WEBVTT

00:00:00.730 --> 00:00:04.522
<v Joanne Lockwood>Hello, everyone. My name is Joanne Lockwood and I am your host

00:00:04.666 --> 00:00:08.414
<v Joanne Lockwood>for the Inclusion Bites Podcast. In this

00:00:08.452 --> 00:00:12.206
<v Joanne Lockwood>series, I have interviewed a number of amazing people and simply had

00:00:12.228 --> 00:00:16.026
<v Joanne Lockwood>a conversation around the subject of inclusion, belonging

00:00:16.138 --> 00:00:19.706
<v Joanne Lockwood>and generally making the world a better place for everyone to thrive.

00:00:19.898 --> 00:00:23.086
<v Joanne Lockwood>If you'd like to join me in the future, then please do drop me a

00:00:23.108 --> 00:00:26.790
<v Joanne Lockwood>line to jo.lockwood@seechangehappen.co.uk,

00:00:26.860 --> 00:00:30.636
<v Joanne Lockwood>that's S-E-E Change Happen dot co dot uk.

00:00:30.636 --> 00:00:34.214
<v Joanne Lockwood>You can catch up with all of the previous shows on itunes,

00:00:34.252 --> 00:00:37.510
<v Joanne Lockwood>Spotify and the usual places. So

00:00:37.870 --> 00:00:41.478
<v Joanne Lockwood>plug in your headphones, grab a decaf and

00:00:41.654 --> 00:00:45.260
<v Joanne Lockwood>let's get going. Today is

00:00:45.630 --> 00:00:49.414
<v Joanne Lockwood>Episode 89 with the title Unearthing

00:00:49.542 --> 00:00:53.134
<v Joanne Lockwood>Potential beyond the Resume.

00:00:53.172 --> 00:00:57.006
<v Joanne Lockwood>And I have the absolute honour and privilege to welcome

00:00:57.028 --> 00:01:00.506
<v Joanne Lockwood>Sara Dalsfeld. Sara is the Chief Marketing

00:01:00.538 --> 00:01:04.014
<v Joanne Lockwood>Officer at Adway. Adway are a talent attraction

00:01:04.062 --> 00:01:07.714
<v Joanne Lockwood>suite, a consciously inclusive platform that

00:01:07.912 --> 00:01:11.170
<v Joanne Lockwood>is built to find hard to reach talent on social media.

00:01:11.240 --> 00:01:15.018
<v Joanne Lockwood>And when I asked Sara to describe her superpower, she

00:01:15.054 --> 00:01:18.870
<v Joanne Lockwood>said she unapologetically dares

00:01:19.370 --> 00:01:22.520
<v Joanne Lockwood>to be herself and walks the talk. Hello,

00:01:23.210 --> 00:01:26.934
<v Joanne Lockwood>Sara, welcome to the show. Hello, Jo. Thank you for

00:01:26.972 --> 00:01:30.360
<v Sara Dalsfelt>having me on the show. We met

00:01:31.370 --> 00:01:34.406
<v Joanne Lockwood>several years ago. I think I did an adway

00:01:34.598 --> 00:01:38.038
<v Joanne Lockwood>podcast or live stream with you and we just went in the green room, weren't

00:01:38.054 --> 00:01:41.770
<v Joanne Lockwood>we? That was four or five years ago, early COVID. Yeah,

00:01:41.840 --> 00:01:45.486
<v Sara Dalsfelt>I just looked back. You were on my LinkedIn live show, 2019, I

00:01:45.508 --> 00:01:49.326
<v Sara Dalsfelt>believe, and we did a fabulous episode. You can

00:01:49.348 --> 00:01:52.942
<v Sara Dalsfelt>still rewatch it, everyone, for listening. In English it was called is

00:01:52.996 --> 00:01:56.434
<v Sara Dalsfelt>hiring for diversity hiring for second best? And we

00:01:56.472 --> 00:02:00.126
<v Sara Dalsfelt>unpacked what conscious inclusion means in Practise for hiring teams.

00:02:00.158 --> 00:02:03.666
<v Sara Dalsfelt>It's still a really good topic, a really good show.

00:02:03.848 --> 00:02:07.122
<v Sara Dalsfelt>And that's how we met, I believe, through the TA

00:02:07.176 --> 00:02:10.934
<v Sara Dalsfelt>community. It was last

00:02:10.972 --> 00:02:14.450
<v Joanne Lockwood>year. Yeah, we did on the adway

00:02:14.530 --> 00:02:18.146
<v Joanne Lockwood>stand, yeah. Brilliant. Yeah. I've been a fan of yours ever since,

00:02:18.188 --> 00:02:21.814
<v Sara Dalsfelt>Joanne. Like what you do for the space, who you are, the knowledge

00:02:21.862 --> 00:02:25.162
<v Sara Dalsfelt>you bring, the perspectives. I recommend you to

00:02:25.216 --> 00:02:28.662
<v Sara Dalsfelt>everyone I stumble across for Conscious Inclusive

00:02:28.726 --> 00:02:32.458
<v Sara Dalsfelt>hiring tactics. For those of you can't see,

00:02:32.544 --> 00:02:36.366
<v Joanne Lockwood>because this is a podcast, I've gone bright red, I'm blushing, I'm all over the

00:02:36.388 --> 00:02:40.094
<v Joanne Lockwood>place. This fangirl stuff is hard to take.

00:02:40.132 --> 00:02:43.906
<v Joanne Lockwood>Fangirls. You have to take it in. You're an important voice. Thank

00:02:43.928 --> 00:02:47.422
<v Joanne Lockwood>you. So, Unearthing

00:02:47.486 --> 00:02:51.278
<v Joanne Lockwood>Potential and so what is beyond the resume? Can we bin

00:02:51.294 --> 00:02:55.006
<v Joanne Lockwood>the resume? Yeah. For me, I

00:02:55.048 --> 00:02:58.850
<v Sara Dalsfelt>believe we're heading into a time where candidates

00:02:58.930 --> 00:03:02.390
<v Sara Dalsfelt>almost will start questioning employers in why

00:03:02.540 --> 00:03:06.294
<v Sara Dalsfelt>they're assessing their potential based on a piece of paper. I

00:03:06.332 --> 00:03:09.974
<v Sara Dalsfelt>believe we're almost there. Where? Well, the CV is, for most employers

00:03:10.022 --> 00:03:13.382
<v Sara Dalsfelt>now, even ancient, but it's still used, right. It's a traditional

00:03:13.446 --> 00:03:16.842
<v Sara Dalsfelt>hiring tactic, but in a very near

00:03:16.896 --> 00:03:20.526
<v Sara Dalsfelt>future, candidates will start questioning, how is this even

00:03:20.628 --> 00:03:24.014
<v Sara Dalsfelt>relevant to assessing my readiness, my potential and

00:03:24.052 --> 00:03:27.822
<v Sara Dalsfelt>my transferable skills? So everything

00:03:27.876 --> 00:03:31.486
<v Sara Dalsfelt>is beyond the resume? Everything is beyond the CV. The

00:03:31.508 --> 00:03:35.346
<v Sara Dalsfelt>person, the potential the people is beyond the CV. So

00:03:35.528 --> 00:03:39.266
<v Sara Dalsfelt>it's just an easy way for employers to weed out

00:03:39.368 --> 00:03:42.898
<v Sara Dalsfelt>what's not relevant to them and it holds a lot of

00:03:42.984 --> 00:03:46.742
<v Sara Dalsfelt>bias into the process. Don't you find

00:03:46.796 --> 00:03:49.874
<v Joanne Lockwood>that many traditional hiring

00:03:49.922 --> 00:03:53.286
<v Joanne Lockwood>managers, employers, they've got this kind

00:03:53.308 --> 00:03:57.126
<v Joanne Lockwood>of scared they're scared, aren't they? They start twitching if you say

00:03:57.148 --> 00:04:00.954
<v Joanne Lockwood>we can't have a CV. And they go how can I find out about people

00:04:00.992 --> 00:04:04.410
<v Joanne Lockwood>if I don't have their CV? Minds are blown. Minds are blown.

00:04:05.070 --> 00:04:08.554
<v Sara Dalsfelt>I'm here to tell you there's never been a time where there's more

00:04:08.592 --> 00:04:11.998
<v Sara Dalsfelt>tools, more tech, more solutions, more everything

00:04:12.164 --> 00:04:15.774
<v Sara Dalsfelt>to assess potential as early as possible in the

00:04:15.812 --> 00:04:19.534
<v Sara Dalsfelt>hiring funnel. And for me, Joanne, it all

00:04:19.572 --> 00:04:23.410
<v Sara Dalsfelt>comes down to if you're not consciously including,

00:04:23.830 --> 00:04:27.374
<v Sara Dalsfelt>you are most likely unconsciously excluding.

00:04:27.502 --> 00:04:31.282
<v Joanne Lockwood>That's definitely one of my sayings. I've used that. So yeah, it's so true.

00:04:31.416 --> 00:04:35.122
<v Sara Dalsfelt>There's so very few people building that in to their

00:04:35.176 --> 00:04:38.866
<v Sara Dalsfelt>talent attraction or talent acquisition strategy or hiring

00:04:38.898 --> 00:04:42.594
<v Sara Dalsfelt>strategy. It's still just a saying, it's a good quote on the fridge.

00:04:42.722 --> 00:04:46.534
<v Sara Dalsfelt>But we're here to say you have to consciously build it

00:04:46.572 --> 00:04:50.330
<v Sara Dalsfelt>in to your tech stack or your strategy or anything

00:04:50.480 --> 00:04:54.298
<v Sara Dalsfelt>in order when you go to find talents, it has to be built in,

00:04:54.384 --> 00:04:57.610
<v Sara Dalsfelt>otherwise you are most likely excluding

00:04:58.110 --> 00:05:01.742
<v Sara Dalsfelt>are organisations. This is a sporting analogy. Are they match fit

00:05:01.796 --> 00:05:05.626
<v Joanne Lockwood>for hiring? Because I see people talking about diverse

00:05:05.658 --> 00:05:09.358
<v Joanne Lockwood>hiring, inclusive hiring, whatever buzzword they want to

00:05:09.364 --> 00:05:12.738
<v Joanne Lockwood>use to make them sound kind of contemporary and on the

00:05:12.744 --> 00:05:15.300
<v Joanne Lockwood>mark. But I always wonder

00:05:16.310 --> 00:05:19.778
<v Joanne Lockwood>if the candidate experience and the employee experience

00:05:19.944 --> 00:05:23.346
<v Joanne Lockwood>they're selling is reality or a dream or

00:05:23.368 --> 00:05:26.974
<v Joanne Lockwood>vapour. Right? Absolutely. It's most likely

00:05:27.022 --> 00:05:30.806
<v Sara Dalsfelt>buzzwords. Right. We have to start somewhere. I believe everything starts with

00:05:30.828 --> 00:05:34.406
<v Sara Dalsfelt>buzwords but I mean, we have the

00:05:34.428 --> 00:05:37.430
<v Sara Dalsfelt>knowledge anything at our

00:05:37.580 --> 00:05:40.906
<v Sara Dalsfelt>fingertips, we can't just rely on

00:05:40.928 --> 00:05:44.522
<v Sara Dalsfelt>buzwords or quotes anymore. We have to start acting. And

00:05:44.576 --> 00:05:47.980
<v Sara Dalsfelt>as beautiful as our ta community is, we're good at talking.

00:05:48.430 --> 00:05:51.966
<v Sara Dalsfelt>That's where I sort know introduced myself with I walk the

00:05:51.988 --> 00:05:55.486
<v Sara Dalsfelt>talk. So why we built that way five years ago was

00:05:55.588 --> 00:05:59.034
<v Sara Dalsfelt>to make sure that there are tools

00:05:59.162 --> 00:06:02.766
<v Sara Dalsfelt>harnessing all the potential in diversity on social media. Because

00:06:02.788 --> 00:06:06.514
<v Sara Dalsfelt>there's over 5 billion people, every person under the sun

00:06:06.552 --> 00:06:10.274
<v Sara Dalsfelt>is on social media potentially. And there's ways where

00:06:10.312 --> 00:06:14.018
<v Sara Dalsfelt>you have to work in order to keep up

00:06:14.104 --> 00:06:17.922
<v Sara Dalsfelt>with the policies on some, to actively include

00:06:17.986 --> 00:06:21.762
<v Sara Dalsfelt>and not target anyone on gender or age or ethnicity

00:06:21.826 --> 00:06:25.586
<v Sara Dalsfelt>or all these factors that might come from an idea, from an hiring

00:06:25.618 --> 00:06:29.066
<v Sara Dalsfelt>manager. Right? So we built that way to have an

00:06:29.088 --> 00:06:32.762
<v Sara Dalsfelt>automated suite powered by AI to really go out and find

00:06:32.816 --> 00:06:36.646
<v Sara Dalsfelt>potential on social media and make sure the candid experience is walking

00:06:36.678 --> 00:06:38.620
<v Sara Dalsfelt>the talk. In terms of

00:06:40.690 --> 00:06:43.520
<v Sara Dalsfelt>the best shopping experience you've ever had online,

00:06:44.290 --> 00:06:48.046
<v Sara Dalsfelt>designing your dream car or just ordering your

00:06:48.068 --> 00:06:51.742
<v Sara Dalsfelt>foods for the grocery store or whatever piece of clothing you might

00:06:51.796 --> 00:06:55.474
<v Sara Dalsfelt>order that, but better, more sophisticated and more personalised should

00:06:55.512 --> 00:06:59.358
<v Sara Dalsfelt>be your hiring experience as well. So that's

00:06:59.374 --> 00:07:03.138
<v Sara Dalsfelt>the reason why we did it. And so far the most innovative and most

00:07:03.224 --> 00:07:07.046
<v Sara Dalsfelt>thought provoking and forward TA teams are using these kind

00:07:07.068 --> 00:07:10.790
<v Sara Dalsfelt>of tools because they know if they're not consciously

00:07:11.130 --> 00:07:14.326
<v Sara Dalsfelt>include, they are excluding in somewhere in the

00:07:14.348 --> 00:07:17.942
<v Sara Dalsfelt>journey. And I believe well, some

00:07:17.996 --> 00:07:21.514
<v Sara Dalsfelt>say, I say 90% of your hiring success is

00:07:21.552 --> 00:07:24.746
<v Sara Dalsfelt>determined at the first 10% of the

00:07:24.768 --> 00:07:27.914
<v Sara Dalsfelt>journey. So what you do in the first process, when you go

00:07:27.952 --> 00:07:31.754
<v Sara Dalsfelt>broad, when you go to find your audience and you start nudging

00:07:31.802 --> 00:07:35.214
<v Sara Dalsfelt>and attracting and building this storytelling experience for them,

00:07:35.412 --> 00:07:38.766
<v Sara Dalsfelt>that's where you can improve for potential and

00:07:38.788 --> 00:07:42.526
<v Sara Dalsfelt>diversity in the very first steps. And then, yes, there should be

00:07:42.548 --> 00:07:45.986
<v Sara Dalsfelt>automated assessments, right? There should be automated testing, there should be all these

00:07:46.088 --> 00:07:49.634
<v Sara Dalsfelt>features that helps both the hiring teams and the

00:07:49.672 --> 00:07:53.474
<v Sara Dalsfelt>candidate experience, right? So

00:07:53.672 --> 00:07:55.910
<v Sara Dalsfelt>why I'm on the podcast, Joe,

00:07:58.410 --> 00:08:02.150
<v Sara Dalsfelt>it's everything that we do, it's everything that I believe in and for myself.

00:08:02.300 --> 00:08:05.574
<v Sara Dalsfelt>I know we touched upon where I shared. I

00:08:05.612 --> 00:08:09.306
<v Sara Dalsfelt>have a one year long gap in my CV or

00:08:09.328 --> 00:08:12.902
<v Sara Dalsfelt>resume from a trauma, a really troubling trauma

00:08:12.966 --> 00:08:16.700
<v Sara Dalsfelt>where I had to be off work, right? And

00:08:17.230 --> 00:08:21.018
<v Sara Dalsfelt>these traditional hiring methods would never hire me. And here I

00:08:21.024 --> 00:08:24.638
<v Sara Dalsfelt>am, the CMO of my dream company that we started five years ago.

00:08:24.804 --> 00:08:28.298
<v Sara Dalsfelt>I would never been hired if I were to be judged

00:08:28.474 --> 00:08:31.360
<v Sara Dalsfelt>by a recruiter from my cover letter because

00:08:32.450 --> 00:08:36.146
<v Sara Dalsfelt>it's not saying anything about my readiness or my potential or what

00:08:36.168 --> 00:08:39.646
<v Sara Dalsfelt>I bring to the table in terms of transferable skills, et

00:08:39.678 --> 00:08:43.042
<v Sara Dalsfelt>cetera. So to answer your question, what's behind the

00:08:43.096 --> 00:08:45.570
<v Sara Dalsfelt>resume? Everything potential.

00:08:47.110 --> 00:08:50.566
<v Joanne Lockwood>So we know that the talent attraction part of the

00:08:50.588 --> 00:08:54.054
<v Joanne Lockwood>story starts way before we go to

00:08:54.092 --> 00:08:57.714
<v Joanne Lockwood>market with a campaign. If you're

00:08:57.762 --> 00:09:00.806
<v Joanne Lockwood>not in Ta, you're not in recruitment, talent acquisition,

00:09:00.998 --> 00:09:04.822
<v Joanne Lockwood>EVP, employer branding, all this value proposition

00:09:04.886 --> 00:09:08.602
<v Joanne Lockwood>stuff all around the recruitment marketing element. It's got to start way

00:09:08.656 --> 00:09:12.410
<v Joanne Lockwood>before and be that authentic thread through the organisation.

00:09:12.490 --> 00:09:16.186
<v Joanne Lockwood>So I often find that organisations are trying to jump to the hiring

00:09:16.218 --> 00:09:19.834
<v Joanne Lockwood>phase without doing the heavy

00:09:19.882 --> 00:09:23.166
<v Joanne Lockwood>lift on the. But on the contrary, a lot of

00:09:23.188 --> 00:09:26.914
<v Sara Dalsfelt>teams, they stay stuck and paralysed in the

00:09:26.952 --> 00:09:30.510
<v Sara Dalsfelt>work of the EVP or the career page or the value proposition

00:09:30.590 --> 00:09:34.322
<v Sara Dalsfelt>or the communication versus not a lot of people have the

00:09:34.376 --> 00:09:38.166
<v Sara Dalsfelt>distribution, the actual strategy. How do

00:09:38.188 --> 00:09:41.462
<v Sara Dalsfelt>you take your fabulous EVP to the

00:09:41.516 --> 00:09:44.802
<v Sara Dalsfelt>phones, the hands of the most desired

00:09:44.866 --> 00:09:48.658
<v Sara Dalsfelt>candidates that you want to approach? Not a lot of teams

00:09:48.834 --> 00:09:52.346
<v Sara Dalsfelt>put the investment or the energy into the

00:09:52.368 --> 00:09:55.894
<v Sara Dalsfelt>distribution of that. They just hope that people will find their EVP

00:09:56.022 --> 00:09:59.290
<v Sara Dalsfelt>or find their employer branding. So even if you have the most

00:09:59.360 --> 00:10:03.118
<v Sara Dalsfelt>inclusive promise as an employer, how do you

00:10:03.124 --> 00:10:06.682
<v Sara Dalsfelt>have the most inclusive and thought through strategy

00:10:06.826 --> 00:10:10.410
<v Sara Dalsfelt>to go and approach them? And approaching

00:10:10.490 --> 00:10:14.194
<v Sara Dalsfelt>means approaching mostly like passive candidates, hard

00:10:14.232 --> 00:10:17.378
<v Sara Dalsfelt>to reach talents. Talents that most likely are already

00:10:17.544 --> 00:10:21.234
<v Sara Dalsfelt>fully employed, working doing what they

00:10:21.272 --> 00:10:25.006
<v Sara Dalsfelt>love. So you now have to have a strategy that's

00:10:25.038 --> 00:10:28.370
<v Sara Dalsfelt>really built into providing your lovely EVP

00:10:28.810 --> 00:10:32.614
<v Sara Dalsfelt>into the hands of their phones, where they spend over three 4

00:10:32.652 --> 00:10:36.374
<v Sara Dalsfelt>hours a day scrolling through social media. And it has to be an experience

00:10:36.492 --> 00:10:40.120
<v Sara Dalsfelt>that's built for that specific social media channels that they're in,

00:10:40.650 --> 00:10:44.074
<v Sara Dalsfelt>all while being as inclusive as they want it with their

00:10:44.112 --> 00:10:47.706
<v Sara Dalsfelt>EVP. So you see, there's a lot of like

00:10:47.808 --> 00:10:51.546
<v Sara Dalsfelt>as to your point, a lot of teams spend their time figuring out

00:10:51.568 --> 00:10:55.354
<v Sara Dalsfelt>the EVP, but the other part they just jump

00:10:55.402 --> 00:10:58.366
<v Sara Dalsfelt>straight into the hiring and not a lot of companies spend the time on the

00:10:58.388 --> 00:11:02.126
<v Sara Dalsfelt>distribution. How do we go to market? How do we make

00:11:02.148 --> 00:11:05.938
<v Sara Dalsfelt>sure that we've opened the funnel for as many

00:11:06.024 --> 00:11:09.794
<v Sara Dalsfelt>talents as possible? Because here's the facts. You

00:11:09.832 --> 00:11:13.342
<v Sara Dalsfelt>need to go broad in order to attract diverse talent

00:11:13.486 --> 00:11:16.758
<v Sara Dalsfelt>and the best talent from there,

00:11:16.924 --> 00:11:20.642
<v Sara Dalsfelt>volumes of candidates will still be relevant talents

00:11:20.706 --> 00:11:24.150
<v Sara Dalsfelt>if you automate the assessment and the testing and

00:11:24.220 --> 00:11:27.766
<v Sara Dalsfelt>everything screening based that you might have. But you

00:11:27.788 --> 00:11:31.334
<v Sara Dalsfelt>can't say that you have an inclusive hiring if you just go to a selected

00:11:31.382 --> 00:11:35.114
<v Sara Dalsfelt>network or a close group or your best

00:11:35.152 --> 00:11:39.002
<v Sara Dalsfelt>friend, or your male friend.

00:11:39.136 --> 00:11:42.974
<v Sara Dalsfelt>That usually happens. So that's why I

00:11:43.012 --> 00:11:46.526
<v Sara Dalsfelt>really challenge ta teams to look into how do you go to

00:11:46.548 --> 00:11:49.790
<v Sara Dalsfelt>market and stay consciously inclusive.

00:11:52.370 --> 00:11:56.194
<v Joanne Lockwood>I'm just trying to piece together what you're saying here. So help me out.

00:11:56.232 --> 00:11:59.230
<v Joanne Lockwood>So are we talking about a broad

00:11:59.310 --> 00:12:02.766
<v Joanne Lockwood>spectrum of trying to build our candidate

00:12:02.798 --> 00:12:06.600
<v Joanne Lockwood>pool our talent pipeline from a broader spectrum as possible

00:12:06.970 --> 00:12:10.742
<v Joanne Lockwood>around a broad demographic and skill set and everything else,

00:12:10.876 --> 00:12:14.626
<v Joanne Lockwood>and then being able to bring those into your funnel, your pipeline

00:12:14.818 --> 00:12:18.262
<v Joanne Lockwood>and use automation to sift

00:12:18.326 --> 00:12:22.074
<v Joanne Lockwood>preselect on competency and capability and

00:12:22.112 --> 00:12:25.754
<v Joanne Lockwood>adaptability and change all these sort of things. Yes, the hiring team

00:12:25.792 --> 00:12:29.094
<v Joanne Lockwood>themselves are just getting a presifted diverse

00:12:29.142 --> 00:12:32.798
<v Joanne Lockwood>pool. Exactly that. Exactly that. You won't get to a

00:12:32.804 --> 00:12:36.366
<v Sara Dalsfelt>presifted diverse, relevant pool if you don't open the

00:12:36.388 --> 00:12:40.154
<v Sara Dalsfelt>funnel from the beginning. And opening the funnel is utilising

00:12:40.202 --> 00:12:43.940
<v Sara Dalsfelt>tech because there's the heavy lifting right there's where

00:12:44.390 --> 00:12:48.034
<v Sara Dalsfelt>automation really comes in. So what I'm saying is

00:12:48.152 --> 00:12:52.002
<v Sara Dalsfelt>there's no other platform in the world where over

00:12:52.056 --> 00:12:55.394
<v Sara Dalsfelt>5 billion people spend more time than they do on

00:12:55.432 --> 00:12:59.174
<v Sara Dalsfelt>eating every day. The general user on

00:12:59.212 --> 00:13:02.582
<v Sara Dalsfelt>social media spends social media almost like they spend almost

00:13:02.636 --> 00:13:06.454
<v Sara Dalsfelt>2.5 hours a day. And that is increasing. Like, you know,

00:13:06.492 --> 00:13:10.234
<v Sara Dalsfelt>just cheque your settings, right? That is increasing. So what I say is

00:13:10.272 --> 00:13:14.042
<v Sara Dalsfelt>you have to go where the candidates spend their time, where they live

00:13:14.096 --> 00:13:17.642
<v Sara Dalsfelt>their lives, right? You have to then make sure you

00:13:17.696 --> 00:13:21.482
<v Sara Dalsfelt>are distributing a strategy that builds a storytelling experience

00:13:21.616 --> 00:13:25.422
<v Sara Dalsfelt>based on your EVP, on your employer brand, on all these value

00:13:25.476 --> 00:13:29.322
<v Sara Dalsfelt>propositions that are as inclusive as you say. Meaning

00:13:29.466 --> 00:13:33.154
<v Sara Dalsfelt>you will then only attract and assess the most relevant talents because

00:13:33.192 --> 00:13:36.878
<v Sara Dalsfelt>they've been appealed and targeted based on potential and readiness.

00:13:36.974 --> 00:13:40.706
<v Sara Dalsfelt>And your arguments that are

00:13:40.728 --> 00:13:44.530
<v Sara Dalsfelt>selling to them. Because there's always

00:13:44.600 --> 00:13:47.686
<v Sara Dalsfelt>like, I love this discussion, but people always come back to it, say, I just

00:13:47.708 --> 00:13:50.760
<v Sara Dalsfelt>want one great candidate. Right.

00:13:51.690 --> 00:13:54.774
<v Sara Dalsfelt>How with one great candidate would you know, you've opened the pool for

00:13:54.812 --> 00:13:57.914
<v Sara Dalsfelt>potential, for inclusion, for diversity. For

00:13:57.952 --> 00:14:01.786
<v Sara Dalsfelt>diversity. You wouldn't. What you're saying to

00:14:01.808 --> 00:14:05.594
<v Sara Dalsfelt>me is I want an easy life. Sure. Easy life means doing

00:14:05.632 --> 00:14:08.540
<v Sara Dalsfelt>the right thing, consciously working into

00:14:08.910 --> 00:14:12.458
<v Sara Dalsfelt>working inclusive strategies into your method,

00:14:12.554 --> 00:14:15.902
<v Sara Dalsfelt>but utilising the tech then to do the heavy lifting. So you sit

00:14:15.956 --> 00:14:19.130
<v Sara Dalsfelt>then with that relevant social talent pools

00:14:19.210 --> 00:14:22.518
<v Sara Dalsfelt>based on relevance, potential, readiness,

00:14:22.714 --> 00:14:26.498
<v Sara Dalsfelt>and with the most diverse teams you could ever imagine. And from there

00:14:26.584 --> 00:14:28.500
<v Sara Dalsfelt>you could start assessing. Right.

00:14:32.390 --> 00:14:36.120
<v Joanne Lockwood>This is kind of like headhunting on

00:14:37.450 --> 00:14:41.106
<v Joanne Lockwood>a mega enormous scale. So you've

00:14:41.138 --> 00:14:44.918
<v Joanne Lockwood>got a pool of potentially thousands of people or more

00:14:45.084 --> 00:14:48.678
<v Joanne Lockwood>being spear fishing them. So you're targeting them directly

00:14:48.774 --> 00:14:50.460
<v Joanne Lockwood>on mass. Yes.

00:14:53.150 --> 00:14:56.998
<v Joanne Lockwood>You're not suggesting cast a broad net everywhere. What you're

00:14:57.014 --> 00:14:59.900
<v Joanne Lockwood>saying is you're casting your net specifically for

00:15:00.210 --> 00:15:03.918
<v Joanne Lockwood>competency and skills. So it is spear phishing, but on a

00:15:03.924 --> 00:15:07.486
<v Joanne Lockwood>mega scale. Yeah. And we work with behavioural targeting, so

00:15:07.508 --> 00:15:09.920
<v Sara Dalsfelt>it's still targeted. But then

00:15:10.850 --> 00:15:14.530
<v Sara Dalsfelt>how algorithms work is that they have to learn

00:15:14.600 --> 00:15:18.020
<v Sara Dalsfelt>from a lot of data initially. Right. And

00:15:18.630 --> 00:15:22.338
<v Sara Dalsfelt>with that you can then teach algorithm to work towards

00:15:22.424 --> 00:15:25.926
<v Sara Dalsfelt>then specific data points that are building for an

00:15:25.948 --> 00:15:29.670
<v Sara Dalsfelt>inclusive hiring strategy or not segmenting anyone

00:15:29.740 --> 00:15:33.410
<v Sara Dalsfelt>on gender or ethnicity or all these bias factors.

00:15:33.490 --> 00:15:36.870
<v Sara Dalsfelt>So it's simply making

00:15:36.940 --> 00:15:40.746
<v Sara Dalsfelt>sure you walk the talk in your ta setup as

00:15:40.768 --> 00:15:44.586
<v Sara Dalsfelt>well. Like, everything into your tech stack should walk the

00:15:44.608 --> 00:15:48.234
<v Sara Dalsfelt>talk and you have to make sure it does. Can't just be the

00:15:48.272 --> 00:15:51.662
<v Sara Dalsfelt>quote you're throwing at your next RL 100 talk.

00:15:51.716 --> 00:15:55.360
<v Sara Dalsfelt>Right. You have to walk the talk and

00:15:55.970 --> 00:15:57.520
<v Sara Dalsfelt>look into your own process.

00:16:01.410 --> 00:16:04.866
<v Joanne Lockwood>How long does the candidate stay passive in the

00:16:04.888 --> 00:16:08.706
<v Joanne Lockwood>process? Until they're kind of triggered into a

00:16:08.728 --> 00:16:12.514
<v Joanne Lockwood>kind of yes, this person meets our primary criteria, then we'll do some

00:16:12.552 --> 00:16:15.974
<v Joanne Lockwood>outreach so they can be passive in this process for

00:16:16.012 --> 00:16:19.558
<v Joanne Lockwood>years. Drop into it. This is such an interesting

00:16:19.644 --> 00:16:23.318
<v Sara Dalsfelt>question. Right. So there's a consensus in the market, like in the

00:16:23.324 --> 00:16:26.834
<v Sara Dalsfelt>hiring industry, that we've

00:16:26.882 --> 00:16:30.670
<v Sara Dalsfelt>always talked about a passive and an active market. Right. People active

00:16:30.690 --> 00:16:34.026
<v Sara Dalsfelt>looking for a job when they're in between jobs. Right. And people who happen to

00:16:34.048 --> 00:16:37.626
<v Sara Dalsfelt>be employed. But I like to look at

00:16:37.648 --> 00:16:40.814
<v Sara Dalsfelt>it as to your point, as how I incorporate your

00:16:40.852 --> 00:16:44.350
<v Sara Dalsfelt>question. There's a window of opportunity where

00:16:44.420 --> 00:16:48.074
<v Sara Dalsfelt>someone is about to act if we go back to e commerce

00:16:48.122 --> 00:16:51.850
<v Sara Dalsfelt>and shopping tactics online. Right. I'm a passive

00:16:51.930 --> 00:16:55.738
<v Sara Dalsfelt>customer always. I have money, I'm on social media, I

00:16:55.764 --> 00:16:59.506
<v Sara Dalsfelt>like clothes. Let's make it easy. Right? I'm not in the look for

00:16:59.528 --> 00:17:03.186
<v Sara Dalsfelt>anything. Yeah, you too. Exactly. Who isn't? Jack Joe? Who

00:17:03.208 --> 00:17:06.854
<v Sara Dalsfelt>isn't? I'm not in the look for anything. Let's just make it super

00:17:06.892 --> 00:17:10.514
<v Sara Dalsfelt>easy. It's been black month. Black Friday. I've

00:17:10.562 --> 00:17:14.406
<v Sara Dalsfelt>done all my shopping. I'm satisfied. But I'm still a

00:17:14.428 --> 00:17:18.138
<v Sara Dalsfelt>passive customer online, living my life on

00:17:18.144 --> 00:17:21.180
<v Sara Dalsfelt>social media, right? If I stumble across

00:17:21.790 --> 00:17:25.398
<v Sara Dalsfelt>really targeted ads with very personalised messages,

00:17:25.494 --> 00:17:28.774
<v Sara Dalsfelt>discount codes, anything, and these ads,

00:17:28.822 --> 00:17:32.518
<v Sara Dalsfelt>iterate they go after me on Instagram, then when I'm

00:17:32.534 --> 00:17:36.046
<v Sara Dalsfelt>on TikTok, I get a new one. When I'm on LinkedIn, I get three other

00:17:36.068 --> 00:17:39.834
<v Sara Dalsfelt>ones. When know, jumping into could be Twitch

00:17:39.882 --> 00:17:43.050
<v Sara Dalsfelt>or whatever platform that might be. I have a designed

00:17:43.130 --> 00:17:46.914
<v Sara Dalsfelt>experience to sort of approach me with a product, right?

00:17:46.952 --> 00:17:50.622
<v Sara Dalsfelt>In this case, might be a bag. I like bags, for instance.

00:17:50.686 --> 00:17:54.258
<v Sara Dalsfelt>Let's make it super easy. So there's a window of opportunity

00:17:54.424 --> 00:17:57.960
<v Sara Dalsfelt>where I've been nudged enough times.

00:17:58.570 --> 00:18:02.262
<v Sara Dalsfelt>There's not a golden number, but a lot of people say there should be seven

00:18:02.396 --> 00:18:06.198
<v Sara Dalsfelt>touch points in order to make an action, right? So

00:18:06.364 --> 00:18:10.070
<v Sara Dalsfelt>in the window of time where I turn active,

00:18:10.230 --> 00:18:14.022
<v Sara Dalsfelt>that's where I believe you have to make sure you have a process that's

00:18:14.086 --> 00:18:17.898
<v Sara Dalsfelt>so sophisticated, that actually capitalises on

00:18:17.904 --> 00:18:21.226
<v Sara Dalsfelt>my window of opportunity when I'm active. So it means

00:18:21.408 --> 00:18:25.166
<v Sara Dalsfelt>I need to be buying this bag with one click. I have

00:18:25.188 --> 00:18:29.006
<v Sara Dalsfelt>to feel super secure. I have to trust the tech. I have

00:18:29.028 --> 00:18:32.190
<v Sara Dalsfelt>to make sure it's not a scam site, it's not a scam

00:18:32.770 --> 00:18:36.034
<v Sara Dalsfelt>company taking my card details. I have to feel super

00:18:36.072 --> 00:18:39.390
<v Sara Dalsfelt>trusted. And it should be the smoothest, easiest

00:18:39.470 --> 00:18:43.074
<v Sara Dalsfelt>confirming experience ever. Like, yes, sir, you're doing the right thing.

00:18:43.192 --> 00:18:46.806
<v Sara Dalsfelt>The bag is coming in a day. One click, we have all the

00:18:46.828 --> 00:18:50.470
<v Sara Dalsfelt>information that we need. And the same goes for

00:18:50.540 --> 00:18:54.214
<v Sara Dalsfelt>applying for a job. There's a window of opportunity.

00:18:54.332 --> 00:18:58.090
<v Sara Dalsfelt>And this window of opportunity can increase by building

00:18:58.160 --> 00:19:01.482
<v Sara Dalsfelt>these personalised storytelling experiences over social media

00:19:01.536 --> 00:19:04.486
<v Sara Dalsfelt>platforms, making me turning me into an active

00:19:04.518 --> 00:19:08.294
<v Sara Dalsfelt>candidate once I've been presented

00:19:08.342 --> 00:19:12.174
<v Sara Dalsfelt>with these offers over time. So to your point, yes, it can

00:19:12.212 --> 00:19:15.534
<v Sara Dalsfelt>take over six months. We have a process that makes

00:19:15.572 --> 00:19:19.214
<v Sara Dalsfelt>sure our customers, they hire everything from

00:19:19.252 --> 00:19:22.794
<v Sara Dalsfelt>CEOs down to customer service personnel or whatever, like

00:19:22.852 --> 00:19:26.114
<v Sara Dalsfelt>all different types of roles. And it takes

00:19:26.232 --> 00:19:29.406
<v Sara Dalsfelt>forever for some because they're so passive. Could be eye

00:19:29.438 --> 00:19:33.118
<v Sara Dalsfelt>doctors or pharmacists, right? They're

00:19:33.134 --> 00:19:36.514
<v Sara Dalsfelt>so passive in terms of looking for job, but they're very active in terms of

00:19:36.552 --> 00:19:40.006
<v Sara Dalsfelt>working, so they're not a lot of time approaching them, right? They might be on

00:19:40.028 --> 00:19:43.606
<v Sara Dalsfelt>social media just when they're taking a coffee. Then the

00:19:43.628 --> 00:19:47.446
<v Sara Dalsfelt>timing needs to be there. The sophisticated strategy needs to be there. So

00:19:47.468 --> 00:19:50.906
<v Sara Dalsfelt>I like to look at it as a window of time

00:19:51.088 --> 00:19:54.458
<v Sara Dalsfelt>when someone turn active. You have to make sure your

00:19:54.544 --> 00:19:57.770
<v Sara Dalsfelt>software works for you to capitalise on this

00:19:57.840 --> 00:20:01.566
<v Sara Dalsfelt>very rare moment. I

00:20:01.588 --> 00:20:05.386
<v Joanne Lockwood>love that idea. I'm with you on bags, but I'm

00:20:05.418 --> 00:20:08.574
<v Joanne Lockwood>probably almost active on buying an air

00:20:08.612 --> 00:20:12.286
<v Joanne Lockwood>fryer everywhere I go. I

00:20:12.308 --> 00:20:15.060
<v Sara Dalsfelt>bet you every social media channel knows this.

00:20:16.310 --> 00:20:19.566
<v Sara Dalsfelt>You're 80% there. And I'm being honed

00:20:19.598 --> 00:20:23.422
<v Joanne Lockwood>into a certain brand, a certain price range,

00:20:23.566 --> 00:20:27.414
<v Joanne Lockwood>certain feature set, because I can feel that I've inquired and I've done some

00:20:27.452 --> 00:20:31.206
<v Joanne Lockwood>research and I'm looking at certain things. So this

00:20:31.228 --> 00:20:34.978
<v Joanne Lockwood>is what you're saying, really is it's building up a behavioural pattern

00:20:35.154 --> 00:20:38.360
<v Joanne Lockwood>of what has interested me, what hasn't interested me,

00:20:38.970 --> 00:20:42.714
<v Joanne Lockwood>where I go, it indicates my abilities and my

00:20:42.752 --> 00:20:46.234
<v Joanne Lockwood>people I hang out with. So you're building up a picture of me to know

00:20:46.272 --> 00:20:50.074
<v Joanne Lockwood>that this particular air fryer on Black Friday, and you

00:20:50.112 --> 00:20:53.854
<v Joanne Lockwood>probably know that 50 pounds off is my kind of deal

00:20:53.972 --> 00:20:57.726
<v Joanne Lockwood>threshold. Yes. And then I'm going to click on it and then, as you

00:20:57.748 --> 00:21:01.210
<v Joanne Lockwood>say, it has to happen immediately. Immediately,

00:21:01.290 --> 00:21:05.042
<v Sara Dalsfelt>yes. It has to be a trusted process. Super easy, one

00:21:05.096 --> 00:21:08.894
<v Sara Dalsfelt>click and it should be. Imagine

00:21:08.942 --> 00:21:12.402
<v Sara Dalsfelt>the business of an e commerce, not converting those

00:21:12.456 --> 00:21:15.974
<v Sara Dalsfelt>Joes like yourself actually going to market for that air

00:21:16.012 --> 00:21:19.734
<v Sara Dalsfelt>fryer. Imagine that business loss. And the same goes

00:21:19.772 --> 00:21:23.622
<v Sara Dalsfelt>for ta teams. For instance, look at the spill happening

00:21:23.676 --> 00:21:27.430
<v Sara Dalsfelt>on every career page today. Every ta team out there

00:21:27.500 --> 00:21:30.954
<v Sara Dalsfelt>invests a lot of money in driving traffic to their career page.

00:21:31.152 --> 00:21:34.966
<v Sara Dalsfelt>Nothing new. Right. What do you think is the average conversion rate on a career

00:21:34.998 --> 00:21:38.746
<v Sara Dalsfelt>page today? I guess it was pretty low because people are

00:21:38.768 --> 00:21:42.122
<v Joanne Lockwood>just window shopping, passively checking the market out.

00:21:42.256 --> 00:21:45.782
<v Sara Dalsfelt>Yes. But some teams are like, I wouldn't,

00:21:45.926 --> 00:21:49.386
<v Sara Dalsfelt>so I argue there's not a lot of passive

00:21:49.418 --> 00:21:53.178
<v Sara Dalsfelt>candidates just surfing around, a lot of clicks, a

00:21:53.204 --> 00:21:56.706
<v Sara Dalsfelt>lot of steps down to your specific career page.

00:21:56.888 --> 00:22:00.158
<v Sara Dalsfelt>It's a big ask. It's a big ask for a pharmaceutical

00:22:00.254 --> 00:22:03.826
<v Sara Dalsfelt>working full time, super stressed, having

00:22:03.928 --> 00:22:07.346
<v Sara Dalsfelt>everything to do by themselves. Right. So not a lot

00:22:07.368 --> 00:22:11.094
<v Sara Dalsfelt>of passive candidates stumble across a career page because

00:22:11.132 --> 00:22:14.198
<v Sara Dalsfelt>that's not like your SEO isn't that good? I would just shout. You got to

00:22:14.204 --> 00:22:17.366
<v Joanne Lockwood>kind of have a motivation. You're disgruntled, you're at

00:22:17.388 --> 00:22:20.700
<v Joanne Lockwood>risk, something's happened. Exactly.

00:22:21.230 --> 00:22:24.874
<v Sara Dalsfelt>There's people naturally looking for there's some

00:22:24.912 --> 00:22:28.742
<v Sara Dalsfelt>percentage going into career pages, but that's not the majority. The majority

00:22:28.806 --> 00:22:32.382
<v Sara Dalsfelt>would mainly spend their time on social media or anything

00:22:32.436 --> 00:22:36.094
<v Sara Dalsfelt>else on their phones. Right. But so the ones that

00:22:36.132 --> 00:22:39.358
<v Sara Dalsfelt>actually do come to the career page have

00:22:39.524 --> 00:22:43.306
<v Sara Dalsfelt>often committed to something. There's often some interest there.

00:22:43.348 --> 00:22:46.866
<v Sara Dalsfelt>Once you actually come into a career page, that means

00:22:47.048 --> 00:22:50.722
<v Sara Dalsfelt>losing out. On an average, 98%

00:22:50.776 --> 00:22:54.514
<v Sara Dalsfelt>of the traffic is like throwing fishnets in the

00:22:54.552 --> 00:22:58.262
<v Sara Dalsfelt>water and not picking up the fish. And this happens for almost all

00:22:58.316 --> 00:23:02.006
<v Sara Dalsfelt>ta teams and hiring teams out there. And again, how is this

00:23:02.028 --> 00:23:05.666
<v Sara Dalsfelt>building upon to your inclusive, diverse talent

00:23:05.698 --> 00:23:09.206
<v Sara Dalsfelt>pools? How is this building for the canned experience? It's not. It's

00:23:09.238 --> 00:23:12.986
<v Sara Dalsfelt>just repelling thousands and

00:23:13.008 --> 00:23:16.714
<v Sara Dalsfelt>thousands and thousands of people every day. Hundreds, if you're an

00:23:16.752 --> 00:23:20.054
<v Sara Dalsfelt>average company. But this loop is just

00:23:20.112 --> 00:23:23.360
<v Sara Dalsfelt>where I get

00:23:23.890 --> 00:23:27.626
<v Sara Dalsfelt>fascinated of how this can still be going on when there's

00:23:27.658 --> 00:23:31.486
<v Sara Dalsfelt>so much knowledge and there's so much you don't even

00:23:31.508 --> 00:23:35.314
<v Sara Dalsfelt>have to be using social media yourself to know that there's a

00:23:35.352 --> 00:23:38.894
<v Sara Dalsfelt>certain expectation from a persona, a user

00:23:38.942 --> 00:23:42.786
<v Sara Dalsfelt>today. And, Joe, you're the same persona buying the airfire as

00:23:42.808 --> 00:23:46.626
<v Sara Dalsfelt>you would be applying for a job that Adway would promote. Right.

00:23:46.808 --> 00:23:49.734
<v Sara Dalsfelt>You're still the same. Your behaviour is still the same. You have the same

00:23:49.772 --> 00:23:53.526
<v Sara Dalsfelt>expectations. You go into social media, you go online, you have an

00:23:53.548 --> 00:23:56.774
<v Sara Dalsfelt>expectation of your user experience that has to be

00:23:56.812 --> 00:24:00.118
<v Sara Dalsfelt>met. Otherwise you would never buy the air fryer.

00:24:00.294 --> 00:24:04.122
<v Sara Dalsfelt>You expect Amazon checkout or you expect easy

00:24:04.176 --> 00:24:07.420
<v Sara Dalsfelt>buy or you expect klarna easy checkout or whatever.

00:24:08.030 --> 00:24:11.406
<v Sara Dalsfelt>And the same persona is expecting a super easy

00:24:11.588 --> 00:24:15.406
<v Sara Dalsfelt>application journey. So as

00:24:15.428 --> 00:24:19.262
<v Joanne Lockwood>a passive candidate, I'm browsing minded my own business

00:24:19.316 --> 00:24:22.590
<v Joanne Lockwood>and I would start seeing targeted

00:24:23.750 --> 00:24:27.554
<v Joanne Lockwood>content around a brand, around a

00:24:27.592 --> 00:24:31.090
<v Joanne Lockwood>story the brand's telling to lure me in, to

00:24:31.240 --> 00:24:35.074
<v Joanne Lockwood>create a brand association. This brand is good. I love this

00:24:35.112 --> 00:24:38.886
<v Joanne Lockwood>brand in my head. And then they're going to kind

00:24:38.908 --> 00:24:42.726
<v Joanne Lockwood>of hit me with a why don't you find out more about us? Is that

00:24:42.748 --> 00:24:46.466
<v Joanne Lockwood>the kind of approach to try and drive me into their inquiry

00:24:46.498 --> 00:24:50.166
<v Joanne Lockwood>funnel? Yes. So what we do is we build social talent

00:24:50.198 --> 00:24:53.706
<v Sara Dalsfelt>pools built of relevance as well. So, yes, we would definitely

00:24:53.808 --> 00:24:57.466
<v Sara Dalsfelt>go to market with a lot of arguments built on our

00:24:57.488 --> 00:25:00.770
<v Sara Dalsfelt>customers. ICP, EVP, employee branding, all the arguments that's

00:25:00.790 --> 00:25:03.710
<v Sara Dalsfelt>relevant for all the categories that they are

00:25:03.860 --> 00:25:07.454
<v Sara Dalsfelt>promoting. But then as to your point, there needs to be a sort

00:25:07.492 --> 00:25:10.670
<v Sara Dalsfelt>of Hansel and Greta storytelling experience

00:25:10.820 --> 00:25:14.378
<v Sara Dalsfelt>happening to even care. Because you're not in a war for

00:25:14.404 --> 00:25:17.250
<v Sara Dalsfelt>talent, you're in a war for attention.

00:25:18.230 --> 00:25:21.794
<v Sara Dalsfelt>And that comes back to the distribution and the strategy of

00:25:21.832 --> 00:25:25.586
<v Sara Dalsfelt>getting the right message at the right time on the right platform with the

00:25:25.608 --> 00:25:29.366
<v Sara Dalsfelt>right window of opportunity. So what we do is

00:25:29.388 --> 00:25:33.014
<v Sara Dalsfelt>that we build these talent pools that we can then retarget with all

00:25:33.052 --> 00:25:36.614
<v Sara Dalsfelt>these relevant messages. One good example that we always

00:25:36.652 --> 00:25:40.390
<v Sara Dalsfelt>do is, for instance, how the travel industry

00:25:40.470 --> 00:25:43.100
<v Sara Dalsfelt>have really nailed online

00:25:44.110 --> 00:25:47.734
<v Sara Dalsfelt>purchases of travels, right? The majority

00:25:47.782 --> 00:25:51.438
<v Sara Dalsfelt>of travels being sold or bought today is happening online.

00:25:51.524 --> 00:25:55.262
<v Sara Dalsfelt>And that's been an industry sort of pioneering how

00:25:55.316 --> 00:25:58.718
<v Sara Dalsfelt>you would go about an online order,

00:25:58.884 --> 00:26:02.494
<v Sara Dalsfelt>because like ten years back, we still shopped a lot of

00:26:02.532 --> 00:26:06.274
<v Sara Dalsfelt>well, we did a lot of travel bookings online. It was one of the first

00:26:06.312 --> 00:26:09.886
<v Sara Dalsfelt>industries starting it, and still today it's one of the most lucrative

00:26:09.918 --> 00:26:13.602
<v Sara Dalsfelt>industries in terms of online shopping. Right? So what they do is,

00:26:13.736 --> 00:26:17.090
<v Sara Dalsfelt>first of all, an online ecommerce company, like

00:26:17.160 --> 00:26:20.710
<v Sara Dalsfelt>booking.com, let's make it easy. They are very much

00:26:20.780 --> 00:26:24.162
<v Sara Dalsfelt>aware that it's not one ad that sells

00:26:24.226 --> 00:26:27.480
<v Sara Dalsfelt>their travel destination. It's an experience.

00:26:27.850 --> 00:26:31.686
<v Sara Dalsfelt>And it's an experience that has to have built in social proof

00:26:31.718 --> 00:26:35.514
<v Sara Dalsfelt>and trust in order for anyone to even care and

00:26:35.552 --> 00:26:38.858
<v Sara Dalsfelt>put that much money behind it. Because it's for instance, let's say we're going to

00:26:38.864 --> 00:26:42.234
<v Sara Dalsfelt>the Maldives, quite an investment. Often

00:26:42.432 --> 00:26:46.206
<v Sara Dalsfelt>like honeymoon investment, even like you wouldn't just randomly on

00:26:46.228 --> 00:26:49.934
<v Sara Dalsfelt>a spring holiday go to Maldives, right? This is big investment and

00:26:49.972 --> 00:26:53.566
<v Sara Dalsfelt>these companies know this. So they have to build a storytelling

00:26:53.598 --> 00:26:57.374
<v Sara Dalsfelt>experience where they blend

00:26:57.502 --> 00:27:01.202
<v Sara Dalsfelt>messages and social proof and trust into all these

00:27:01.256 --> 00:27:04.740
<v Sara Dalsfelt>different ads, approaching the customers

00:27:05.050 --> 00:27:07.510
<v Sara Dalsfelt>with a sophisticated, timely,

00:27:08.010 --> 00:27:11.638
<v Sara Dalsfelt>precisely timing of everything. So there's like a

00:27:11.644 --> 00:27:15.186
<v Sara Dalsfelt>fine line being spammed, as you might have been experienced,

00:27:15.218 --> 00:27:19.046
<v Sara Dalsfelt>Joe, like, spammed with the targeting ads. Like, I already bought those shoes.

00:27:19.078 --> 00:27:22.854
<v Sara Dalsfelt>Why are they still following me? That is not a sophisticated journey,

00:27:22.902 --> 00:27:26.746
<v Sara Dalsfelt>that's sort of spray and pray approach to targeted advertising. But

00:27:26.768 --> 00:27:30.010
<v Sara Dalsfelt>the sophistication means messages

00:27:30.350 --> 00:27:34.140
<v Sara Dalsfelt>right on time, where they still feel nudging and not like,

00:27:34.850 --> 00:27:38.670
<v Sara Dalsfelt>big brother is watching me, right? And this is where e commerce for travel

00:27:38.740 --> 00:27:42.494
<v Sara Dalsfelt>agencies have done amazingly well. So the first ad that my show

00:27:42.532 --> 00:27:45.790
<v Sara Dalsfelt>is going to, it's going to be like a couple

00:27:45.940 --> 00:27:49.602
<v Sara Dalsfelt>experience going to the Maldives, right? They show the turquoise water,

00:27:49.656 --> 00:27:53.170
<v Sara Dalsfelt>they show the villa, they show the champagne on the beach, and it's just like

00:27:53.240 --> 00:27:56.694
<v Sara Dalsfelt>setting the scene. The first ad is like, we have a package deal for you

00:27:56.732 --> 00:28:00.566
<v Sara Dalsfelt>going to the Maldives. They know this is not where you buy, but this is

00:28:00.588 --> 00:28:03.810
<v Sara Dalsfelt>where someone in your reptile brain,

00:28:03.890 --> 00:28:07.574
<v Sara Dalsfelt>something might be registered. Right?

00:28:07.772 --> 00:28:11.594
<v Sara Dalsfelt>Three days later, they show, oh, so this is

00:28:11.632 --> 00:28:15.386
<v Sara Dalsfelt>a kids free hotel. It's for couples looking to get away,

00:28:15.568 --> 00:28:19.366
<v Sara Dalsfelt>having their old bungalow. It's really, like, targeted towards you and perhaps

00:28:19.398 --> 00:28:22.954
<v Sara Dalsfelt>your wife, because they know, right? Fourth day, fifth

00:28:23.002 --> 00:28:26.398
<v Sara Dalsfelt>day, it's a family testimonial, or in this case, a couple

00:28:26.484 --> 00:28:30.334
<v Sara Dalsfelt>testimonial. Yes, it was kids free. I got all the free

00:28:30.372 --> 00:28:34.162
<v Sara Dalsfelt>massages that I wanted. It was so much rest for me. I had

00:28:34.296 --> 00:28:37.538
<v Sara Dalsfelt>the best time ever. Five ratings, right? Day

00:28:37.624 --> 00:28:40.962
<v Sara Dalsfelt>ten, there comes the booking.com review.

00:28:41.096 --> 00:28:44.850
<v Sara Dalsfelt>Like, ten stars. Best reviews ever. A lot of

00:28:44.920 --> 00:28:48.742
<v Sara Dalsfelt>couples love this destination. It was worth all the money ever.

00:28:48.876 --> 00:28:52.374
<v Sara Dalsfelt>We would never regret this. Yada, yada, yada. And on day

00:28:52.412 --> 00:28:56.194
<v Sara Dalsfelt>14, you get the last ad in the sequence

00:28:56.242 --> 00:28:59.130
<v Sara Dalsfelt>of storytelling with a 20% discount.

00:29:00.590 --> 00:29:04.250
<v Sara Dalsfelt>Last chance to buy. Would you believe

00:29:04.400 --> 00:29:07.994
<v Sara Dalsfelt>they would sell the same amount of travel packages on the first

00:29:08.032 --> 00:29:11.694
<v Sara Dalsfelt>ad versus the last ad? I can believe that. Because the people

00:29:11.732 --> 00:29:15.306
<v Joanne Lockwood>have different buyer journeys, different buyer experiences, different impulses.

00:29:15.418 --> 00:29:19.038
<v Sara Dalsfelt>Exactly. So every one is going to

00:29:19.044 --> 00:29:22.414
<v Joanne Lockwood>peel people off, depart, and then

00:29:22.612 --> 00:29:26.386
<v Joanne Lockwood>no doubt, the last one, that's not give up. That's just pause and

00:29:26.408 --> 00:29:30.242
<v Joanne Lockwood>come back later, isn't it? You don't give up completely. Exactly. It can always

00:29:30.296 --> 00:29:34.094
<v Sara Dalsfelt>be retargeted. And they know that. The couple testimonial

00:29:34.142 --> 00:29:37.480
<v Sara Dalsfelt>ad you've sent to your wife, like, hey,

00:29:37.930 --> 00:29:41.634
<v Sara Dalsfelt>aren't we worth this? We're worth this. And then the questioning

00:29:41.682 --> 00:29:45.302
<v Sara Dalsfelt>start happening and you guys could start picturing yourself going

00:29:45.356 --> 00:29:49.078
<v Sara Dalsfelt>there. So once you get the last message, the

00:29:49.084 --> 00:29:52.586
<v Sara Dalsfelt>last ad, the last storytelling experience, it's a no go.

00:29:52.768 --> 00:29:56.314
<v Sara Dalsfelt>And that's how we like to approach talent attraction as well. We need to build

00:29:56.352 --> 00:30:00.162
<v Sara Dalsfelt>a storytelling experience to sell them their new lifestyle,

00:30:00.246 --> 00:30:03.710
<v Sara Dalsfelt>their new life work, life balance. All these

00:30:03.780 --> 00:30:07.040
<v Sara Dalsfelt>arguments that are selling the position and selling their new

00:30:07.890 --> 00:30:11.614
<v Sara Dalsfelt>potential job. And it should be as timed as

00:30:11.732 --> 00:30:15.506
<v Sara Dalsfelt>the Monday, you go in and you actually have

00:30:15.528 --> 00:30:19.346
<v Sara Dalsfelt>a bad meeting with your manager and like, damn it, I'd never get

00:30:19.368 --> 00:30:23.106
<v Sara Dalsfelt>my will through. Whatever. And bam, there's the ad. Find a

00:30:23.128 --> 00:30:26.500
<v Sara Dalsfelt>date to apply, let's go. Yeah,

00:30:27.350 --> 00:30:31.080
<v Joanne Lockwood>it's being there, being ready. And you say spear fishing, right at the point

00:30:32.170 --> 00:30:35.926
<v Joanne Lockwood>on that cusp of being passive active, isn't it? It's no point, right? And

00:30:35.948 --> 00:30:39.586
<v Sara Dalsfelt>I like to see it as window of opportunity. So when someone actually is turning

00:30:39.618 --> 00:30:43.434
<v Sara Dalsfelt>active, you better work. The solution better work

00:30:43.472 --> 00:30:46.890
<v Sara Dalsfelt>for you. So, as you can tell, I love this topic and coming back to

00:30:46.960 --> 00:30:50.794
<v Sara Dalsfelt>inclusive hiring strategies, there's so much we can do, there's so much

00:30:50.832 --> 00:30:54.462
<v Sara Dalsfelt>tools in our hands, there's so much knowledge, and there's never been a better

00:30:54.516 --> 00:30:58.222
<v Sara Dalsfelt>case for conscious inclusion and making sure

00:30:58.276 --> 00:31:02.046
<v Sara Dalsfelt>you're hiring people who can bring their authentic selves to work. That is where

00:31:02.068 --> 00:31:05.794
<v Sara Dalsfelt>we are. And adway, we've been inspired by so many

00:31:05.832 --> 00:31:09.406
<v Sara Dalsfelt>of you guys, every advocate and profile,

00:31:09.518 --> 00:31:13.234
<v Sara Dalsfelt>educating the market, and we just believe we have the tech and

00:31:13.272 --> 00:31:17.046
<v Sara Dalsfelt>solution to actually activate it and making it real and

00:31:17.068 --> 00:31:20.774
<v Sara Dalsfelt>not just keeping it as a good quote. We

00:31:20.812 --> 00:31:24.326
<v Sara Dalsfelt>want to change how we work. We want to change and make sure we have

00:31:24.348 --> 00:31:27.958
<v Sara Dalsfelt>the tools operating currently. So

00:31:28.044 --> 00:31:31.466
<v Joanne Lockwood>you're in the majority working with forward thinking companies

00:31:31.648 --> 00:31:35.478
<v Joanne Lockwood>who kind of plugged into this, who get it. There's

00:31:35.494 --> 00:31:38.650
<v Joanne Lockwood>still the rest of the world that is operating

00:31:39.070 --> 00:31:42.766
<v Joanne Lockwood>on a different modus operandi. And you know as well as I do

00:31:42.788 --> 00:31:46.506
<v Joanne Lockwood>that the challenge is the cost per hire, the speed

00:31:46.538 --> 00:31:50.160
<v Joanne Lockwood>of hire, the experience, all those kind of things. And

00:31:50.770 --> 00:31:54.034
<v Joanne Lockwood>whenever I'm talking to organisations, the frustration is

00:31:54.072 --> 00:31:57.394
<v Joanne Lockwood>around getting people into the funnel of

00:31:57.432 --> 00:32:01.186
<v Joanne Lockwood>a broadest demographic. Possible. Exactly. In

00:32:01.208 --> 00:32:04.846
<v Joanne Lockwood>a cost effective way. So let's just talk about the people who haven't

00:32:04.878 --> 00:32:08.646
<v Joanne Lockwood>found the light just yet. And that's a challenge, because what we end up

00:32:08.668 --> 00:32:12.198
<v Joanne Lockwood>doing is we end up using traditional recruitment processes with

00:32:12.364 --> 00:32:15.794
<v Joanne Lockwood>a non diverse and non broad demographic talent

00:32:15.842 --> 00:32:19.526
<v Joanne Lockwood>pool, wondering why we're not getting the output from

00:32:19.548 --> 00:32:23.034
<v Joanne Lockwood>that pipeline. True. Or enough candidates to give you

00:32:23.072 --> 00:32:26.906
<v Joanne Lockwood>choice across a broad demographic. That's the challenge, isn't it?

00:32:27.008 --> 00:32:30.806
<v Joanne Lockwood>And it's around getting the people in the funnel. And you're saying this passive active

00:32:30.838 --> 00:32:34.586
<v Joanne Lockwood>window of opportunity is a way of getting people into the top of funnel

00:32:34.698 --> 00:32:38.506
<v Joanne Lockwood>and then doing something with it. So let's talk about I've

00:32:38.538 --> 00:32:42.218
<v Joanne Lockwood>clicked. Yeah, I want the air fry, I want the holiday, I want the couple's

00:32:42.234 --> 00:32:46.018
<v Joanne Lockwood>retreat, I want that new handbag, that pair of shoes. I definitely got to

00:32:46.024 --> 00:32:49.762
<v Joanne Lockwood>have that pair. So I've clicked. What

00:32:49.816 --> 00:32:53.074
<v Joanne Lockwood>should my candidate experience be like from that point

00:32:53.112 --> 00:32:56.514
<v Joanne Lockwood>forward? So I want to advocate that the

00:32:56.552 --> 00:33:00.102
<v Sara Dalsfelt>expectation here, even if it's a handbag, even if

00:33:00.156 --> 00:33:03.942
<v Sara Dalsfelt>it's the travel, even if it's the air fryer, is

00:33:03.996 --> 00:33:07.640
<v Sara Dalsfelt>that you do not want to leave the form.

00:33:08.010 --> 00:33:11.802
<v Sara Dalsfelt>And by form, I want to say, when you click on an ad, what.

00:33:11.856 --> 00:33:15.354
<v Sara Dalsfelt>Should happen is you called straight in to the

00:33:15.392 --> 00:33:18.890
<v Sara Dalsfelt>application form. In this case, it should be as easy as

00:33:18.960 --> 00:33:22.666
<v Sara Dalsfelt>submitting a lead. For instance, Joe, you pressed a

00:33:22.688 --> 00:33:26.474
<v Sara Dalsfelt>job ad from adway. What should happen and what does happen with our talent

00:33:26.522 --> 00:33:30.014
<v Sara Dalsfelt>attraction suite is you get a question like, would you like to

00:33:30.052 --> 00:33:33.630
<v Sara Dalsfelt>register interest or would you like to apply? You only

00:33:33.700 --> 00:33:37.378
<v Sara Dalsfelt>need to submit your email to actually

00:33:37.464 --> 00:33:41.154
<v Sara Dalsfelt>be in the loop. And this is where a lot of ta teams and

00:33:41.192 --> 00:33:44.962
<v Sara Dalsfelt>hiring teams get stuff wrong, because the old way of looking

00:33:45.016 --> 00:33:48.854
<v Sara Dalsfelt>in hiring is we don't want a lot of work to

00:33:48.892 --> 00:33:52.566
<v Sara Dalsfelt>go through. Like that's the old way of looking. I would

00:33:52.588 --> 00:33:56.434
<v Sara Dalsfelt>even argue that most hiring processes is built to weed

00:33:56.482 --> 00:33:59.900
<v Sara Dalsfelt>out, not include versus today

00:34:00.270 --> 00:34:04.058
<v Sara Dalsfelt>you have to broaden your perspective. You have to have a process

00:34:04.144 --> 00:34:07.978
<v Sara Dalsfelt>that includes. That means if Joe has a

00:34:07.984 --> 00:34:11.694
<v Sara Dalsfelt>window of opportunity, you have to meet that and you have to make

00:34:11.732 --> 00:34:15.310
<v Sara Dalsfelt>it super, like, stupidly super easy

00:34:15.460 --> 00:34:19.086
<v Sara Dalsfelt>to capture this interest. Which means one click

00:34:19.268 --> 00:34:22.750
<v Sara Dalsfelt>is what needs in the initial phase, then

00:34:22.900 --> 00:34:26.450
<v Sara Dalsfelt>it should be a gamified experience. So, for instance, what we built

00:34:26.520 --> 00:34:30.226
<v Sara Dalsfelt>is you stay in the ad, you submit your email, then you

00:34:30.248 --> 00:34:34.014
<v Sara Dalsfelt>can leave. We don't need anything more from you. We can retarget

00:34:34.062 --> 00:34:37.766
<v Sara Dalsfelt>you and we can say, hey, Joe, remember you applied for head of

00:34:37.788 --> 00:34:41.634
<v Sara Dalsfelt>the universe at Tesla, head of universal Tesla,

00:34:41.682 --> 00:34:45.526
<v Sara Dalsfelt>right? Great role for you, Joe. Then you get a ping notification or an

00:34:45.548 --> 00:34:49.382
<v Sara Dalsfelt>email or an ad, whatever you like, an SMS, a text, could be anything

00:34:49.516 --> 00:34:53.114
<v Sara Dalsfelt>saying, well, you've only submitted 20% of the information

00:34:53.312 --> 00:34:57.130
<v Sara Dalsfelt>to become a great hire for Tesla. Would you like to just include three

00:34:57.200 --> 00:35:00.858
<v Sara Dalsfelt>screening questions and then you're 100% done. So it's a

00:35:00.864 --> 00:35:04.334
<v Sara Dalsfelt>gamified experience. Either you stay in the ad and you just fill

00:35:04.452 --> 00:35:08.126
<v Sara Dalsfelt>know if it's screening questions or know the employer of

00:35:08.148 --> 00:35:11.950
<v Sara Dalsfelt>choice tesla have chosen to fill in to make your hiring process,

00:35:12.100 --> 00:35:15.450
<v Sara Dalsfelt>or you leave the form and come back when you have the time. Because you

00:35:15.460 --> 00:35:19.106
<v Sara Dalsfelt>might be on the subway, you might be in the supermarket, you might be in

00:35:19.128 --> 00:35:22.834
<v Sara Dalsfelt>the bathroom. So there's always alternatives to when you

00:35:22.872 --> 00:35:26.290
<v Sara Dalsfelt>submit and come back. But capturing the first interest is

00:35:26.360 --> 00:35:30.034
<v Sara Dalsfelt>vital, the first window of opportunity you have to capture.

00:35:30.082 --> 00:35:33.766
<v Sara Dalsfelt>Then you can always push the candidate to update their

00:35:33.788 --> 00:35:37.366
<v Sara Dalsfelt>profile. In this case, it's not a profile, but it's still an

00:35:37.388 --> 00:35:41.098
<v Sara Dalsfelt>application for head of universus Tesla. You don't have to create an account, but you

00:35:41.104 --> 00:35:44.918
<v Sara Dalsfelt>can still be submitting your profile to the talent

00:35:44.934 --> 00:35:48.746
<v Sara Dalsfelt>pool of this role, right? Or you stay in the form, you add your

00:35:48.768 --> 00:35:52.106
<v Sara Dalsfelt>email and you answer a few questions, making sure

00:35:52.288 --> 00:35:55.966
<v Sara Dalsfelt>the most relevant information come through, right? We don't need

00:35:55.988 --> 00:35:59.582
<v Sara Dalsfelt>poster code, we don't need that. We just need to make sure that you

00:35:59.636 --> 00:36:03.262
<v Sara Dalsfelt>perhaps live in France if this is the case for know, these

00:36:03.316 --> 00:36:07.018
<v Sara Dalsfelt>factors are really built into the specific employer and the

00:36:07.044 --> 00:36:10.706
<v Sara Dalsfelt>specific role, but I'm trying to say it in an example. Right, so the experience

00:36:10.808 --> 00:36:14.210
<v Sara Dalsfelt>should be one click. You should be in the ad, there should be no

00:36:14.280 --> 00:36:17.654
<v Sara Dalsfelt>fluffy 1 billion clicks through a

00:36:17.692 --> 00:36:20.070
<v Sara Dalsfelt>form which is not mobile

00:36:21.050 --> 00:36:24.822
<v Sara Dalsfelt>assessed or it's not built for mobile friendly, should be no

00:36:24.876 --> 00:36:28.694
<v Sara Dalsfelt>account created, should be ideally not a single cover

00:36:28.732 --> 00:36:32.362
<v Sara Dalsfelt>letter or CV uploaded either. It should be a super

00:36:32.416 --> 00:36:35.530
<v Sara Dalsfelt>smooth journey based on finding potential with

00:36:35.680 --> 00:36:39.402
<v Sara Dalsfelt>assessments and tests and screening based on science in order to really

00:36:39.456 --> 00:36:43.178
<v Sara Dalsfelt>make sure what's getting through is relevant for this role

00:36:43.274 --> 00:36:46.682
<v Sara Dalsfelt>and that you are opening up for potential and transferable

00:36:46.746 --> 00:36:50.154
<v Sara Dalsfelt>skills and everything that you need in order for have a thriving workforce.

00:36:50.202 --> 00:36:54.010
<v Sara Dalsfelt>Right, so, same as with Airfire. One, two clicks,

00:36:54.090 --> 00:36:57.762
<v Sara Dalsfelt>super secure, easy checkout, making sure my bank details is all

00:36:57.816 --> 00:37:01.614
<v Sara Dalsfelt>secured. I don't feel stressed about this decision. I have to have an immediate

00:37:01.662 --> 00:37:05.282
<v Sara Dalsfelt>confirmation. You did a great job, Joe. The airfire is coming.

00:37:05.336 --> 00:37:08.886
<v Sara Dalsfelt>Or thank you so much. We have everything we need in order to process you

00:37:08.908 --> 00:37:12.578
<v Sara Dalsfelt>further for Head of Universal Tesla, and that should be the canned

00:37:12.594 --> 00:37:16.338
<v Sara Dalsfelt>experience and you should then continue with your life, keep scrolling instagram

00:37:16.514 --> 00:37:20.234
<v Sara Dalsfelt>and go have dinner with your family. But

00:37:20.272 --> 00:37:24.026
<v Joanne Lockwood>we know that isn't the typical candidate experience in the world, is

00:37:24.048 --> 00:37:27.820
<v Joanne Lockwood>it? We know that's a very curated, very

00:37:28.190 --> 00:37:31.434
<v Joanne Lockwood>contemporary, forward thinking way of dealing with things. But candidates

00:37:31.482 --> 00:37:35.134
<v Joanne Lockwood>generally have a very poor experience. I'm sure many

00:37:35.172 --> 00:37:38.926
<v Joanne Lockwood>people listening here have been experienced. The Blunder Bus approach on

00:37:38.948 --> 00:37:42.734
<v Joanne Lockwood>LinkedIn, recruiters sending us, are you interested

00:37:42.772 --> 00:37:46.494
<v Joanne Lockwood>in this, are you interested in that? Or you look great for this role,

00:37:46.622 --> 00:37:50.050
<v Joanne Lockwood>picking something that you did 20 years ago as a keyword,

00:37:51.350 --> 00:37:54.994
<v Joanne Lockwood>that's still the candidate experience. We've gone out there and it

00:37:55.032 --> 00:37:58.806
<v Joanne Lockwood>builds a lack of trust into the recruiting process. And I believe it's like

00:37:58.828 --> 00:38:02.662
<v Sara Dalsfelt>it's no blame on the recruiters, no blame on people

00:38:02.716 --> 00:38:06.454
<v Sara Dalsfelt>just trying because they're so pressured. Like, there's an insane amount

00:38:06.492 --> 00:38:09.714
<v Sara Dalsfelt>of pressure on recruiters right now. They're supposed to be AI engineers,

00:38:09.842 --> 00:38:13.594
<v Sara Dalsfelt>marketing experts, sales experts, like, all these. There's so much

00:38:13.632 --> 00:38:16.506
<v Sara Dalsfelt>pressure on them. But what I do want to challenge and what I like to

00:38:16.528 --> 00:38:20.370
<v Sara Dalsfelt>discuss is how come we're not valuing our candidates

00:38:20.470 --> 00:38:24.062
<v Sara Dalsfelt>and building processes and experience just as we would with

00:38:24.116 --> 00:38:27.374
<v Sara Dalsfelt>super valuable customers? Because it's the

00:38:27.412 --> 00:38:30.782
<v Sara Dalsfelt>same. Imagine, again, an ecommerce, a travel

00:38:30.836 --> 00:38:34.610
<v Sara Dalsfelt>agency, treating their desired customers

00:38:34.760 --> 00:38:37.730
<v Sara Dalsfelt>like most companies does with their candidates

00:38:40.070 --> 00:38:43.614
<v Sara Dalsfelt>in revenue loss. Just imagine the figures in revenue

00:38:43.662 --> 00:38:47.374
<v Sara Dalsfelt>loss and it's not like in terms of buying

00:38:47.422 --> 00:38:50.582
<v Sara Dalsfelt>stuff or being a customer, I could still go

00:38:50.636 --> 00:38:54.438
<v Sara Dalsfelt>back some years later and like, I want air fryer. Like, I don't care,

00:38:54.524 --> 00:38:58.326
<v Sara Dalsfelt>it's a good deal, I'm going to buy it. I'm not that sceptical about the

00:38:58.348 --> 00:39:02.026
<v Sara Dalsfelt>brand selling the air fryer, but when it comes to hiring, if

00:39:02.048 --> 00:39:05.638
<v Sara Dalsfelt>I've had a bad experience with a brand, they're doomed.

00:39:05.814 --> 00:39:09.338
<v Sara Dalsfelt>They're out the majority of candidates will never apply

00:39:09.424 --> 00:39:13.120
<v Sara Dalsfelt>again. So it's not just that you're turning them off,

00:39:13.650 --> 00:39:17.466
<v Sara Dalsfelt>you're ending forever a relationship. And it's

00:39:17.498 --> 00:39:20.766
<v Sara Dalsfelt>not just a lot of people come to market saying there's no

00:39:20.788 --> 00:39:23.966
<v Sara Dalsfelt>candidates. How come you're thinking you're

00:39:23.998 --> 00:39:26.260
<v Sara Dalsfelt>sprinking each day

00:39:27.750 --> 00:39:31.394
<v Sara Dalsfelt>you're working against yourself? So I think the bigger question should

00:39:31.432 --> 00:39:35.122
<v Sara Dalsfelt>be, yes, of course, everyone should have the ideal can experience and everyone

00:39:35.176 --> 00:39:38.822
<v Sara Dalsfelt>should work with the best tech out there. But still, you have to

00:39:38.876 --> 00:39:42.386
<v Sara Dalsfelt>see and approach your candidates as valued

00:39:42.418 --> 00:39:46.134
<v Sara Dalsfelt>customers and you have to make sure that is the experience, else why

00:39:46.172 --> 00:39:47.430
<v Sara Dalsfelt>are you in recruitment?

00:39:52.190 --> 00:39:55.594
<v Joanne Lockwood>Most? I think I think 65, 70% of

00:39:55.712 --> 00:39:59.210
<v Joanne Lockwood>the UK workforce work for businesses that are

00:39:59.360 --> 00:40:02.794
<v Joanne Lockwood>ten people or less, or certainly small businesses, micro

00:40:02.842 --> 00:40:06.094
<v Joanne Lockwood>businesses. What we're talking about

00:40:06.132 --> 00:40:09.614
<v Joanne Lockwood>here is an enterprise. It's a

00:40:09.652 --> 00:40:13.242
<v Joanne Lockwood>corporate, large organisation budget,

00:40:13.306 --> 00:40:17.090
<v Joanne Lockwood>I guess. How do smaller organisations

00:40:18.230 --> 00:40:21.858
<v Joanne Lockwood>get into something like this? Because first of all, it's a

00:40:21.864 --> 00:40:24.974
<v Joanne Lockwood>mindset change, isn't it? Recruitment, marketing and what you're talking about is a real mindset

00:40:25.022 --> 00:40:28.754
<v Joanne Lockwood>change versus the old. I'll put it on typical

00:40:28.802 --> 00:40:32.614
<v Joanne Lockwood>job site and get thousands of applications from around the world

00:40:32.652 --> 00:40:36.278
<v Joanne Lockwood>that very few are actually relevant. We latch on

00:40:36.364 --> 00:40:39.800
<v Joanne Lockwood>the biases, kick in that person's name, that person's education.

00:40:40.650 --> 00:40:44.234
<v Joanne Lockwood>We're suddenly biassing and going, oh, look, there's a couple of white people

00:40:44.272 --> 00:40:47.994
<v Joanne Lockwood>here with English handing names who live in the local town. They'll be

00:40:48.032 --> 00:40:51.706
<v Joanne Lockwood>perfect. That's what goes on at the moment in the majority of the world, doesn't

00:40:51.738 --> 00:40:55.566
<v Joanne Lockwood>it? I want to

00:40:55.588 --> 00:40:59.390
<v Sara Dalsfelt>challenge when it comes to investing in

00:40:59.460 --> 00:41:03.294
<v Sara Dalsfelt>inclusive strategies or tech or platforms, it's like, what would

00:41:03.332 --> 00:41:06.962
<v Sara Dalsfelt>it cost you to not get this diverse workforce into

00:41:07.016 --> 00:41:10.802
<v Sara Dalsfelt>the company? Right? So that's always the calculation. But,

00:41:10.856 --> 00:41:14.494
<v Sara Dalsfelt>yes, we work with companies that are hiring for very complex

00:41:14.542 --> 00:41:18.226
<v Sara Dalsfelt>roles and volumes of roles that's like mainly our target audience,

00:41:18.338 --> 00:41:22.054
<v Sara Dalsfelt>but it still could be companies doing 30 hires a year if it's like

00:41:22.092 --> 00:41:25.782
<v Sara Dalsfelt>pharmacists or It specialists or salespeople or

00:41:25.916 --> 00:41:28.460
<v Sara Dalsfelt>service personnel or whatever. So

00:41:31.630 --> 00:41:35.434
<v Sara Dalsfelt>either way, because what I'm coming from

00:41:35.472 --> 00:41:39.146
<v Sara Dalsfelt>is I had this brilliant live stream yesterday on my LinkedIn Live channel together with

00:41:39.168 --> 00:41:41.870
<v Sara Dalsfelt>Wolfgang Brickwetter. He's an HR

00:41:42.290 --> 00:41:45.742
<v Sara Dalsfelt>specialist and recruitment experience person

00:41:45.876 --> 00:41:49.662
<v Sara Dalsfelt>from the Doc region, and he's been doing recruitment trends reports for

00:41:49.716 --> 00:41:53.546
<v Sara Dalsfelt>over 1015 years. And we went through a lot of benchmark

00:41:53.578 --> 00:41:56.778
<v Sara Dalsfelt>data because there's nothing we love more than benchmark data. And when it comes to,

00:41:56.804 --> 00:42:00.514
<v Sara Dalsfelt>like, what are the hiring budget or the marketing budget for this TA team,

00:42:00.552 --> 00:42:04.354
<v Sara Dalsfelt>or how much are they spending on these channels, or what's their average? And

00:42:04.392 --> 00:42:08.182
<v Sara Dalsfelt>we went through a lot of this data, and what was really

00:42:08.236 --> 00:42:11.730
<v Sara Dalsfelt>interesting was even if you have a super tight

00:42:11.810 --> 00:42:15.446
<v Sara Dalsfelt>budget for Bahuma marketing or employee branding, which you might have in the

00:42:15.468 --> 00:42:18.966
<v Sara Dalsfelt>times we're in, what you don't get is

00:42:19.068 --> 00:42:22.826
<v Sara Dalsfelt>the change here is in terms of what

00:42:22.848 --> 00:42:26.358
<v Sara Dalsfelt>I said before. You're not in a war for talent. You're a war for attention.

00:42:26.534 --> 00:42:30.306
<v Sara Dalsfelt>If you don't join the party now, it'll

00:42:30.358 --> 00:42:33.950
<v Sara Dalsfelt>be exponentially more expensive next year

00:42:34.100 --> 00:42:37.486
<v Sara Dalsfelt>and the year after that and the year after that. Because again,

00:42:37.588 --> 00:42:41.198
<v Sara Dalsfelt>everyone is going into social recruiting. Everyone

00:42:41.284 --> 00:42:44.654
<v Sara Dalsfelt>is understanding the need for the most epic candidate experience.

00:42:44.772 --> 00:42:48.466
<v Sara Dalsfelt>Everyone is investing in this and if you're not joining the party, you're out of

00:42:48.488 --> 00:42:52.306
<v Sara Dalsfelt>the game. So even with the tiniest recruitment marketing budget, and we looked into

00:42:52.328 --> 00:42:55.570
<v Sara Dalsfelt>this cool benchmark data, I can send you some then later joe,

00:42:55.990 --> 00:42:59.814
<v Sara Dalsfelt>even with the tiniest budget, you have to make sure these budgets are working the

00:42:59.852 --> 00:43:03.398
<v Sara Dalsfelt>most efficiently for you. Building the talent pools, optimising the

00:43:03.404 --> 00:43:07.250
<v Sara Dalsfelt>career page, not losing out on this valuable, relevant,

00:43:07.410 --> 00:43:10.966
<v Sara Dalsfelt>diverse traffic that you are driving in some way, even if it's

00:43:10.998 --> 00:43:14.342
<v Sara Dalsfelt>through search or outreach or automated

00:43:14.406 --> 00:43:18.198
<v Sara Dalsfelt>process. With recruitment marketing, you have to make sure these tiny budgets

00:43:18.214 --> 00:43:21.166
<v Sara Dalsfelt>work for you and you have to go where the candidates are. So I would

00:43:21.188 --> 00:43:24.686
<v Sara Dalsfelt>naturally argue never to put all your eggs in one

00:43:24.708 --> 00:43:28.186
<v Sara Dalsfelt>basket. My approach to hiring with tiny

00:43:28.218 --> 00:43:31.774
<v Sara Dalsfelt>budgets either way, is multichannel. You have

00:43:31.812 --> 00:43:35.330
<v Sara Dalsfelt>to understand that the persona the average social

00:43:35.400 --> 00:43:38.382
<v Sara Dalsfelt>media user has, I think it's on average

00:43:38.446 --> 00:43:41.714
<v Sara Dalsfelt>7.5 somi apps that they

00:43:41.752 --> 00:43:45.218
<v Sara Dalsfelt>use, so they live in a universe of social media,

00:43:45.304 --> 00:43:49.110
<v Sara Dalsfelt>meaning LinkedIn is not your golden or silver bullet,

00:43:49.610 --> 00:43:53.398
<v Sara Dalsfelt>meta is not your silver bullet. TikTok might not be a

00:43:53.404 --> 00:43:57.206
<v Sara Dalsfelt>silver bullet, but there is several platforms where people are living. And

00:43:57.228 --> 00:44:00.634
<v Sara Dalsfelt>if you build in a super smart tactic, you don't have to

00:44:00.672 --> 00:44:03.974
<v Sara Dalsfelt>spend billions of dollars in building these candidate

00:44:04.022 --> 00:44:07.638
<v Sara Dalsfelt>experiences. You just have to make sure that your EVP

00:44:07.814 --> 00:44:11.546
<v Sara Dalsfelt>is not be left for everyone to experience. Because who will

00:44:11.568 --> 00:44:14.010
<v Sara Dalsfelt>type in VVV?

00:44:14.510 --> 00:44:18.174
<v Sara Dalsfelt>Mycareepage mycareepage, my career? No

00:44:18.212 --> 00:44:21.886
<v Sara Dalsfelt>one. No one knows. And how would I even know that H M

00:44:21.988 --> 00:44:25.586
<v Sara Dalsfelt>is one of the biggest It employers in the world? I think of

00:44:25.608 --> 00:44:29.282
<v Sara Dalsfelt>H M as clothing, I don't think of H

00:44:29.336 --> 00:44:33.122
<v Sara Dalsfelt>M as AI engineers. Right? So I

00:44:33.176 --> 00:44:36.886
<v Sara Dalsfelt>wouldn't type in a career page because I would think H M is for

00:44:36.908 --> 00:44:40.646
<v Sara Dalsfelt>clothing. There's all these differences in terms of mindset and how

00:44:40.668 --> 00:44:44.338
<v Sara Dalsfelt>you have to approach shopping experience and online behaviour

00:44:44.434 --> 00:44:48.086
<v Sara Dalsfelt>into incorporating that, into talent attraction. So I would

00:44:48.108 --> 00:44:51.674
<v Sara Dalsfelt>still make sure my tiny budgets work for me,

00:44:51.872 --> 00:44:55.658
<v Sara Dalsfelt>making sure I can collect the audiences, I can retarget the audiences, and I

00:44:55.664 --> 00:44:59.066
<v Sara Dalsfelt>go broad on social media to make sure

00:44:59.168 --> 00:45:02.778
<v Sara Dalsfelt>I can attract diverse potential.

00:45:02.954 --> 00:45:06.762
<v Joanne Lockwood>So it starts this conversation with unearthing potential beyond the resume.

00:45:06.826 --> 00:45:10.602
<v Joanne Lockwood>The CV. Yes. So I'm a candidate, I've got a CV,

00:45:10.746 --> 00:45:14.546
<v Joanne Lockwood>I'm an employer, I want a CV. So how do I, as

00:45:14.568 --> 00:45:18.258
<v Joanne Lockwood>a candidate settle myself? Because the

00:45:18.264 --> 00:45:21.922
<v Joanne Lockwood>CV is a sales prospectus document. I actually

00:45:21.976 --> 00:45:25.650
<v Joanne Lockwood>want you to be biassed for me, so I actually want the right bias.

00:45:26.150 --> 00:45:29.634
<v Sara Dalsfelt>Isn't this so interesting? It's all made up from the beginning.

00:45:29.762 --> 00:45:33.574
<v Sara Dalsfelt>I can chat, GBT, everything, right? So it's not

00:45:33.612 --> 00:45:36.966
<v Sara Dalsfelt>even that's a problem. I want you to be biassed, but then

00:45:36.988 --> 00:45:40.826
<v Sara Dalsfelt>again, are you assessing me on my readiness and my

00:45:40.848 --> 00:45:44.618
<v Sara Dalsfelt>skills and everything that is me? So the whole thing, like the

00:45:44.624 --> 00:45:48.314
<v Sara Dalsfelt>whole show, the whole charade of a CV is made up on

00:45:48.432 --> 00:45:52.154
<v Sara Dalsfelt>non beneficial information for anyone, not

00:45:52.192 --> 00:45:55.806
<v Sara Dalsfelt>anyone. So good point, though, in terms of

00:45:55.988 --> 00:45:59.486
<v Sara Dalsfelt>how can I word you in this case, joe, you're going to challenge Tesla for

00:45:59.508 --> 00:46:02.910
<v Sara Dalsfelt>Head of Universe, right? You want Tesla to hire you without a CV.

00:46:03.510 --> 00:46:06.786
<v Sara Dalsfelt>What I encourage candidates to do is to actually

00:46:06.888 --> 00:46:10.498
<v Sara Dalsfelt>question one, are you giving everyone

00:46:10.584 --> 00:46:14.354
<v Sara Dalsfelt>the same chance for this job? Two,

00:46:14.552 --> 00:46:18.294
<v Sara Dalsfelt>include assessments and testing as early as

00:46:18.332 --> 00:46:22.070
<v Sara Dalsfelt>possible in the process. That means you're not weeding out

00:46:22.140 --> 00:46:25.798
<v Sara Dalsfelt>anything, you're building to include people

00:46:25.884 --> 00:46:29.174
<v Sara Dalsfelt>and give everyone the chance. And as long as you explain,

00:46:29.372 --> 00:46:33.098
<v Sara Dalsfelt>it's super easy to have a little box of information in your

00:46:33.184 --> 00:46:37.002
<v Sara Dalsfelt>online application journey saying, hey, we're putting our tests super early

00:46:37.056 --> 00:46:40.506
<v Sara Dalsfelt>in the funnel because we want everyone given the same chance. You as well, make

00:46:40.528 --> 00:46:44.234
<v Sara Dalsfelt>sure this will take you five minutes, sit somewhere comfortable, take a coffee

00:46:44.282 --> 00:46:47.834
<v Sara Dalsfelt>and let's get started with a test. Make sure it's

00:46:47.882 --> 00:46:50.590
<v Sara Dalsfelt>built to include, not to exclude.

00:46:51.570 --> 00:46:52.800
<v Sara Dalsfelt>And from there,

00:46:56.710 --> 00:46:59.618
<v Sara Dalsfelt>if you want to use your gut feeling or if you want to have a

00:46:59.624 --> 00:47:02.980
<v Sara Dalsfelt>look at a CV, do that later. Again,

00:47:03.750 --> 00:47:07.458
<v Sara Dalsfelt>I always advocate and everyone does this, I believe the community is great.

00:47:07.624 --> 00:47:11.000
<v Sara Dalsfelt>We always talk about challenging hiring managers and I don't think

00:47:11.850 --> 00:47:15.558
<v Sara Dalsfelt>no recruiter ever on this earth have missed the fact that you have to be

00:47:15.564 --> 00:47:19.254
<v Sara Dalsfelt>a strategic business partner. I believe everyone knows this, and I believe everyone does

00:47:19.292 --> 00:47:23.082
<v Sara Dalsfelt>what they can about this, but it's still if you've done everything

00:47:23.136 --> 00:47:26.826
<v Sara Dalsfelt>right from the beginning opened up the

00:47:26.848 --> 00:47:30.506
<v Sara Dalsfelt>funnel, making sure you have automated an assessment and testing tools, making sure it's not

00:47:30.528 --> 00:47:34.014
<v Sara Dalsfelt>heavy lifting, but you're still processing relevant talent pools. So when

00:47:34.052 --> 00:47:37.774
<v Sara Dalsfelt>you get involved, it's still relevant to the role. And for

00:47:37.812 --> 00:47:41.438
<v Sara Dalsfelt>diversity? Meaning if you've done everything right,

00:47:41.524 --> 00:47:45.314
<v Sara Dalsfelt>your funnel is built on the best possible, inclusive way, you will end up

00:47:45.352 --> 00:47:49.134
<v Sara Dalsfelt>with five equal good candidates.

00:47:49.262 --> 00:47:52.962
<v Sara Dalsfelt>So if a hiring manager must, in this world,

00:47:53.096 --> 00:47:56.790
<v Sara Dalsfelt>use their gut feeling, they can I mean, I'm not recommending it,

00:47:56.860 --> 00:48:00.440
<v Sara Dalsfelt>but as a last step on paper, they can,

00:48:01.370 --> 00:48:04.902
<v Sara Dalsfelt>right? Because you've built the process, securing that

00:48:04.956 --> 00:48:08.794
<v Sara Dalsfelt>potential and diverse applicants had

00:48:08.832 --> 00:48:12.054
<v Sara Dalsfelt>the chance to come through all the way to the last submission.

00:48:12.102 --> 00:48:15.834
<v Sara Dalsfelt>Right? So that is

00:48:15.872 --> 00:48:17.420
<v Sara Dalsfelt>my whole thinking. I believe

00:48:19.390 --> 00:48:22.958
<v Sara Dalsfelt>you have to challenge the fact

00:48:23.124 --> 00:48:26.894
<v Sara Dalsfelt>how employers are assessing you. And I know this is

00:48:26.932 --> 00:48:30.718
<v Sara Dalsfelt>happening today just as review sites or glassdoor or

00:48:30.724 --> 00:48:34.498
<v Sara Dalsfelt>whatever, transparency into the hiring process is happening and it's going

00:48:34.504 --> 00:48:37.982
<v Sara Dalsfelt>to blow up more than ever. But candidates are challenging

00:48:38.046 --> 00:48:41.714
<v Sara Dalsfelt>employers how they're assessed and how they're measured, on how

00:48:41.752 --> 00:48:44.740
<v Sara Dalsfelt>they're a match for this opportunity.

00:48:45.510 --> 00:48:48.200
<v Sara Dalsfelt>And I believe we should be prepared and we should definitely

00:48:48.570 --> 00:48:52.406
<v Sara Dalsfelt>proactively approach the candidate market with this. And we want

00:48:52.428 --> 00:48:56.134
<v Sara Dalsfelt>to make sure that we don't build or

00:48:56.172 --> 00:48:59.538
<v Sara Dalsfelt>go back to this charade where someone has a charade

00:48:59.554 --> 00:49:03.302
<v Sara Dalsfelt>application paper in their hands and I have a charade

00:49:03.446 --> 00:49:06.806
<v Sara Dalsfelt>assessment strategy where I spend 6 seconds

00:49:06.998 --> 00:49:10.106
<v Sara Dalsfelt>sifting through a CV and like, hey, it's a good match. Yeah, I can read

00:49:10.128 --> 00:49:13.600
<v Sara Dalsfelt>his name. Perfect. No picture, not going to use it. Right?

00:49:14.130 --> 00:49:17.966
<v Sara Dalsfelt>So there needs to be challenge, the whole thing needs to be

00:49:17.988 --> 00:49:21.342
<v Sara Dalsfelt>challenged from both ends. And I believe

00:49:21.396 --> 00:49:25.214
<v Sara Dalsfelt>employers have to have the answer. Why are you assessing me on my

00:49:25.252 --> 00:49:28.666
<v Sara Dalsfelt>cover letter? Have to have the answer.

00:49:28.788 --> 00:49:32.606
<v Joanne Lockwood>Yes, the ability to write a word document shouldn't be the basis on your. Ability

00:49:32.638 --> 00:49:36.342
<v Sara Dalsfelt>to rule the universe with generative AI. We're like, there's no

00:49:36.396 --> 00:49:39.910
<v Sara Dalsfelt>substance. Mean, imagine

00:49:40.410 --> 00:49:44.054
<v Sara Dalsfelt>the risk Tesla would take with you, Joanne. Not with

00:49:44.092 --> 00:49:47.686
<v Sara Dalsfelt>you, of course, but I meant with your cover letter built on chat GPT for

00:49:47.708 --> 00:49:51.466
<v Sara Dalsfelt>Head of Universe. Imagine the risk if they were to assess you

00:49:51.488 --> 00:49:55.258
<v Sara Dalsfelt>on this piece of paper that you've been creating. Five minutes

00:49:55.344 --> 00:49:59.110
<v Sara Dalsfelt>with Generative AI. It's no substance, it's no relevance, it's

00:49:59.190 --> 00:50:02.874
<v Sara Dalsfelt>nothing. So I think the whole thing should be challenged

00:50:02.922 --> 00:50:06.350
<v Sara Dalsfelt>from both ends. So this process is

00:50:06.420 --> 00:50:10.046
<v Joanne Lockwood>completely fair. It's bias, it's mitigated as much as we

00:50:10.068 --> 00:50:13.614
<v Joanne Lockwood>can based on behaviours, it's based on competency, it's based on

00:50:13.652 --> 00:50:17.426
<v Joanne Lockwood>potential, not based on yesterday, it's based on tomorrow. All the kind

00:50:17.448 --> 00:50:21.218
<v Joanne Lockwood>of great things we know. But if my organisation has

00:50:21.384 --> 00:50:25.146
<v Joanne Lockwood>a gender equity problem, a pay gap problem, disability

00:50:25.278 --> 00:50:28.200
<v Joanne Lockwood>gap problem, or an ethnicity problem,

00:50:28.890 --> 00:50:32.594
<v Joanne Lockwood>if I can't bias the process towards female

00:50:32.642 --> 00:50:35.910
<v Joanne Lockwood>hires, or towards people of colour, or towards people with disability,

00:50:36.330 --> 00:50:40.106
<v Joanne Lockwood>I'll keep hiring, probably in the same ratio, or I

00:50:40.128 --> 00:50:43.894
<v Joanne Lockwood>won't change the ratio enough to fix my gap. Fix my ratio. The leaking

00:50:43.942 --> 00:50:47.610
<v Sara Dalsfelt>bucket. How do I

00:50:47.680 --> 00:50:51.402
<v Joanne Lockwood>influence the funnel? Naturally? I mean, this is the big

00:50:51.456 --> 00:50:55.054
<v Sara Dalsfelt>question, right? And I believe there's so many great people out

00:50:55.092 --> 00:50:58.510
<v Sara Dalsfelt>there discussing this and having the best answers ever.

00:50:58.580 --> 00:51:01.742
<v Sara Dalsfelt>But of course you can't fill a leaking bucket with

00:51:01.796 --> 00:51:05.602
<v Sara Dalsfelt>relevant applications if there's no foundation or

00:51:05.656 --> 00:51:09.234
<v Sara Dalsfelt>environmental support for them to stay and thrive, right?

00:51:09.432 --> 00:51:11.730
<v Sara Dalsfelt>So you have to look internally.

00:51:13.750 --> 00:51:17.126
<v Sara Dalsfelt>Everyone is like you have to start with this first. I want to challenge and

00:51:17.148 --> 00:51:20.934
<v Sara Dalsfelt>say that you can have two thoughts in your brain at once. We

00:51:20.972 --> 00:51:24.662
<v Sara Dalsfelt>can have parallel activities happening, right? So there should

00:51:24.716 --> 00:51:28.490
<v Sara Dalsfelt>always be an ongoing strategy and work for making

00:51:28.560 --> 00:51:32.234
<v Sara Dalsfelt>sure everyone feel that they can turn up to work as their

00:51:32.272 --> 00:51:35.866
<v Sara Dalsfelt>authentic self, they're supported as their authentic self,

00:51:35.968 --> 00:51:39.580
<v Sara Dalsfelt>or as I said, unapologetically myself, right?

00:51:40.430 --> 00:51:44.090
<v Joanne Lockwood>We're talking about here is the employee experience, the retention

00:51:44.170 --> 00:51:47.840
<v Joanne Lockwood>element. Get my retention, get my employee experience, right?

00:51:48.290 --> 00:51:51.930
<v Joanne Lockwood>Primarily. Then go to market that's with air fryer Joe.

00:51:52.010 --> 00:51:55.710
<v Sara Dalsfelt>What if I send you the shittiest old McDonald's

00:51:55.870 --> 00:51:59.506
<v Sara Dalsfelt>frying super stinky thing to you and like, eh, it's an air

00:51:59.528 --> 00:52:03.266
<v Sara Dalsfelt>fryer, whatever. It doesn't matter if you had the best online experience,

00:52:03.368 --> 00:52:07.166
<v Sara Dalsfelt>right, if the product, if the reality then is

00:52:07.208 --> 00:52:10.790
<v Sara Dalsfelt>met with a fraud. Right. So obviously,

00:52:10.940 --> 00:52:14.518
<v Sara Dalsfelt>obviously you have to clean your house first, obviously. And you have to

00:52:14.604 --> 00:52:18.378
<v Sara Dalsfelt>where you I believe what you're doing, Joanne, is making

00:52:18.464 --> 00:52:21.306
<v Sara Dalsfelt>sure this is incorporated into the business,

00:52:21.408 --> 00:52:25.098
<v Sara Dalsfelt>OKRs? It's not just a value proposition, it's not just a

00:52:25.104 --> 00:52:28.394
<v Sara Dalsfelt>ta KPI, it's incorporated into our business

00:52:28.512 --> 00:52:30.460
<v Sara Dalsfelt>KPIs. And this is ever

00:52:33.710 --> 00:52:37.534
<v Sara Dalsfelt>have in terms of seasons. You could have a season of

00:52:37.572 --> 00:52:41.246
<v Sara Dalsfelt>great hiring and great thriving and people staying for

00:52:41.268 --> 00:52:44.994
<v Sara Dalsfelt>long, but then all of a sudden a whole department would quit because

00:52:45.032 --> 00:52:48.574
<v Sara Dalsfelt>of XYZ and you have no diverse

00:52:48.622 --> 00:52:52.082
<v Sara Dalsfelt>representation at all because of XYZ. So this is ever

00:52:52.136 --> 00:52:55.814
<v Sara Dalsfelt>ongoing and no, naturally, you cannot build the best

00:52:55.852 --> 00:52:59.154
<v Sara Dalsfelt>online experience for candidates if it's met with the worst

00:52:59.282 --> 00:53:02.994
<v Sara Dalsfelt>offline experience. I mean, that's just a waste of everyone's

00:53:03.042 --> 00:53:05.750
<v Sara Dalsfelt>time, money and happiness.

00:53:09.610 --> 00:53:12.778
<v Joanne Lockwood>I think what I'm hearing saying is you got to get yourself right. You got

00:53:12.784 --> 00:53:16.598
<v Joanne Lockwood>to be a look in the mirror. You're selling who you are. You're

00:53:16.614 --> 00:53:20.206
<v Joanne Lockwood>not selling something fake and inauthentic. You got to be walking the

00:53:20.228 --> 00:53:23.566
<v Joanne Lockwood>talk anthropologically yourselves as an

00:53:23.588 --> 00:53:27.342
<v Joanne Lockwood>organisation, but that still says you've got a 70

00:53:27.396 --> 00:53:29.550
<v Joanne Lockwood>30 gender ratio.

00:53:31.090 --> 00:53:34.846
<v Joanne Lockwood>In my mind, you got to hire two women for every men, every man, otherwise

00:53:35.038 --> 00:53:38.274
<v Joanne Lockwood>you're not either not fixing the problem or the problem is getting

00:53:38.312 --> 00:53:41.394
<v Joanne Lockwood>worse. That's a real challenge. When we're looking at

00:53:41.512 --> 00:53:44.954
<v Joanne Lockwood>unbiased or debiased or anonymized

00:53:45.022 --> 00:53:48.550
<v Joanne Lockwood>recruitment processes, the ratio is likely to

00:53:48.700 --> 00:53:51.814
<v Joanne Lockwood>not change much. Exactly. And the question of

00:53:51.852 --> 00:53:52.870
<v Sara Dalsfelt>representation,

00:53:55.450 --> 00:53:58.970
<v Sara Dalsfelt>because the outcome is not status quo, right. Our

00:53:59.040 --> 00:54:02.826
<v Sara Dalsfelt>starting point is not equal. Our starting point was

00:54:02.848 --> 00:54:06.470
<v Sara Dalsfelt>never 50 50 male female gender

00:54:06.550 --> 00:54:09.834
<v Sara Dalsfelt>equality. Right? So we have to work

00:54:10.032 --> 00:54:13.818
<v Sara Dalsfelt>from a starting point where I don't know the figure, but if it's

00:54:13.834 --> 00:54:17.582
<v Sara Dalsfelt>70% men in organisation and 30% women, that's our starting

00:54:17.636 --> 00:54:21.294
<v Sara Dalsfelt>point. So then we have to have representation, and I

00:54:21.332 --> 00:54:24.962
<v Sara Dalsfelt>believe boxing women and men

00:54:25.016 --> 00:54:28.100
<v Sara Dalsfelt>in or grouping or all this

00:54:28.710 --> 00:54:32.434
<v Sara Dalsfelt>stuff could be hurtful in the long run. But as

00:54:32.472 --> 00:54:35.934
<v Sara Dalsfelt>a starting point, we have to have an active

00:54:35.982 --> 00:54:39.542
<v Sara Dalsfelt>strategy in terms of making the foundation where we are

00:54:39.596 --> 00:54:43.094
<v Sara Dalsfelt>equal. So naturally we have to approach the fact that,

00:54:43.132 --> 00:54:46.562
<v Sara Dalsfelt>yes, there's going to be a lack of diversity or gender diversity

00:54:46.626 --> 00:54:50.314
<v Sara Dalsfelt>or all parts here, and that needs to be taken

00:54:50.352 --> 00:54:53.962
<v Sara Dalsfelt>into acknowledgment when you build the process and how you assess and how you

00:54:54.016 --> 00:54:57.306
<v Sara Dalsfelt>again, make sure you have the most diverse teams in your

00:54:57.328 --> 00:55:00.746
<v Sara Dalsfelt>company. But there's also a danger

00:55:00.858 --> 00:55:03.440
<v Sara Dalsfelt>in labelling right.

00:55:04.690 --> 00:55:08.430
<v Sara Dalsfelt>In hiring as well, in the long run. But it's a very interesting

00:55:08.500 --> 00:55:12.254
<v Sara Dalsfelt>question and it's an important question. And I think as to

00:55:12.292 --> 00:55:15.874
<v Sara Dalsfelt>point, the starting point was never equal to

00:55:15.912 --> 00:55:19.682
<v Sara Dalsfelt>begin with and that needs to be taken into consideration when you build

00:55:19.736 --> 00:55:23.490
<v Sara Dalsfelt>your strategy. I think you said it earlier, you don't just

00:55:23.560 --> 00:55:26.660
<v Joanne Lockwood>do one thing, you got to fix your

00:55:27.350 --> 00:55:30.614
<v Joanne Lockwood>you got to sweep the floor, clean the room, get your company the

00:55:30.652 --> 00:55:34.486
<v Joanne Lockwood>toxicity, the culture right. First, then you can do what you're talking

00:55:34.508 --> 00:55:38.298
<v Joanne Lockwood>about here is the behavioural outreach via social media. Then if you got

00:55:38.304 --> 00:55:41.690
<v Joanne Lockwood>a specific need around changing the ratio

00:55:42.110 --> 00:55:45.786
<v Joanne Lockwood>of the demographic in your organisation, that's a

00:55:45.808 --> 00:55:49.142
<v Joanne Lockwood>different targeted approach. Yes. You can use different recruitment, marketing,

00:55:49.206 --> 00:55:52.906
<v Joanne Lockwood>different outreach solutions exactly. To

00:55:52.928 --> 00:55:56.686
<v Joanne Lockwood>try and resolve gender or an ethnicity problem. Yeah. Messaging as well. Messaging as

00:55:56.708 --> 00:56:00.480
<v Sara Dalsfelt>well. So, again, what I'm usually getting questions because

00:56:01.170 --> 00:56:04.320
<v Sara Dalsfelt>we do volumes of job campaigns on

00:56:05.250 --> 00:56:08.946
<v Sara Dalsfelt>millions of campaigns on social media platforms. And we're not saying you have

00:56:08.968 --> 00:56:12.658
<v Sara Dalsfelt>to dance and be a TikTok company where you have to have a

00:56:12.664 --> 00:56:16.470
<v Sara Dalsfelt>super polished EVP employer branding. We're saying what people want

00:56:16.540 --> 00:56:20.214
<v Sara Dalsfelt>is your authentic own personnel, explaining to

00:56:20.252 --> 00:56:23.814
<v Sara Dalsfelt>them why they get supported to be their authentic self at

00:56:23.852 --> 00:56:27.366
<v Sara Dalsfelt>work. This is what the candidate market want. They on

00:56:27.388 --> 00:56:31.146
<v Sara Dalsfelt>TikTok, do not want you can dance saying it if you want to, but

00:56:31.168 --> 00:56:34.490
<v Sara Dalsfelt>it's not expected. We want authentic

00:56:34.830 --> 00:56:38.586
<v Sara Dalsfelt>human connections. And just as with the shopping experience,

00:56:38.688 --> 00:56:42.538
<v Sara Dalsfelt>you want real reviews. Right, Joanne? You're looking at the reviews for

00:56:42.544 --> 00:56:45.998
<v Sara Dalsfelt>the air fryer. You want to make sure it's a verified buyer. You want to

00:56:46.004 --> 00:56:49.374
<v Sara Dalsfelt>make sure it's a verified person. It's not getting paid to do the review. Same

00:56:49.412 --> 00:56:53.086
<v Sara Dalsfelt>goes for canned experience. You want to make sure yep. Okay. Hassan has

00:56:53.108 --> 00:56:56.926
<v Sara Dalsfelt>worked in this company for four years. He's the head of engineer. He's been thriving

00:56:56.958 --> 00:57:00.626
<v Sara Dalsfelt>in the company. This is why he stays. That's what you want to know.

00:57:00.728 --> 00:57:04.514
<v Sara Dalsfelt>So, again, it comes down to authentic messaging, but the

00:57:04.552 --> 00:57:07.746
<v Sara Dalsfelt>strategy needs to open up to attract

00:57:07.858 --> 00:57:11.686
<v Sara Dalsfelt>diverse potential. And that comes down to a lot

00:57:11.708 --> 00:57:15.526
<v Sara Dalsfelt>of these factors. It's in the messaging, it's in distribution, it's in

00:57:15.548 --> 00:57:19.226
<v Sara Dalsfelt>the AI powered solution, it's in targeting, but it definitely

00:57:19.328 --> 00:57:22.586
<v Sara Dalsfelt>must be supported by authentic content. No one

00:57:22.768 --> 00:57:25.738
<v Sara Dalsfelt>cares about donuts or whatever people

00:57:25.904 --> 00:57:29.722
<v Sara Dalsfelt>goes for benefits of work. I actually

00:57:29.776 --> 00:57:33.614
<v Sara Dalsfelt>do well. I thrive with I'm having a puppy and I

00:57:33.652 --> 00:57:37.242
<v Sara Dalsfelt>get a lot of budgets approved and we get a lot of new hires

00:57:37.306 --> 00:57:40.798
<v Sara Dalsfelt>because puppy at the office is really popular. But

00:57:40.964 --> 00:57:44.706
<v Sara Dalsfelt>that's just me. And I did not buy the puppy to get more hires. But

00:57:44.808 --> 00:57:48.514
<v Sara Dalsfelt>it was a big plus. We've got to use different

00:57:48.552 --> 00:57:52.386
<v Joanne Lockwood>sorts of marketing and puppies turn people on, cats turn people

00:57:52.408 --> 00:57:55.942
<v Joanne Lockwood>on, children turn people on. Skiing. There's different ways of just

00:57:55.996 --> 00:57:59.318
<v Joanne Lockwood>attracting people and say, oh, this company just get a

00:57:59.404 --> 00:58:02.280
<v Joanne Lockwood>belongingness. Creating the belongingness, isn't it? Exactly.

00:58:03.530 --> 00:58:07.046
<v Joanne Lockwood>Sara, we could talk all day. We will again

00:58:07.228 --> 00:58:10.706
<v Joanne Lockwood>notice in future, I'm sure we'll do another podcast. We'll do a live stream sometime

00:58:10.738 --> 00:58:14.474
<v Joanne Lockwood>soon. But in the meantime, how can people get hold of you?

00:58:14.672 --> 00:58:18.106
<v Joanne Lockwood>You said you had a white paper or some research you can put in the

00:58:18.128 --> 00:58:21.306
<v Joanne Lockwood>show notes. I'll put this in the show notes, absolutely. First of all, I will

00:58:21.328 --> 00:58:25.038
<v Sara Dalsfelt>definitely link to Wolfgang Brickwedde's latest recruiting trends report because I

00:58:25.044 --> 00:58:28.794
<v Sara Dalsfelt>believe everyone needs benchmark data. We also have our latest

00:58:28.842 --> 00:58:32.654
<v Sara Dalsfelt>social recruiting trends analysis, which is really jam packed with

00:58:32.692 --> 00:58:36.466
<v Sara Dalsfelt>how social media can help with inclusive hiring. And if they

00:58:36.488 --> 00:58:40.066
<v Sara Dalsfelt>want to know more about adway, how we work and myself, it's just type in

00:58:40.088 --> 00:58:43.762
<v Sara Dalsfelt>Adway AI and cheque out our talent attraction suite. And

00:58:43.816 --> 00:58:47.378
<v Sara Dalsfelt>I am well addicted to LinkedIn, so I have my community

00:58:47.464 --> 00:58:50.694
<v Sara Dalsfelt>there, I have a lot of engaged followers and I do a lot of live

00:58:50.732 --> 00:58:54.246
<v Sara Dalsfelt>streams and discussions on there. So just type in Sara Dalsfeld on

00:58:54.268 --> 00:58:57.862
<v Sara Dalsfelt>LinkedIn if you want to connect. And I'm happy to keep these

00:58:57.916 --> 00:59:01.354
<v Sara Dalsfelt>discussions going. And that's what we do all the time, Joanne. That's where

00:59:01.392 --> 00:59:04.506
<v Sara Dalsfelt>you thrive in the community and keep

00:59:04.688 --> 00:59:08.486
<v Sara Dalsfelt>educating and challenging old ways of hiring, which I love. You're

00:59:08.518 --> 00:59:12.266
<v Sara Dalsfelt>one of my favourites in the newsfeed. Thank you. I've got

00:59:12.288 --> 00:59:15.742
<v Joanne Lockwood>all blushing again. Thank you. Thank you so much. And

00:59:15.876 --> 00:59:19.406
<v Joanne Lockwood>thank you to you, the listener, for getting to the end staying this far. So

00:59:19.428 --> 00:59:22.910
<v Joanne Lockwood>I really appreciate your engagement. And if you've not already

00:59:22.980 --> 00:59:26.786
<v Joanne Lockwood>subscribed, please do subscribe and cheque out the back issues and the

00:59:26.808 --> 00:59:30.594
<v Joanne Lockwood>back episodes as well. This is the inclusion bites podcast. That's B-I-T-E-S.

00:59:30.632 --> 00:59:34.274
<v Joanne Lockwood>Share the love. Share it with your colleagues, your friends

00:59:34.392 --> 00:59:38.226
<v Joanne Lockwood>and other people on LinkedIn. Of course, I've got other guests lined up

00:59:38.248 --> 00:59:40.966
<v Joanne Lockwood>and I'm sure you'll be inspired by them over the next few weeks and months.

00:59:41.068 --> 00:59:43.718
<v Joanne Lockwood>And, of course, if you'd like to be a guest as well, drop me a

00:59:43.724 --> 00:59:47.394
<v Joanne Lockwood>line together with any feedback, suggestions on how we can improve.

00:59:47.442 --> 00:59:49.382
<v Joanne Lockwood>That'd be fantastic. So, my email address

00:59:49.436 --> 00:59:53.286
<v Joanne Lockwood>jo.lockwood@seechangehappen.co.uk And

00:59:53.308 --> 00:59:56.822
<v Joanne Lockwood>finally, my name is Joanne Lockwood. It has been an

00:59:56.876 --> 01:00:00.494
<v Joanne Lockwood>absolute pleasure to host this podcast for you today. Catch you next

01:00:00.532 --> 01:00:02.810
<v Joanne Lockwood>time. Bye.
