>Psychological safety, it's very basic. And I'm like, guess what? Guess who likes

00:43:37.214 --> 00:43:40.786
<v Suzanne Wertheim>to work? There 100% of people. And my data on

00:43:40.808 --> 00:43:44.414
<v Suzanne Wertheim>optimised workplaces comes from business studies. It doesn't come from dei

00:43:44.462 --> 00:43:48.086
<v Suzanne Wertheim>studies. It's like, oh, here are the best run companies where people really like to

00:43:48.108 --> 00:43:51.874
<v Suzanne Wertheim>work. They've got incredible retention rates, they're incredibly productive, and it aligns

00:43:51.922 --> 00:43:55.030
<v Suzanne Wertheim>100% with diversity, equity, inclusion

00:43:55.930 --> 00:43:57.960
<v Suzanne Wertheim>initiatives. So to me,

00:43:59.930 --> 00:44:03.754
<v Suzanne Wertheim>that's evidence. That's what we call data validation, right? And

00:44:03.792 --> 00:44:07.594
<v Suzanne Wertheim>so people often don't think that way. But what you're talking about is exactly that

00:44:07.632 --> 00:44:11.038
<v Suzanne Wertheim>example, and I'll add another to it. I present a

00:44:11.044 --> 00:44:14.734
<v Suzanne Wertheim>lot right now, much more virtually, but often in

00:44:14.772 --> 00:44:17.534
<v Suzanne Wertheim>person, it's coming back. And

00:44:17.732 --> 00:44:21.374
<v Suzanne Wertheim>recommendations for keynote speaking, they're like, use ten

00:44:21.412 --> 00:44:24.850
<v Suzanne Wertheim>slides maximum. And I'm like, no, because

00:44:25.000 --> 00:44:28.654
<v Suzanne Wertheim>I know a lot of people aren't

00:44:28.702 --> 00:44:32.526
<v Suzanne Wertheim>great with only if you're a speaker of an oral language,

00:44:32.638 --> 00:44:36.318
<v Suzanne Wertheim>it doesn't mean that you're great with only auditory comprehension.

00:44:36.414 --> 00:44:40.086
<v Suzanne Wertheim>And so when I have an important thing to say, those words are on the

00:44:40.108 --> 00:44:43.862
<v Suzanne Wertheim>slide in big letters, high contrast font, black

00:44:43.916 --> 00:44:47.000
<v Suzanne Wertheim>and dark blue on a white background. And

00:44:47.450 --> 00:44:51.286
<v Suzanne Wertheim>people can read them as I'm saying them because those are my punctuation points.

00:44:51.388 --> 00:44:54.858
<v Suzanne Wertheim>So back in early rap and 80s rap, it would be where everybody comes in

00:44:54.864 --> 00:44:57.238
<v Suzanne Wertheim>and says the thing and then you go back to the one person, right? It's

00:44:57.254 --> 00:45:00.540
<v Suzanne Wertheim>kind of doing like a little Beastie Boys moment here. But

00:45:01.070 --> 00:45:04.782
<v Suzanne Wertheim>people are very grateful. People are like, I really understood you

00:45:04.836 --> 00:45:08.014
<v Suzanne Wertheim>in a way that I don't understand a lot of other presenters because I'm thinking

00:45:08.052 --> 00:45:11.726
<v Suzanne Wertheim>about and so many people use closed captions now,

00:45:11.828 --> 00:45:15.126
<v Suzanne Wertheim>right. People have gotten very used to streaming with closed captions

00:45:15.178 --> 00:45:18.786
<v Suzanne Wertheim>because that extra bit of information for language is

00:45:18.808 --> 00:45:22.466
<v Suzanne Wertheim>helping their language processing. So, by the way, what you talked about sounds

00:45:22.568 --> 00:45:26.354
<v Suzanne Wertheim>for me, I can be anxious coming into a new space and everything you

00:45:26.392 --> 00:45:30.182
<v Suzanne Wertheim>said, I'm like, oh, that sounds amazing for coming into a meeting and already

00:45:30.236 --> 00:45:32.738
<v Suzanne Wertheim>knowing where I'm going to sit and stand and I can come in and what's

00:45:32.754 --> 00:45:36.166
<v Suzanne Wertheim>happening next. That's the best. Yeah. And the

00:45:36.188 --> 00:45:39.530
<v Joanne Lockwood>feedback, the quiet room. There were people who just wanted

00:45:39.600 --> 00:45:41.660
<v Joanne Lockwood>quiet. They didn't want to talk to anybody.

00:45:42.670 --> 00:45:46.122
<v Joanne Lockwood>I'm a self confessed and

00:45:46.256 --> 00:45:50.106
<v Joanne Lockwood>out and open introvert. I can do an hour or so. I

00:45:50.128 --> 00:45:53.898
<v Joanne Lockwood>can go full max for an hour, then I need the

00:45:53.904 --> 00:45:57.358
<v Joanne Lockwood>recharge. So I'll just go and lock myself away. It's nice. You haven't got to

00:45:57.364 --> 00:46:01.022
<v Joanne Lockwood>justify yourself or say to people, I don't want to speak. Everyone

00:46:01.076 --> 00:46:04.366
<v Joanne Lockwood>knows if you're in the room, you don't speak. You just have your own little

00:46:04.388 --> 00:46:07.058
<v Joanne Lockwood>space. Play a bit of Candy Crush or something on your phone, do whatever you're

00:46:07.064 --> 00:46:10.450
<v Joanne Lockwood>going to do, just cheque out. And it really is powerful.

00:46:10.870 --> 00:46:14.434
<v Joanne Lockwood>I picking up on what you say about slides. There's a kind of

00:46:14.632 --> 00:46:17.960
<v Joanne Lockwood>a thing around professional speakers, about

00:46:18.890 --> 00:46:22.614
<v Joanne Lockwood>true professional speakers don't need slides, they just stand up on stage and

00:46:22.652 --> 00:46:26.038
<v Joanne Lockwood>it's the power of their voice, the storytelling, and yeah, great,

00:46:26.124 --> 00:46:29.606
<v Joanne Lockwood>brilliant. But I'm a great believer also in, as you

00:46:29.628 --> 00:46:33.146
<v Joanne Lockwood>said, there are people in the audience who will

00:46:33.168 --> 00:46:36.806
<v Joanne Lockwood>zone out. English is not their primary

00:46:36.838 --> 00:46:39.980
<v Joanne Lockwood>language. They'll forget what you're saying or they miss something.

00:46:40.510 --> 00:46:44.126
<v Joanne Lockwood>I'm the same, actually. I was listening to some

00:46:44.148 --> 00:46:47.982
<v Joanne Lockwood>talks at this conference last week, and one person

00:46:48.036 --> 00:46:51.342
<v Joanne Lockwood>was working through this exercise and they had this model called Soap. Soap.

00:46:51.396 --> 00:46:55.246
<v Joanne Lockwood>And they give a little card. You're supposed to write this little

00:46:55.268 --> 00:46:58.286
<v Joanne Lockwood>thing down on the card. Then you had to tick at the end of it.

00:46:58.468 --> 00:47:00.558
<v Joanne Lockwood>Whether it was an S, whether it's no, whether it's a whether it was a

00:47:00.564 --> 00:47:04.318
<v Joanne Lockwood>P. And I kind of zoned out in this talk because I was so

00:47:04.404 --> 00:47:08.214
<v Joanne Lockwood>engrossed in what this person was saying and my mind

00:47:08.252 --> 00:47:11.958
<v Joanne Lockwood>was exploding in different directions. I got to the end, he says, Right, now, I

00:47:11.964 --> 00:47:15.798
<v Joanne Lockwood>want you to do this. I thought okay. And there's nothing on

00:47:15.804 --> 00:47:19.538
<v Joanne Lockwood>the card that says what Soap means. His slide had gone and I'm

00:47:19.554 --> 00:47:23.238
<v Joanne Lockwood>going, so I don't know what I can't remember what it stands for.

00:47:23.324 --> 00:47:26.266
<v Joanne Lockwood>So I went out to ask and said, look, if you're going to commit these

00:47:26.288 --> 00:47:29.514
<v Joanne Lockwood>cards, put it on the back, put it on your slide, do something. Because people

00:47:29.552 --> 00:47:33.146
<v Joanne Lockwood>like me who zone out then realise at the end they need to learn what

00:47:33.168 --> 00:47:36.894
<v Joanne Lockwood>they should missed, can't go back. And another speaker did the same.

00:47:36.932 --> 00:47:40.606
<v Joanne Lockwood>She had an ABCDE model and she put

00:47:40.628 --> 00:47:42.558
<v Joanne Lockwood>a and she put a list of things under the A, then she put a

00:47:42.564 --> 00:47:46.174
<v Joanne Lockwood>list of things under the B. But when she clicked on the B, the A

00:47:46.212 --> 00:47:49.794
<v Joanne Lockwood>ones disappeared. I assisted at the end, I said Brilliant. But I

00:47:49.832 --> 00:47:52.546
<v Joanne Lockwood>zoned out. It wasn't until I got to the end of the E that I

00:47:52.568 --> 00:47:56.286
<v Joanne Lockwood>suddenly thought, I wonder what I said. I wanted to go back, it's

00:47:56.318 --> 00:48:00.166
<v Joanne Lockwood>too late. So I couldn't go back to the A's. I said, what would

00:48:00.188 --> 00:48:03.974
<v Joanne Lockwood>be better if kind of thing is instead of blanket out, just

00:48:04.012 --> 00:48:07.640
<v Joanne Lockwood>grey it out until you have a bright and a dark. So

00:48:08.250 --> 00:48:10.698
<v Joanne Lockwood>you've taken the focus off of it. But for me, I can just go back

00:48:10.704 --> 00:48:14.454
<v Joanne Lockwood>and go, oh yeah, I remember, because my attention span just doesn't

00:48:14.582 --> 00:48:18.406
<v Joanne Lockwood>hold that long. And I learned that about myself last weekend,

00:48:18.438 --> 00:48:22.154
<v Joanne Lockwood>that I was zoning out. It wasn't because I wasn't paying attention, it's because

00:48:22.192 --> 00:48:25.998
<v Joanne Lockwood>what they said sparked me. All these things were firing off

00:48:26.164 --> 00:48:29.998
<v Joanne Lockwood>and I didn't know how to come back. I mean, I

00:48:30.004 --> 00:48:33.726
<v Suzanne Wertheim>wouldn't even call it zoning out, which feels a little too self deprecating to

00:48:33.748 --> 00:48:37.490
<v Suzanne Wertheim>me. I think it's more that they didn't signal to you

00:48:37.640 --> 00:48:40.926
<v Suzanne Wertheim>that this was a thing you were going to have to retain, right? They didn't

00:48:40.958 --> 00:48:44.754
<v Suzanne Wertheim>signal to you, here's a thing, I need you to take

00:48:44.792 --> 00:48:48.150
<v Suzanne Wertheim>this away. And it's too much for people who are so

00:48:48.300 --> 00:48:51.766
<v Suzanne Wertheim>I'll tell you. I'm a

00:48:51.788 --> 00:48:55.542
<v Suzanne Wertheim>professional linguist. I learned two languages from my dissertation, like

00:48:55.596 --> 00:48:59.126
<v Suzanne Wertheim>learned in my twenty s two languages, and then went to Russia for a

00:48:59.148 --> 00:49:02.842
<v Suzanne Wertheim>year and studied how one language was affecting the other in all these different ways,

00:49:02.896 --> 00:49:06.538
<v Suzanne Wertheim>right? And I cannot learn things without

00:49:06.624 --> 00:49:09.418
<v Suzanne Wertheim>visual cues. I would have to write down if there was a new word, I

00:49:09.424 --> 00:49:12.602
<v Suzanne Wertheim>would have to write it down. I remember one time I was with my parents

00:49:12.666 --> 00:49:16.394
<v Suzanne Wertheim>on what's called Navajo reservation, but they prefer

00:49:16.442 --> 00:49:20.174
<v Suzanne Wertheim>the term Dine. And so we were talking and we were

00:49:20.212 --> 00:49:23.914
<v Suzanne Wertheim>supposed to visit a hogan with an elder and I wanted to speak respectfully

00:49:23.962 --> 00:49:27.274
<v Suzanne Wertheim>and I said, can you teach me a few things to say to be respectful?

00:49:27.322 --> 00:49:29.854
<v Suzanne Wertheim>And they said them and I'm like, uh oh. And I found a scrap of

00:49:29.892 --> 00:49:33.018
<v Suzanne Wertheim>paper and a pen and I said, Please tell me again. And then I wrote

00:49:33.034 --> 00:49:36.518
<v Suzanne Wertheim>it down using a phonetic alphabet, and then I was able to say it.

00:49:36.604 --> 00:49:40.438
<v Suzanne Wertheim>But as a professional linguist, a professional language, learner in

00:49:40.444 --> 00:49:43.926
<v Suzanne Wertheim>some respect without a visual cue, I couldn't even do it. And I would say

00:49:43.948 --> 00:49:47.526
<v Suzanne Wertheim>the same about song lyrics. I couldn't tell you what any song is about if

00:49:47.548 --> 00:49:51.238
<v Suzanne Wertheim>it's just going in order. If I don't see it all in one place on

00:49:51.244 --> 00:49:54.474
<v Suzanne Wertheim>a piece of paper, then I'm like, oh, that's what the song is about. But

00:49:54.512 --> 00:49:58.282
<v Suzanne Wertheim>I'm a native speaker of English and some people enunciate well, and

00:49:58.336 --> 00:50:01.854
<v Suzanne Wertheim>I couldn't tell you what almost any song is actually talking about. So I think

00:50:01.892 --> 00:50:05.322
<v Suzanne Wertheim>that for many of us who are processing, if you're processing

00:50:05.386 --> 00:50:09.034
<v Suzanne Wertheim>things through time, if there's temporal distance,

00:50:09.162 --> 00:50:12.906
<v Suzanne Wertheim>that there isn't the same kind of retention, if something is gathered

00:50:12.938 --> 00:50:16.622
<v Suzanne Wertheim>for you with a different kind of input written and you can see it synthesised

00:50:16.686 --> 00:50:20.226
<v Suzanne Wertheim>all in one place. So I

00:50:20.248 --> 00:50:23.986
<v Suzanne Wertheim>reject your zoning out and say that I

00:50:24.008 --> 00:50:27.602
<v Suzanne Wertheim>would say that you were doing what's natural for an engaged audience

00:50:27.666 --> 00:50:31.414
<v Suzanne Wertheim>member, and there needed to be supplemental things if somebody really

00:50:31.452 --> 00:50:35.058
<v Suzanne Wertheim>wanted you to take something and turn it into active knowledge

00:50:35.234 --> 00:50:39.014
<v Suzanne Wertheim>on your behalf. Yeah, I

00:50:39.052 --> 00:50:42.780
<v Joanne Lockwood>take your charitable definition and I agree with you. So absolutely,

00:50:43.150 --> 00:50:46.906
<v Joanne Lockwood>I was using zoning out as my kind of shortcut to how

00:50:46.928 --> 00:50:49.994
<v Joanne Lockwood>I would describe, but you're right, I was probably acting very

00:50:50.032 --> 00:50:53.662
<v Joanne Lockwood>typical in that until I need to remember something

00:50:53.716 --> 00:50:57.198
<v Joanne Lockwood>or until I know I need to remember something, I probably don't. You have to

00:50:57.204 --> 00:51:00.702
<v Joanne Lockwood>punctuate and say this next word is worth

00:51:00.756 --> 00:51:03.950
<v Joanne Lockwood>remembering. It's the other thing, isn't it? If someone

00:51:04.020 --> 00:51:07.354
<v Joanne Lockwood>says, Would you like a cup of coffee,

00:51:07.402 --> 00:51:11.138
<v Joanne Lockwood>Steven? You don't hear, Would you like a cup of coffee? Until the

00:51:11.144 --> 00:51:14.370
<v Joanne Lockwood>word Steven is used. So if you say, Steven,

00:51:14.790 --> 00:51:18.434
<v Joanne Lockwood>would you like a cup of coffee? You know that

00:51:18.552 --> 00:51:22.374
<v Joanne Lockwood>whatever's going to come next is an instruction or a question or something for

00:51:22.412 --> 00:51:25.686
<v Joanne Lockwood>you. So it's about making sure you cite I think you said it

00:51:25.708 --> 00:51:29.526
<v Joanne Lockwood>earlier say something as a warm up before you want to say the

00:51:29.548 --> 00:51:33.274
<v Joanne Lockwood>main point. Otherwise you got to get people back on the page. Right?

00:51:33.392 --> 00:51:36.780
<v Joanne Lockwood>I'm going to say something really interesting now, and this is it,

00:51:37.230 --> 00:51:40.986
<v Joanne Lockwood>okay, I'm back in the room. And I think that's what you're trying to say

00:51:41.008 --> 00:51:44.494
<v Joanne Lockwood>there is you got to give the people that audible or visual cue, the next

00:51:44.532 --> 00:51:48.094
<v Joanne Lockwood>thing that follows is for you. Yeah. And

00:51:48.132 --> 00:51:51.386
<v Suzanne Wertheim>so what I think is also interesting, let me bring it back to inclusive

00:51:51.418 --> 00:51:55.054
<v Suzanne Wertheim>communication in a less hey, if you're a speaker, do these things.

00:51:55.092 --> 00:51:58.098
<v Suzanne Wertheim>Although I completely agree. A lot of people don't get good training in how to

00:51:58.104 --> 00:52:01.694
<v Suzanne Wertheim>speak to people, and then it shows. But bringing it back to inclusive

00:52:01.742 --> 00:52:05.150
<v Suzanne Wertheim>language, there are people who are worried that they're going to sound

00:52:05.320 --> 00:52:09.142
<v Suzanne Wertheim>very woke or not on brand if

00:52:09.196 --> 00:52:12.534
<v Suzanne Wertheim>they use more inclusive substitutes. Right?

00:52:12.652 --> 00:52:16.502
<v Suzanne Wertheim>So I'm on retainer for a financial services company,

00:52:16.556 --> 00:52:20.246
<v Suzanne Wertheim>and they send me things, and so they're like, well, what would you

00:52:20.268 --> 00:52:23.930
<v Suzanne Wertheim>do? And I'm like, but my brand is inclusion, so what's correct

00:52:24.000 --> 00:52:27.642
<v Suzanne Wertheim>for me isn't like, I see you as three years, five years behind

00:52:27.696 --> 00:52:31.146
<v Suzanne Wertheim>me, right? Like, there's stuff that I'm using now that five years from now is

00:52:31.168 --> 00:52:33.726
<v Suzanne Wertheim>okay for you to use, but I think it's too soon for you to use

00:52:33.748 --> 00:52:37.566
<v Suzanne Wertheim>now, given who your audience is. They got 23 million customers or something, right?

00:52:37.588 --> 00:52:41.422
<v Suzanne Wertheim>So I'm like, let's be more cautious. For example,

00:52:41.476 --> 00:52:44.670
<v Suzanne Wertheim>I say to people, like, well, I don't want to sound woke.

00:52:45.250 --> 00:52:48.786
<v Suzanne Wertheim>And I'm like, but you don't have to sound woke to be inclusive. So one

00:52:48.808 --> 00:52:52.626
<v Suzanne Wertheim>thing is here's an important term. Terminological precision is

00:52:52.648 --> 00:52:55.458
<v Suzanne Wertheim>a thing that I said during my book launch a few weeks ago, and a

00:52:55.464 --> 00:52:59.038
<v Suzanne Wertheim>few people came up. So when I'm talking about inclusion language,

00:52:59.134 --> 00:53:02.694
<v Suzanne Wertheim>I'm saying I want you to be precise. And there are times that you're saying

00:53:02.732 --> 00:53:06.118
<v Suzanne Wertheim>things that are actually imprecise. So let's move it to the more precise thing. If

00:53:06.124 --> 00:53:09.938
<v Suzanne Wertheim>you're saying husband and wife, that's imprecise, because there are people who don't

00:53:09.954 --> 00:53:13.686
<v Suzanne Wertheim>fit in those categories. You think you've included everybody who's legally bound

00:53:13.718 --> 00:53:17.146
<v Suzanne Wertheim>to another person in a romantic relationship. And I'm here to say

00:53:17.248 --> 00:53:20.590
<v Suzanne Wertheim>you have been imprecise and you've forgotten people, right? So

00:53:20.660 --> 00:53:24.030
<v Suzanne Wertheim>terminological precision. So people, for example, think

00:53:24.180 --> 00:53:27.966
<v Suzanne Wertheim>that guys includes everybody. And I'm here to tell you that there are

00:53:27.988 --> 00:53:31.658
<v Suzanne Wertheim>semantic tests that show yes for the listener.

00:53:31.834 --> 00:53:35.578
<v Suzanne Wertheim>Joanne is shaking her head saying, Guys, it

00:53:35.604 --> 00:53:39.406
<v Suzanne Wertheim>does not include so. But there are people who are very resistant.

00:53:39.438 --> 00:53:43.186
<v Suzanne Wertheim>And they say to me, guys includes everybody. And I'll say, okay. So

00:53:43.288 --> 00:53:46.722
<v Suzanne Wertheim>I'm going to a bathroom, the loo, as it were,

00:53:46.856 --> 00:53:50.486
<v Suzanne Wertheim>in a restaurant, and I am female, assigned female at

00:53:50.508 --> 00:53:54.294
<v Suzanne Wertheim>birth, female to this day. And the first bathroom door that I

00:53:54.332 --> 00:53:57.846
<v Suzanne Wertheim>see, because I'm here in the US. Says, guys, do I walk into that

00:53:57.868 --> 00:54:01.226
<v Suzanne Wertheim>bathroom and think it's gender inclusive, or do I walk down the hall and look

00:54:01.248 --> 00:54:04.554
<v Suzanne Wertheim>for a bathroom door that says gals or dolls or

00:54:04.592 --> 00:54:08.166
<v Suzanne Wertheim>girls? I'm not walking into the guy's bathroom because I know it's a bathroom

00:54:08.278 --> 00:54:11.498
<v Suzanne Wertheim>designated for people who are understood to be male,

00:54:11.594 --> 00:54:14.942
<v Suzanne Wertheim>right? So I say you don't have to

00:54:14.996 --> 00:54:18.766
<v Suzanne Wertheim>sound super hippie dippy or California woke or

00:54:18.788 --> 00:54:22.638
<v Suzanne Wertheim>whatever. If you say so every time you're going to

00:54:22.644 --> 00:54:26.298
<v Suzanne Wertheim>say guys. Like, let's say you're a manager running a meeting, and every time you're

00:54:26.314 --> 00:54:29.246
<v Suzanne Wertheim>going to say, hey, guys. All right, you guys, all right, guys, let's move to

00:54:29.268 --> 00:54:31.806
<v Suzanne Wertheim>this. I said, you can just switch it up. You don't have to use the

00:54:31.828 --> 00:54:35.510
<v Suzanne Wertheim>same thing. So you can start by saying, hey, everyone, let's start. And

00:54:35.580 --> 00:54:39.286
<v Suzanne Wertheim>okay, team, you did a great job. Okay, folks, let's move on. And he said,

00:54:39.308 --> 00:54:42.930
<v Suzanne Wertheim>you know who's noticed? Nobody's noticed. Nobody's

00:54:43.010 --> 00:54:46.354
<v Suzanne Wertheim>paying attention to the fact nobody's going to. But you know who's

00:54:46.402 --> 00:54:49.766
<v Suzanne Wertheim>eventually going to notice? Like, your non binary or

00:54:49.788 --> 00:54:53.114
<v Suzanne Wertheim>female team members who suddenly realise that

00:54:53.152 --> 00:54:56.858
<v Suzanne Wertheim>they like when they're in a meeting with somebody else who's saying guys all the

00:54:56.864 --> 00:55:00.458
<v Suzanne Wertheim>time, they're like, oh. They're like, oh, mike never says guys,

00:55:00.544 --> 00:55:03.566
<v Suzanne Wertheim>right? So it's going to be some sort of retroactive credit you're going to get,

00:55:03.588 --> 00:55:07.054
<v Suzanne Wertheim>but they're going to just feel better. And to my mind,

00:55:07.172 --> 00:55:10.142
<v Suzanne Wertheim>that's the majority of inclusive language. It's not designed to

00:55:10.196 --> 00:55:14.026
<v Suzanne Wertheim>signal how good a person you are. It's

00:55:14.058 --> 00:55:17.742
<v Suzanne Wertheim>designed to have set things up for comfort,

00:55:17.886 --> 00:55:21.522
<v Suzanne Wertheim>just like all of those careful things to talk

00:55:21.576 --> 00:55:25.198
<v Suzanne Wertheim>you. Through to talk an attendee through what the meeting was going to be.

00:55:25.304 --> 00:55:29.094
<v Suzanne Wertheim>It's the same thing for all of the interactions, whether they're one on one, a

00:55:29.132 --> 00:55:32.550
<v Suzanne Wertheim>meeting, all hands,

00:55:32.620 --> 00:55:36.294
<v Suzanne Wertheim>meeting speech, an

00:55:36.332 --> 00:55:40.054
<v Suzanne Wertheim>email to the entire company, et cetera, a slack communication

00:55:40.102 --> 00:55:43.866
<v Suzanne Wertheim>to everybody. That's why I say communication and language and a set of

00:55:43.888 --> 00:55:47.020
<v Suzanne Wertheim>practises rather than focusing on words.

00:55:47.870 --> 00:55:51.114
<v Joanne Lockwood>Yeah, for sure. What

00:55:51.152 --> 00:55:54.958
<v Joanne Lockwood>I've found is you can just put the full stop earlier in

00:55:54.964 --> 00:55:58.654
<v Joanne Lockwood>the sentence. So instead of good morning, sir. Good evening, sir, you

00:55:58.692 --> 00:56:02.458
<v Joanne Lockwood>just put the full stop after good evening or Good morning. It's easy, just don't

00:56:02.474 --> 00:56:05.966
<v Joanne Lockwood>say anymore. Because our natural politeness, maybe as an

00:56:05.988 --> 00:56:09.602
<v Joanne Lockwood>English speaker, our natural politeness is we want to sort of use this

00:56:09.656 --> 00:56:13.266
<v Joanne Lockwood>familiarity terms, but if you just say good morning, good afternoon, or how are we

00:56:13.288 --> 00:56:17.074
<v Joanne Lockwood>doing? Everything okay with you today? Good morning, everybody. Hi,

00:56:17.112 --> 00:56:20.918
<v Joanne Lockwood>everybody, great to see you here, team. Those kind of

00:56:20.924 --> 00:56:24.646
<v Joanne Lockwood>things are really great ways you say a number of

00:56:24.668 --> 00:56:28.278
<v Joanne Lockwood>times I'm standing on the platform at train station and they say, ladies and

00:56:28.284 --> 00:56:31.580
<v Joanne Lockwood>gentlemen, the train now arriving at platform two is for Cardiff. You go,

00:56:32.190 --> 00:56:35.020
<v Joanne Lockwood>what about my friend? Where are they going to go?

00:56:35.870 --> 00:56:39.626
<v Joanne Lockwood>You're not talking to them. Every time a

00:56:39.648 --> 00:56:43.146
<v Joanne Lockwood>speaker or people are here uses the phrase ladies and gentlemen, I always

00:56:43.168 --> 00:56:46.990
<v Joanne Lockwood>think all the people is excluding or. If you have a slide where you're putting

00:56:47.060 --> 00:56:50.606
<v Joanne Lockwood>stats and demographics and you've just got male and female on it, you think,

00:56:50.628 --> 00:56:53.854
<v Joanne Lockwood>well, even if people who are non binary or gender

00:56:53.902 --> 00:56:55.300
<v Joanne Lockwood>nonconforming are so

00:56:57.270 --> 00:57:00.994
<v Joanne Lockwood>insignificantly represented on the statistic, have you

00:57:01.032 --> 00:57:04.706
<v Joanne Lockwood>stopped you having a column showing zero to at least

00:57:04.728 --> 00:57:08.478
<v Joanne Lockwood>you've thought about it. And what I always say to people is if

00:57:08.504 --> 00:57:12.150
<v Joanne Lockwood>you try Googling, do a Google Image search for guys. If you think

00:57:12.220 --> 00:57:15.878
<v Joanne Lockwood>guys are gender neutral, do a Google Image search and tell me how many people

00:57:15.964 --> 00:57:19.738
<v Joanne Lockwood>don't appear to be men in swimsuits on the

00:57:19.744 --> 00:57:23.466
<v Joanne Lockwood>first five pages. Most of them are men in swimsuits on the first

00:57:23.488 --> 00:57:27.180
<v Joanne Lockwood>five pages. An intriguing result. What I also say is

00:57:28.350 --> 00:57:31.614
<v Suzanne Wertheim>another example I like to give it. We call it a semantic test or

00:57:31.652 --> 00:57:35.114
<v Suzanne Wertheim>heuristic right. So what can you go through and test and see what's the gender

00:57:35.162 --> 00:57:37.600
<v Suzanne Wertheim>reference involved is?

00:57:40.130 --> 00:57:43.454
<v Suzanne Wertheim>Two coworkers, one's moved there recently, and they're both

00:57:43.492 --> 00:57:46.670
<v Suzanne Wertheim>male and they're both

00:57:46.740 --> 00:57:50.546
<v Suzanne Wertheim>straight. And one says to the other, so how many guys have

00:57:50.568 --> 00:57:53.826
<v Suzanne Wertheim>you dated since you moved to town? Right, I know it can be hard to

00:57:53.848 --> 00:57:56.840
<v Suzanne Wertheim>meet people here. It's a small town. Is that like

00:57:58.570 --> 00:58:02.226
<v Suzanne Wertheim>a regular thing to say? Does this person of course it doesn't

00:58:02.258 --> 00:58:06.054
<v Suzanne Wertheim>invoke dating everybody. So a nice

00:58:06.092 --> 00:58:09.302
<v Suzanne Wertheim>example I like to give them. Let's just get historical

00:58:09.366 --> 00:58:13.002
<v Suzanne Wertheim>here. How does it feel when a word has

00:58:13.056 --> 00:58:16.778
<v Suzanne Wertheim>genuinely changed the gender of the kind of person it refers to?

00:58:16.864 --> 00:58:19.734
<v Suzanne Wertheim>Let's use the word girl. So it's

00:58:19.782 --> 00:58:23.382
<v Suzanne Wertheim>1350, and I say girl, and then I say things in English

00:58:23.446 --> 00:58:27.262
<v Suzanne Wertheim>that whatever, I'm not going to try. But so I'm speaking in 1350

00:58:27.316 --> 00:58:29.646
<v Suzanne Wertheim>English and I use girl, and if I write girl, I spell it with a

00:58:29.668 --> 00:58:32.400
<v Suzanne Wertheim>Y and I point to two people.

00:58:33.570 --> 00:58:36.498
<v Suzanne Wertheim>One of them appears to be a young male person and one appears to be

00:58:36.504 --> 00:58:39.826
<v Suzanne Wertheim>a young female person. I can be referring to either because girl in

00:58:39.848 --> 00:58:43.374
<v Suzanne Wertheim>1350 refers to boys and girls. It is gender

00:58:43.422 --> 00:58:46.802
<v Suzanne Wertheim>agnostic. It is what people claim guys is.

00:58:46.936 --> 00:58:50.758
<v Suzanne Wertheim>Girl is absolutely referring to anyone who is a

00:58:50.764 --> 00:58:54.214
<v Suzanne Wertheim>young person. So sometimes you can say girl and mean somebody who is a young

00:58:54.252 --> 00:58:57.974
<v Suzanne Wertheim>male person. But cut to there was a gender shift and so

00:58:58.012 --> 00:59:01.706
<v Suzanne Wertheim>now it refers only to young female people. So we know what it

00:59:01.728 --> 00:59:05.498
<v Suzanne Wertheim>feels like when a word has genuinely changed the reference of

00:59:05.504 --> 00:59:08.970
<v Suzanne Wertheim>its gender, because nobody's going to say girl and think

00:59:09.040 --> 00:59:12.654
<v Suzanne Wertheim>of young male people. Although we're being more careful with gender now.

00:59:12.692 --> 00:59:16.366
<v Suzanne Wertheim>Right, but anyway, but oh, look at that group of girls over there. And

00:59:16.388 --> 00:59:19.774
<v Suzanne Wertheim>it's a group of boys playing football or whatever. Right. And I

00:59:19.812 --> 00:59:23.600
<v Suzanne Wertheim>meant soccer. So anyway,

00:59:25.270 --> 00:59:28.914
<v Suzanne Wertheim>I like that counterpoint. Does guys feel like

00:59:28.952 --> 00:59:32.578
<v Suzanne Wertheim>it's shifted all the way? No. Absolutely. Will it shift in the

00:59:32.584 --> 00:59:34.130
<v Suzanne Wertheim>future? Possibly.

00:59:36.710 --> 00:59:40.130
<v Suzanne Wertheim>Semantic shift is a thing you can look back on, but you can't look. Forward

00:59:40.200 --> 00:59:43.986
<v Joanne Lockwood>at it's most prevalent here in restaurants,

00:59:44.018 --> 00:59:47.154
<v Joanne Lockwood>the meet and greeter tends to say, hi, guys, can I get you a table?

00:59:47.202 --> 00:59:50.854
<v Joanne Lockwood>And it's kind of I don't want to make any stereotypical

00:59:50.902 --> 00:59:54.540
<v Joanne Lockwood>accusation here, but it seems to be imported from

00:59:55.470 --> 00:59:58.700
<v Joanne Lockwood>North America as a kind of a cultural thing. And

00:59:59.150 --> 01:00:02.874
<v Joanne Lockwood>in the UK, we kind of picked up on it and it's as bad

01:00:02.912 --> 01:00:06.734
<v Joanne Lockwood>as I mean, I'm not a big fan of folk or folk and high

01:00:06.772 --> 01:00:10.586
<v Joanne Lockwood>folks and things like that. That's kind of again, it's like forced English.

01:00:10.778 --> 01:00:14.402
<v Joanne Lockwood>You have to try and make the language sound natural and inclusive without it being,

01:00:14.456 --> 01:00:17.614
<v Joanne Lockwood>as you say, woke or deliberately inclusive, just naturally

01:00:17.662 --> 01:00:21.010
<v Joanne Lockwood>inclusive. I think that's I don't see folks,

01:00:21.350 --> 01:00:24.562
<v Suzanne Wertheim>you know, people write to me and they're do I or they ask a question,

01:00:24.696 --> 01:00:28.226
<v Suzanne Wertheim>what do I do about sir and ma'am? Especially people in the American

01:00:28.328 --> 01:00:32.098
<v Suzanne Wertheim>South or people, black Americans are often raised

01:00:32.194 --> 01:00:35.446
<v Suzanne Wertheim>that they have to say sir or ma'am. And I'm like, OOH, we don't have

01:00:35.468 --> 01:00:38.278
<v Suzanne Wertheim>one yet. I'm like, I'm waiting for the young people to come up with a

01:00:38.284 --> 01:00:42.006
<v Suzanne Wertheim>gender neutral alternative. But we don't have one, I said. So you got

01:00:42.028 --> 01:00:44.762
<v Suzanne Wertheim>to maybe do politeness and tone. So if you're going to walk up to somebody

01:00:44.816 --> 01:00:48.538
<v Suzanne Wertheim>on the street, so if there's somebody you know is male and wants to be

01:00:48.544 --> 01:00:51.754
<v Suzanne Wertheim>called sir, then fine, there's someone you know is female and wants to be called

01:00:51.792 --> 01:00:55.642
<v Suzanne Wertheim>ma'am, then fine, or madam, right? But if

01:00:55.696 --> 01:00:58.814
<v Suzanne Wertheim>there's somebody you don't know on the street or the next client or the next

01:00:58.852 --> 01:01:01.886
<v Suzanne Wertheim>customer, you can't do it. So you have to use it. Well, you were saying

01:01:01.908 --> 01:01:05.742
<v Suzanne Wertheim>good morning, right? Instead of sir, just drop it off,

01:01:05.796 --> 01:01:08.818
<v Suzanne Wertheim>right? And you can just say, oh, excuse me. Like, you can try to do

01:01:08.824 --> 01:01:12.114
<v Suzanne Wertheim>it in tone or you can say, oh, I think the person in the green

01:01:12.152 --> 01:01:15.714
<v Suzanne Wertheim>shirt was next. Or instead of saying, Hi, guys, you can say hello,

01:01:15.752 --> 01:01:19.586
<v Suzanne Wertheim>everyone, folks doesn't feel natural for me at all. For some people

01:01:19.608 --> 01:01:23.206
<v Suzanne Wertheim>it's a very natural word. For me it feels very artificial. So I recommend that

01:01:23.228 --> 01:01:27.046
<v Suzanne Wertheim>people use it if it feels good in their mouth, but if it doesn't feel

01:01:27.068 --> 01:01:30.486
<v Suzanne Wertheim>good, dump it like that's. Okay. There's plenty of other things to say.

01:01:30.668 --> 01:01:33.514
<v Joanne Lockwood>It's funny you said that. Describe someone as the person over there in the green

01:01:33.552 --> 01:01:37.178
<v Joanne Lockwood>shirt. I tend to wear a hat. I've got a couple of

01:01:37.184 --> 01:01:40.906
<v Joanne Lockwood>hats, different coloured hats. I tend to wear those when I'm at events and

01:01:40.928 --> 01:01:44.286
<v Joanne Lockwood>speaking and things like that. Because I want to give somebody an easy way to

01:01:44.308 --> 01:01:47.642
<v Joanne Lockwood>describe me rather than get confused by my gender identity

01:01:47.706 --> 01:01:51.118
<v Joanne Lockwood>or use my obvious characteristic as a

01:01:51.124 --> 01:01:54.000
<v Joanne Lockwood>description. The trans woman over there or something,

01:01:54.690 --> 01:01:57.918
<v Joanne Lockwood>I give them the lady in the hat or the person in the hat, or

01:01:57.924 --> 01:02:01.346
<v Joanne Lockwood>the person with the yellow tights, or something like that. So I try and give

01:02:01.368 --> 01:02:04.706
<v Joanne Lockwood>people a very easy way of recognising me and spotting me when I walk in

01:02:04.728 --> 01:02:08.294
<v Joanne Lockwood>the door as part of my personal brand. So it does

01:02:08.332 --> 01:02:12.166
<v Joanne Lockwood>help sometimes to signpost yourself in a way you

01:02:12.188 --> 01:02:15.846
<v Joanne Lockwood>like to be signposted. But I think it's an excellent example

01:02:15.948 --> 01:02:19.606
<v Suzanne Wertheim>of the extra labour that people have to do

01:02:19.708 --> 01:02:22.874
<v Suzanne Wertheim>in order to make sure they're treated well. I think about all the black women

01:02:22.912 --> 01:02:26.714
<v Suzanne Wertheim>I know straightening their hair, for example, or all

01:02:26.752 --> 01:02:30.394
<v Suzanne Wertheim>the work that people do in order to make sure that's

01:02:30.442 --> 01:02:33.950
<v Suzanne Wertheim>your labour to prevent

01:02:34.610 --> 01:02:38.186
<v Suzanne Wertheim>negative things being said, like you're helping people out, but it's

01:02:38.218 --> 01:02:42.062
<v Suzanne Wertheim>also protection for yourself because you've made it easier through your

01:02:42.116 --> 01:02:45.380
<v Suzanne Wertheim>labour. But I long for a world

01:02:45.750 --> 01:02:49.586
<v Suzanne Wertheim>where people already have very fluent ways of

01:02:49.608 --> 01:02:52.994
<v Suzanne Wertheim>referring to a person that they don't have to go right

01:02:53.032 --> 01:02:56.582
<v Suzanne Wertheim>to gender identity and already are

01:02:56.636 --> 01:03:00.486
<v Suzanne Wertheim>thinking maybe gender identity isn't relevant to

01:03:00.508 --> 01:03:03.320
<v Suzanne Wertheim>how I describe a person. Right.

01:03:05.850 --> 01:03:09.414
<v Joanne Lockwood>On that note, it's been an amazing hour having a chat with you

01:03:09.452 --> 01:03:12.778
<v Joanne Lockwood>and obviously the 20 or 30 minutes beforehand in the green room where we just

01:03:12.784 --> 01:03:16.586
<v Joanne Lockwood>got to know each other. Suzanne Wertheim, tell me

01:03:16.608 --> 01:03:19.706
<v Joanne Lockwood>about your book. Tell me about how people can get in contact with you because

01:03:19.728 --> 01:03:23.406
<v Joanne Lockwood>I know the listeners of this show would love to make contact. So

01:03:23.428 --> 01:03:26.880
<v Joanne Lockwood>what's the best way of getting in touch? Sure. So

01:03:27.570 --> 01:03:30.794
<v Suzanne Wertheim>you can find the book. The book is called The Inclusive

01:03:30.922 --> 01:03:34.350
<v Suzanne Wertheim>Language Field Guide. It is available

01:03:34.500 --> 01:03:38.238
<v Suzanne Wertheim>all the places books are sold, including if you're

01:03:38.254 --> 01:03:41.554
<v Suzanne Wertheim>in the UK, there are a few bookshops there that are stocking it in

01:03:41.592 --> 01:03:45.426
<v Suzanne Wertheim>person. Paperback. It is a paperback it is an ebook. And if

01:03:45.448 --> 01:03:48.614
<v Suzanne Wertheim>you thought I have a nice voice, you can listen to it for 7 hours

01:03:48.732 --> 01:03:52.070
<v Suzanne Wertheim>and 56 minutes, narrating the audiobook.

01:03:52.970 --> 01:03:55.814
<v Suzanne Wertheim>Although I do have to warn you, there is a table at the end that

01:03:55.852 --> 01:03:59.398
<v Suzanne Wertheim>I read for 30 minutes. So the audiobook might not be the

01:03:59.404 --> 01:04:03.146
<v Suzanne Wertheim>best might not be the best option. So if

01:04:03.168 --> 01:04:06.954
<v Suzanne Wertheim>you want to find me, the best way to find me is Suzannewortheim.com.

01:04:07.072 --> 01:04:10.906
<v Suzanne Wertheim>If you want to connect with me, you can contact me there. You

01:04:10.928 --> 01:04:14.718
<v Suzanne Wertheim>can sign up for my free newsletter, which I send out twice a

01:04:14.724 --> 01:04:18.382
<v Suzanne Wertheim>month. Once a month, I send out an inclusive language article about

01:04:18.436 --> 01:04:22.026
<v Suzanne Wertheim>something often topical. And once a month I send out an advice

01:04:22.058 --> 01:04:25.886
<v Suzanne Wertheim>column so you can write to me and get free advice. It's fully

01:04:25.918 --> 01:04:29.662
<v Suzanne Wertheim>anonymized. And people I recently covered sir and Ma'am,

01:04:29.726 --> 01:04:33.570
<v Suzanne Wertheim>for example, and people like, I don't know what to do. And

01:04:33.640 --> 01:04:36.786
<v Suzanne Wertheim>people also like to follow me on LinkedIn

01:04:36.978 --> 01:04:40.694
<v Suzanne Wertheim>because I do write articles on

01:04:40.732 --> 01:04:44.534
<v Suzanne Wertheim>topical things. They're often topical in the US, but

01:04:44.572 --> 01:04:48.246
<v Suzanne Wertheim>sometimes they're topical on a more global level. So I

01:04:48.268 --> 01:04:52.018
<v Suzanne Wertheim>will give the analysis and show the patterns that people aren't seeing or give

01:04:52.044 --> 01:04:55.706
<v Suzanne Wertheim>the names for things. Oh, this is an example of inflating language. When the white

01:04:55.728 --> 01:04:59.546
<v Suzanne Wertheim>basketball player did it, nobody complained. And when the black basketball player did

01:04:59.568 --> 01:05:03.374
<v Suzanne Wertheim>it, there was an outrage on Twitter. And so that's a double standard using

01:05:03.412 --> 01:05:07.018
<v Suzanne Wertheim>what I call inflating language, et cetera.

01:05:07.114 --> 01:05:10.734
<v Suzanne Wertheim>So, website LinkedIn and all

01:05:10.772 --> 01:05:14.606
<v Suzanne Wertheim>bookstores. Absolutely. Also, as

01:05:14.628 --> 01:05:18.386
<v Joanne Lockwood>you were talking there, I nipped onto Amazon, into Audible, and I

01:05:18.408 --> 01:05:22.162
<v Joanne Lockwood>just purchased your book using one of my Audible credits.

01:05:22.216 --> 01:05:24.946
<v Joanne Lockwood>So that'll be something I can listen to on the train. So I'm looking forward

01:05:24.968 --> 01:05:28.374
<v Joanne Lockwood>to that. Having chatted for an hour, I'm really

01:05:28.412 --> 01:05:32.246
<v Joanne Lockwood>intrigued to get into the nitty gritty in the weeds of this to

01:05:32.268 --> 01:05:36.102
<v Joanne Lockwood>find out more about it. So, no, absolutely fantastic. Lovely. And I read it

01:05:36.156 --> 01:05:39.586
<v Suzanne Wertheim>slow because there's a good number of linguistic

01:05:39.618 --> 01:05:43.386
<v Suzanne Wertheim>concepts and sometimes people take time. So if you need to speed it

01:05:43.408 --> 01:05:46.474
<v Suzanne Wertheim>up, it's read slow enough that it works okay. For

01:05:46.512 --> 01:05:50.282
<v Suzanne Wertheim>1.25 speed, I believe. Okay. I was very

01:05:50.336 --> 01:05:53.914
<v Suzanne Wertheim>deliberate in the speed because I know that when people have new concepts,

01:05:53.962 --> 01:05:57.726
<v Suzanne Wertheim>sometimes it just takes a while. You just need

01:05:57.748 --> 01:06:01.120
<v Suzanne Wertheim>a little more time to hear that new word. Yeah,

01:06:01.570 --> 01:06:05.374
<v Joanne Lockwood>we've picked up on my terminology about zoning out. Sometimes when I'm on

01:06:05.492 --> 01:06:08.974
<v Joanne Lockwood>audiobooks, I find myself zoning out or hyper

01:06:09.022 --> 01:06:12.386
<v Joanne Lockwood>focusing on the previous thing, and then I have to stop it, rewind and go

01:06:12.408 --> 01:06:16.178
<v Joanne Lockwood>back again because I realise I haven't listened to about five minutes worth. So, yeah,

01:06:16.344 --> 01:06:20.146
<v Joanne Lockwood>I do regularly rewind and play them at different speeds

01:06:20.258 --> 01:06:24.054
<v Joanne Lockwood>or pick my moments. So I'll enjoy that. So thank you very much. I love

01:06:24.092 --> 01:06:27.846
<v Suzanne Wertheim>it. Well, thank you again. This has just been such a pleasure and such

01:06:27.868 --> 01:06:31.594
<v Suzanne Wertheim>a nice conversation. I really, genuinely enjoyed it.

01:06:31.792 --> 01:06:35.398
<v Joanne Lockwood>Thank you. And obviously. Thank you to you, the listener.

01:06:35.494 --> 01:06:38.986
<v Joanne Lockwood>Thank you for tuning in. Thank you for listening. Thank you for getting to the

01:06:39.008 --> 01:06:42.794
<v Joanne Lockwood>end. I really appreciate that. Of course, if you're not already subscribed, please

01:06:42.832 --> 01:06:46.554
<v Joanne Lockwood>do subscribe to keep updates on future episodes of the Inclusion

01:06:46.602 --> 01:06:50.410
<v Joanne Lockwood>Bites podcast. That's B-I-T-E-S. Tell your friends, tell your colleagues,

01:06:50.490 --> 01:06:54.286
<v Joanne Lockwood>share the love, share the episode. I've got a number of

01:06:54.388 --> 01:06:57.886
<v Joanne Lockwood>other exciting guests lined up over the next few weeks and months. And, of course,

01:06:57.908 --> 01:07:01.486
<v Joanne Lockwood>if you'd like to be a guest, please let me know. I'd welcome any

01:07:01.508 --> 01:07:05.070
<v Joanne Lockwood>feedback or suggestions to jo.lockwood@seechangehappen.co.uk.

01:07:06.010 --> 01:07:09.750
<v Joanne Lockwood>let me know how we can improve the show, if that's possible. Finally.

01:07:09.820 --> 01:07:13.538
<v Joanne Lockwood>My name is Joanne Lockwood. It's been an absolute pleasure to host

01:07:13.554 --> 01:07:17.010
<v Joanne Lockwood>this podcast for you today. Catch you next time. Bye.

