WEBVTT

00:00:00.730 --> 00:00:04.554
<v Joanne Lockwood>Hello, everyone. My name is Joanne Lockwood and I'm your host for the Inclusion

00:00:04.602 --> 00:00:08.126
<v Joanne Lockwood>Bites podcast. In this series, I have interviewed a number of amazing

00:00:08.228 --> 00:00:11.754
<v Joanne Lockwood>people and simply had a conversation around the subject of inclusion,

00:00:11.882 --> 00:00:15.674
<v Joanne Lockwood>belonging and generally making the world a better place for everyone to thrive.

00:00:15.722 --> 00:00:17.838
<v Joanne Lockwood>If you'd like to join me in the future, then please do drop me a

00:00:17.844 --> 00:00:18.574
<v Joanne Lockwood>line to

00:00:18.612 --> 00:00:22.202
<v Joanne Lockwood>jo.Lockwood@seechangehappen.co.uk.

00:00:22.266 --> 00:00:26.006
<v Joanne Lockwood>That's S-E-E Change Happen dot Co dot Uk. You can

00:00:26.028 --> 00:00:29.766
<v Joanne Lockwood>catch up with all of the previous shows on iTunes, Spotify and the usual

00:00:29.788 --> 00:00:33.494
<v Joanne Lockwood>places. So plug in your headphones, grab a decaf and let's

00:00:33.532 --> 00:00:37.158
<v Joanne Lockwood>get going. Today is episode 99

00:00:37.244 --> 00:00:40.954
<v Joanne Lockwood>with the title laughter as a lens, and I have the

00:00:40.992 --> 00:00:44.634
<v Joanne Lockwood>absolute honour and privilege to welcome Beth Sherman. Now, Beth is a

00:00:44.672 --> 00:00:48.486
<v Joanne Lockwood>multi Emmy award winning comedy writer and speaker

00:00:48.598 --> 00:00:52.406
<v Joanne Lockwood>on the power of humour for human connection. When I asked Beth

00:00:52.438 --> 00:00:56.174
<v Joanne Lockwood>to describe her superpower, she said, she can make you funny even

00:00:56.212 --> 00:00:59.774
<v Joanne Lockwood>if you don't think you are. Hello, Beth. Welcome to the show. Hi,

00:00:59.812 --> 00:01:03.230
<v Beth Sherman>Jo. Thanks for having me. I should actually say, welcome back to the show.

00:01:03.380 --> 00:01:07.182
<v Joanne Lockwood>You have the honour of being my first repeat guest

00:01:07.246 --> 00:01:10.946
<v Joanne Lockwood>because we had such terrible Internet troubles last time that

00:01:10.968 --> 00:01:14.686
<v Joanne Lockwood>we had to basically write the entire soundtrack off. It just wasn't

00:01:14.718 --> 00:01:18.498
<v Joanne Lockwood>usable, was it? No. And it was all the fault of my Internet.

00:01:18.674 --> 00:01:22.482
<v Beth Sherman>We disconnected from Zoom. My spotty Internet

00:01:22.546 --> 00:01:25.926
<v Beth Sherman>disconnected from Zoom seven times. I had just moved and the

00:01:25.948 --> 00:01:29.786
<v Beth Sherman>Internet was not properly set up. So BT had given me sort

00:01:29.808 --> 00:01:32.940
<v Beth Sherman>of an interim device that did not work

00:01:33.310 --> 00:01:37.034
<v Beth Sherman>as so. But you know what, in show business, they say,

00:01:37.072 --> 00:01:40.826
<v Beth Sherman>bad dress rehearsal, great show, great show. It was

00:01:40.848 --> 00:01:44.586
<v Beth Sherman>a terrible dress rehearsal. But in the

00:01:44.608 --> 00:01:48.266
<v Joanne Lockwood>spirit of this conversation, laugh was a lens.

00:01:48.378 --> 00:01:52.174
<v Joanne Lockwood>We did have quite a laugh, despite the problems. And it was like

00:01:52.212 --> 00:01:55.746
<v Joanne Lockwood>a real outtakes blooper reel, wasn't it? At times, it really is,

00:01:55.768 --> 00:01:59.522
<v Beth Sherman>but that's what humour does. It is quick

00:01:59.576 --> 00:02:03.314
<v Beth Sherman>connection and being able to laugh at yourself, being able to laugh at the

00:02:03.352 --> 00:02:06.806
<v Beth Sherman>situation. Yeah, I guess we both could have just gotten angrier and

00:02:06.828 --> 00:02:10.374
<v Beth Sherman>angrier. I mean, there was part of it,

00:02:10.412 --> 00:02:14.246
<v Beth Sherman>but at a certain point you just have to look at each

00:02:14.268 --> 00:02:17.894
<v Beth Sherman>other and roll your eyes and laugh. I mean, it was

00:02:17.932 --> 00:02:21.574
<v Beth Sherman>absurd. The first time it was uncomfortable. The second time, it was awkward.

00:02:21.622 --> 00:02:23.850
<v Beth Sherman>The third time it's just silly.

00:02:25.470 --> 00:02:29.270
<v Beth Sherman>But that is connection. I mean, are you going to forget that taping?

00:02:29.350 --> 00:02:31.100
<v Beth Sherman>I know I'm not. I'll try.

00:02:33.150 --> 00:02:36.798
<v Joanne Lockwood>Maybe we will publish a bloopers reel at some point, but it was a

00:02:36.804 --> 00:02:40.446
<v Joanne Lockwood>cross between going through a tunnel on a mobile phone

00:02:40.628 --> 00:02:43.834
<v Joanne Lockwood>and an episode of Doctor who with the Daleks trying to exterminate

00:02:43.882 --> 00:02:47.614
<v Joanne Lockwood>somebody. It was a really broken up conversation. Every

00:02:47.652 --> 00:02:50.066
<v Joanne Lockwood>so often you'd freeze. And I was thinking, are you going to come back or

00:02:50.088 --> 00:02:53.794
<v Joanne Lockwood>aren't you going to come back? And it's comedy genius. Well,

00:02:53.912 --> 00:02:57.682
<v Beth Sherman>and it became a talking point for us. It became

00:02:57.826 --> 00:03:01.366
<v Beth Sherman>a way to. Well, it's become a

00:03:01.388 --> 00:03:04.966
<v Beth Sherman>reference for us. I mean, I'm sure when we run into each

00:03:04.988 --> 00:03:08.726
<v Beth Sherman>other again, it will come up. It becomes a shared

00:03:08.758 --> 00:03:12.454
<v Beth Sherman>experience, so why not turn a negative

00:03:12.502 --> 00:03:15.878
<v Beth Sherman>into a positive? Yeah. So you're an Emmy

00:03:15.974 --> 00:03:19.462
<v Joanne Lockwood>award winning writer. Tell us a bit about your background

00:03:19.526 --> 00:03:23.214
<v Joanne Lockwood>and how you got here today to. The

00:03:23.252 --> 00:03:26.954
<v Beth Sherman>second bedroom where we're recording this. Where I'm recording this. We're not in a bedroom

00:03:27.002 --> 00:03:30.430
<v Beth Sherman>together. Well,

00:03:30.580 --> 00:03:34.314
<v Beth Sherman>I am a comedy writer by trade. I fell

00:03:34.362 --> 00:03:37.794
<v Beth Sherman>in love with the idea of writing comedy for

00:03:37.832 --> 00:03:41.314
<v Beth Sherman>television from the time I realised it was a job.

00:03:41.432 --> 00:03:45.220
<v Beth Sherman>And I can actually remember that because I was about 15, I watched a

00:03:45.990 --> 00:03:49.446
<v Beth Sherman>behind the scenes news programme on a

00:03:49.468 --> 00:03:53.254
<v Beth Sherman>sitcom that I loved, and they weren't focusing on the

00:03:53.292 --> 00:03:56.834
<v Beth Sherman>cast behind the scenes. They showed us a magical place called the writers

00:03:56.882 --> 00:04:00.466
<v Beth Sherman>room. And it was just ten guys sitting around a

00:04:00.508 --> 00:04:04.218
<v Beth Sherman>conference table being funny. And they got paid for it and it

00:04:04.224 --> 00:04:08.026
<v Beth Sherman>was a job and it was guys, mostly guys at

00:04:08.048 --> 00:04:11.420
<v Beth Sherman>the time. But as soon as I realised that was a job,

00:04:11.790 --> 00:04:15.454
<v Beth Sherman>it's the only thing I ever wanted to do. And I'd been obsessed with stand

00:04:15.492 --> 00:04:18.862
<v Beth Sherman>up, so I just always had an ear for comedy. I went to

00:04:18.916 --> 00:04:22.110
<v Beth Sherman>university, I moved to Los Angeles.

00:04:22.610 --> 00:04:26.322
<v Beth Sherman>I'm born and raised in Philadelphia, nowhere near show business, nowhere anything like that.

00:04:26.376 --> 00:04:30.018
<v Beth Sherman>I moved to Los Angeles after college to go follow

00:04:30.104 --> 00:04:33.854
<v Beth Sherman>my dreams. I didn't know anyone except a woman that I'd

00:04:33.902 --> 00:04:37.670
<v Beth Sherman>gone to college with. And I started at the bottom, getting

00:04:37.740 --> 00:04:41.526
<v Beth Sherman>coffee, making copies. I started as a production assistant, worked my way

00:04:41.548 --> 00:04:45.030
<v Beth Sherman>up to writer's assistant, and then eventually started getting

00:04:45.100 --> 00:04:48.934
<v Beth Sherman>paid writing jobs on tv shows.

00:04:49.052 --> 00:04:52.726
<v Beth Sherman>And I found my tribe. It was my place and I absolutely loved

00:04:52.758 --> 00:04:56.566
<v Beth Sherman>it. I did that for. Well, I'm still doing that. That's

00:04:56.598 --> 00:05:00.266
<v Beth Sherman>27 years. And along the way, I didn't have the

00:05:00.288 --> 00:05:02.938
<v Beth Sherman>courage to do stand up myself, even though I was in love with it. I

00:05:02.944 --> 00:05:06.094
<v Beth Sherman>didn't really find the courage to do that until I'd had a few

00:05:06.292 --> 00:05:09.994
<v Beth Sherman>professional comedy writing jobs under my belt. And I also found myself writing

00:05:10.042 --> 00:05:13.754
<v Beth Sherman>for a lot of comedians who pushed me to try stand up myself. So within

00:05:13.812 --> 00:05:17.442
<v Beth Sherman>that career, I also did 15 years of stand up and about

00:05:17.496 --> 00:05:21.022
<v Beth Sherman>six or seven years ago, because the nature of tv

00:05:21.086 --> 00:05:24.894
<v Beth Sherman>work is it's freelance. So sometimes the jobs

00:05:24.942 --> 00:05:28.118
<v Beth Sherman>last three years or five years and sometimes they're ten weeks and quite a bit

00:05:28.124 --> 00:05:31.654
<v Beth Sherman>of them were ten weeks. And to fill some of that

00:05:31.692 --> 00:05:35.330
<v Beth Sherman>period in between, I started writing for doing speech writing

00:05:35.410 --> 00:05:39.174
<v Beth Sherman>for non entertainment professionals. So helping people

00:05:39.212 --> 00:05:42.762
<v Beth Sherman>who were doing TED talks or delivering sea level

00:05:42.816 --> 00:05:46.266
<v Beth Sherman>executives, delivering speeches, helping them make their speeches funnier and more

00:05:46.288 --> 00:05:49.846
<v Beth Sherman>engaging. A lot of very smart people delivering Ted talks,

00:05:49.878 --> 00:05:53.678
<v Beth Sherman>helping them not sound like a robot, but

00:05:53.764 --> 00:05:57.358
<v Beth Sherman>finding a way to be authentically funny, because there's nothing

00:05:57.444 --> 00:06:01.022
<v Beth Sherman>worse than listening to someone shoehorn in a joke that

00:06:01.076 --> 00:06:04.078
<v Beth Sherman>clearly has nothing to do with them or their personality.

00:06:04.254 --> 00:06:07.922
<v Beth Sherman>So I also fell in love with that

00:06:07.976 --> 00:06:11.394
<v Beth Sherman>side of it. I just love bringing humour into the world

00:06:11.512 --> 00:06:15.294
<v Beth Sherman>and working one to one with a lot of these speech

00:06:15.342 --> 00:06:19.014
<v Beth Sherman>writing clients made me realise that a lot of the things

00:06:19.052 --> 00:06:22.726
<v Beth Sherman>I do instinctively and my friends and colleagues do instinctively does

00:06:22.748 --> 00:06:25.800
<v Beth Sherman>not come instinctively to other people.

00:06:26.410 --> 00:06:30.246
<v Beth Sherman>I've been working as a professional comedy writer since I'm in that world since

00:06:30.268 --> 00:06:33.914
<v Beth Sherman>I was 20 years old. So I just assume everyone thinks that

00:06:33.952 --> 00:06:37.626
<v Beth Sherman>way, but they don't. And as I was explaining over and over

00:06:37.648 --> 00:06:41.386
<v Beth Sherman>again to one to one clients, or pointing out these comedic opportunities in the

00:06:41.408 --> 00:06:44.846
<v Beth Sherman>material they'd written, and again, not trying to make them into stand up

00:06:44.868 --> 00:06:48.590
<v Beth Sherman>comedians, just trying to make that quarterly report or the TED talk,

00:06:48.660 --> 00:06:52.014
<v Beth Sherman>just give it a little bit of humour, a little bit of balance to some

00:06:52.052 --> 00:06:55.714
<v Beth Sherman>serious subjects. I realised that I had something to teach and to share.

00:06:55.832 --> 00:06:59.662
<v Beth Sherman>And so I've now started speaking on the subject

00:06:59.726 --> 00:07:02.850
<v Beth Sherman>and talking about humour as a tool for quick connection.

00:07:03.990 --> 00:07:07.606
<v Joanne Lockwood>There's a massive fear of public speaking, let

00:07:07.628 --> 00:07:10.402
<v Joanne Lockwood>alone professional speaking. It's even got its own term,

00:07:10.466 --> 00:07:14.102
<v Joanne Lockwood>glossophobia, fear of public speaking. And it's one of the

00:07:14.156 --> 00:07:17.958
<v Joanne Lockwood>biggest kind of anxieties that most human beings can face in

00:07:17.964 --> 00:07:21.626
<v Joanne Lockwood>their life, actually having to stand up on stage or stand up in public, or

00:07:21.648 --> 00:07:25.100
<v Joanne Lockwood>even stand in front of a room of your team and speak.

00:07:25.630 --> 00:07:29.450
<v Joanne Lockwood>It must be doubly difficult, if you have that anxiety about speaking

00:07:29.520 --> 00:07:33.166
<v Joanne Lockwood>anyway, to add some of yourself, some of your

00:07:33.188 --> 00:07:36.830
<v Joanne Lockwood>humour in there, because you're so focusing on the content

00:07:36.900 --> 00:07:40.686
<v Joanne Lockwood>or what you've got to try and say, or being professional or creating a

00:07:40.708 --> 00:07:44.326
<v Joanne Lockwood>great impression that you can't relax

00:07:44.378 --> 00:07:48.002
<v Joanne Lockwood>into it. So how do you help people overcome that fear of public

00:07:48.056 --> 00:07:51.614
<v Joanne Lockwood>speaking and therefore embrace their comedic

00:07:51.662 --> 00:07:55.506
<v Joanne Lockwood>self or humorous self? Well, there's that great Seinfeld joke about the fear of

00:07:55.528 --> 00:07:59.026
<v Beth Sherman>public speaking, where that it's one of the biggest

00:07:59.058 --> 00:08:02.854
<v Beth Sherman>fears, which means that at a funeral, most people would

00:08:02.892 --> 00:08:06.550
<v Beth Sherman>rather be the person in the coffin rather than the one delivering the eulogy.

00:08:08.830 --> 00:08:12.458
<v Beth Sherman>But to me, what

00:08:12.624 --> 00:08:16.442
<v Beth Sherman>takes away some of that fear of public speaking, one,

00:08:16.496 --> 00:08:20.038
<v Beth Sherman>like the fear of doing anything, is preparation. So

00:08:20.144 --> 00:08:23.546
<v Beth Sherman>knowing that you have good material to deliver helps.

00:08:23.738 --> 00:08:27.326
<v Beth Sherman>And when I work one to one with people who.

00:08:27.428 --> 00:08:31.214
<v Beth Sherman>Well, and also, again, adding humour to

00:08:31.252 --> 00:08:34.654
<v Beth Sherman>something isn't just about trying to make someone a stand up

00:08:34.692 --> 00:08:37.858
<v Beth Sherman>comedian. So if someone is getting up to give a best man speech or a

00:08:37.864 --> 00:08:41.634
<v Beth Sherman>father of the bride speech, I work with a lot of clients doing those. A

00:08:41.672 --> 00:08:45.042
<v Beth Sherman>great way to add humour is just to be

00:08:45.096 --> 00:08:48.934
<v Beth Sherman>yourself and add authenticity. So if I've got someone

00:08:48.972 --> 00:08:52.694
<v Beth Sherman>who's terrified and they're giving a speech where it's going

00:08:52.732 --> 00:08:56.546
<v Beth Sherman>to be so distracting to them and to the audience, where their nerves

00:08:56.578 --> 00:08:59.594
<v Beth Sherman>will be a massive distraction, not just to them, but to the audience, people will

00:08:59.632 --> 00:09:03.354
<v Beth Sherman>really see them and see how nervous they are, you have to

00:09:03.392 --> 00:09:07.162
<v Beth Sherman>acknowledge it. So give them a joke. I mean,

00:09:07.216 --> 00:09:10.986
<v Beth Sherman>give them something that sounds like. I have

00:09:11.008 --> 00:09:14.606
<v Beth Sherman>to be honest, I'm not comfortable speaking in public. It's not my

00:09:14.628 --> 00:09:18.362
<v Beth Sherman>favourite thing to do. So if I pass out from nerves,

00:09:18.506 --> 00:09:21.886
<v Beth Sherman>just drag me back to my seat when I come to tell me I was

00:09:21.908 --> 00:09:25.394
<v Beth Sherman>great. And it's the kind of thing, it's just

00:09:25.432 --> 00:09:29.166
<v Beth Sherman>acknowledge. It's a dialogue.

00:09:29.198 --> 00:09:31.678
<v Beth Sherman>When you're up on a stage in front of people, whatever it is that you're

00:09:31.694 --> 00:09:35.202
<v Beth Sherman>doing, it's a dialogue. So let the other

00:09:35.256 --> 00:09:38.466
<v Beth Sherman>half of. Let the other party in the conversation

00:09:38.658 --> 00:09:42.338
<v Beth Sherman>know how you're feeling. And if you're nervous, you don't

00:09:42.354 --> 00:09:45.974
<v Beth Sherman>always have to acknowledge it. Sometimes it's just kind of that little

00:09:46.012 --> 00:09:49.834
<v Beth Sherman>adrenaline rush. But if it's the elephant in the room and it's something that's going

00:09:49.872 --> 00:09:53.706
<v Beth Sherman>to be a distraction to yourself so that you can't get the

00:09:53.728 --> 00:09:57.558
<v Beth Sherman>words out or to your audience, you don't

00:09:57.574 --> 00:10:01.246
<v Beth Sherman>want them sitting there thinking, oh, that poor guy.

00:10:01.348 --> 00:10:05.054
<v Beth Sherman>Oh, this is awkward. Oh, this is uncomfortable. If they

00:10:05.092 --> 00:10:08.906
<v Beth Sherman>know the stakes, if they know how you feel and they know the stakes,

00:10:08.938 --> 00:10:12.558
<v Beth Sherman>or if your opportunity

00:10:12.644 --> 00:10:16.002
<v Beth Sherman>to speak, if you

00:10:16.056 --> 00:10:19.774
<v Beth Sherman>acknowledge, I couldn't turn down this opportunity and they know you're nervous,

00:10:19.822 --> 00:10:23.486
<v Beth Sherman>they're going to root for you, they want you to succeed.

00:10:23.598 --> 00:10:27.346
<v Beth Sherman>If they know what you're up against, if they know you have a paralysing fear

00:10:27.378 --> 00:10:30.934
<v Beth Sherman>of public speaking and you're up there and you're doing it anyway, let them know

00:10:30.972 --> 00:10:34.726
<v Beth Sherman>that, because now, well, one, you've made

00:10:34.748 --> 00:10:38.422
<v Beth Sherman>yourself a little bit vulnerable, but you've connected with them,

00:10:38.476 --> 00:10:41.622
<v Beth Sherman>and if you can do that, with a little bit of a sense of humour,

00:10:41.766 --> 00:10:44.954
<v Beth Sherman>more the better. But now you've got people that are on your

00:10:44.992 --> 00:10:48.550
<v Beth Sherman>side. I remember delivering the speech

00:10:48.630 --> 00:10:52.282
<v Joanne Lockwood>at our daughter's wedding a couple of years ago and it was like

00:10:52.336 --> 00:10:56.046
<v Joanne Lockwood>I was given 15 minutes and it was the toughest audience I think

00:10:56.068 --> 00:10:59.898
<v Joanne Lockwood>I've ever had because I wasn't speaking around what a professional speaker

00:10:59.914 --> 00:11:03.754
<v Joanne Lockwood>myself. So I wasn't speaking about my day job, I wasn't thinking about my comfort

00:11:03.802 --> 00:11:07.460
<v Joanne Lockwood>zone, the things that I speak about all the time. I was trying to be

00:11:07.910 --> 00:11:11.634
<v Joanne Lockwood>entertaining for a guest list. I only

00:11:11.672 --> 00:11:15.506
<v Joanne Lockwood>knew probably a third of them. I was under strict instructions. My

00:11:15.528 --> 00:11:19.190
<v Joanne Lockwood>daughter's husband actually took me to one side and said, you must not

00:11:19.260 --> 00:11:22.582
<v Joanne Lockwood>make it. These embarrassing statements. You must not show my

00:11:22.636 --> 00:11:26.438
<v Joanne Lockwood>husband. I was giving this kind of like, up talk to me and

00:11:26.444 --> 00:11:30.006
<v Joanne Lockwood>saying, give me a brief on how I had to behave. And I thought. And

00:11:30.028 --> 00:11:33.594
<v Joanne Lockwood>it was trying to put some humour in there because you can't make that stuff.

00:11:33.632 --> 00:11:37.180
<v Joanne Lockwood>It's got to be light hearted. So I told some anecdotes around. My daughter's life

00:11:37.630 --> 00:11:41.238
<v Joanne Lockwood>just sailed close to the wind where I knew the red line was I didn't

00:11:41.254 --> 00:11:45.066
<v Joanne Lockwood>cross it. I just took people there and I led them down the path

00:11:45.098 --> 00:11:48.542
<v Joanne Lockwood>without telling them the punchline. And you can guess what happened next. And

00:11:48.596 --> 00:11:51.982
<v Joanne Lockwood>so she then had to explain it to all her friends what happened

00:11:52.036 --> 00:11:55.818
<v Joanne Lockwood>next. So I let her do the telling. But I remember telling

00:11:55.834 --> 00:11:59.186
<v Joanne Lockwood>this gag at the end and I won't tell it now, but I tell this

00:11:59.208 --> 00:12:02.894
<v Joanne Lockwood>gag at the end that even now, people who are at the wedding

00:12:02.942 --> 00:12:06.230
<v Joanne Lockwood>still remember that gag because it was so relevant.

00:12:06.650 --> 00:12:10.454
<v Joanne Lockwood>It was a play on their name and their surname and, yeah,

00:12:10.492 --> 00:12:13.560
<v Joanne Lockwood>they still remember it now. And everyone's going, wow, that's fantastic. And

00:12:15.370 --> 00:12:18.646
<v Joanne Lockwood>even the mother of the

00:12:18.668 --> 00:12:22.394
<v Joanne Lockwood>bridegroom, my daughter's mother in law, even

00:12:22.432 --> 00:12:25.178
<v Joanne Lockwood>finds it funny, even though it's her name. I was taking the mickey out of

00:12:25.184 --> 00:12:28.774
<v Joanne Lockwood>sort of thing. So you can build it in, provided

00:12:28.822 --> 00:12:32.374
<v Joanne Lockwood>you understand the boundaries of where humour

00:12:32.422 --> 00:12:35.898
<v Joanne Lockwood>stops and embarrassment starts or discrimination

00:12:35.994 --> 00:12:39.358
<v Joanne Lockwood>or bullying or whatever that may be. That's the fine line in comedy, isn't it?

00:12:39.364 --> 00:12:43.118
<v Joanne Lockwood>It's knowing when to punch up, not punch down. Well, of course.

00:12:43.204 --> 00:12:47.006
<v Beth Sherman>I mean, humour is a tool, and like any tool, you can use it to

00:12:47.028 --> 00:12:50.066
<v Beth Sherman>build something. You can use a hammer to build something, or you could use it

00:12:50.088 --> 00:12:53.666
<v Beth Sherman>for much worse purposes. Good for you for giving a speech, by the way, just

00:12:53.688 --> 00:12:57.250
<v Beth Sherman>as a public service announcement, if you're getting married, don't give anyone

00:12:57.320 --> 00:13:01.106
<v Beth Sherman>15 minutes. It's a lot of time. I mean, you are a professional

00:13:01.138 --> 00:13:04.886
<v Beth Sherman>speaker, so they were in good hands. But 15 minutes is

00:13:04.908 --> 00:13:08.440
<v Beth Sherman>a long time. If you've got just the best man,

00:13:09.630 --> 00:13:13.434
<v Beth Sherman>that's an invitation you might live to regret. 5 minutes. 5

00:13:13.472 --> 00:13:16.970
<v Beth Sherman>minutes is a general, good rule. Yeah, but the difference

00:13:17.120 --> 00:13:20.330
<v Beth Sherman>between knowing where the line is, I mean, in a personal

00:13:20.400 --> 00:13:23.870
<v Beth Sherman>speech, what I find works very well is if you have anything

00:13:24.020 --> 00:13:27.326
<v Beth Sherman>that you know because you love this person

00:13:27.428 --> 00:13:31.230
<v Beth Sherman>isn't crossing a line, but the person, you think the person might

00:13:31.300 --> 00:13:35.106
<v Beth Sherman>see it as a little bit embarrassing, but you feel in good

00:13:35.128 --> 00:13:38.514
<v Beth Sherman>conscience that it's not awful. You know, your

00:13:38.552 --> 00:13:42.338
<v Beth Sherman>daughter, sometimes you can get away with something like that by sort of sandwiching it

00:13:42.424 --> 00:13:46.162
<v Beth Sherman>within a bunch of. Within compliments. She's this

00:13:46.216 --> 00:13:49.874
<v Beth Sherman>and she's that. She's this wonderful. Has this wonderful quality. That wonderful

00:13:49.922 --> 00:13:53.382
<v Beth Sherman>quality. But sometimes she blank. She does

00:13:53.436 --> 00:13:57.122
<v Beth Sherman>this. So you put it out there in a way where it's

00:13:57.266 --> 00:14:00.486
<v Beth Sherman>clearly affectionate, clearly balanced, and the

00:14:00.588 --> 00:14:04.330
<v Beth Sherman>admiration and the respect that you have for her is abundantly clear.

00:14:04.400 --> 00:14:07.338
<v Beth Sherman>Sometimes that's a way to navigate it. I have a lot of clients where it

00:14:07.344 --> 00:14:11.146
<v Beth Sherman>just sounds like a roast and it becomes un. Would you like to say

00:14:11.168 --> 00:14:14.926
<v Beth Sherman>something nice about this person who is your best friend? Even though we

00:14:14.948 --> 00:14:18.106
<v Beth Sherman>all know that they feel that way in professional

00:14:18.138 --> 00:14:21.786
<v Beth Sherman>speeches, I always recommend playing it safe. If you're

00:14:21.818 --> 00:14:25.442
<v Beth Sherman>not sure, don't say it. There's a leeway that you have with a personal

00:14:25.496 --> 00:14:28.820
<v Beth Sherman>speech that you don't have in a professional situation. But

00:14:31.270 --> 00:14:35.006
<v Beth Sherman>I think when people go wrong, often now, they're trying to be

00:14:35.048 --> 00:14:38.886
<v Beth Sherman>provocative. They are intentionally trying to get a

00:14:38.908 --> 00:14:42.726
<v Beth Sherman>reaction. So I think sometimes that's something to

00:14:42.748 --> 00:14:46.070
<v Beth Sherman>measure it against, personally. I mean, if you're asking about

00:14:46.140 --> 00:14:49.866
<v Beth Sherman>comedians who sometimes cross the line, as

00:14:49.888 --> 00:14:53.674
<v Beth Sherman>a comedian myself, I support the

00:14:53.712 --> 00:14:57.382
<v Beth Sherman>right to do it. To me personally, unless everyone in the room is laughing,

00:14:57.446 --> 00:15:00.906
<v Beth Sherman>it's not funny. To me personally, that raises the

00:15:00.928 --> 00:15:04.554
<v Beth Sherman>bar. And if you have a joke that's on a controversial

00:15:04.602 --> 00:15:08.094
<v Beth Sherman>subject or could possibly be interpreted in a way or

00:15:08.132 --> 00:15:11.920
<v Beth Sherman>misinterpreted, rather in a way that seems as if it's punching down,

00:15:12.930 --> 00:15:16.734
<v Beth Sherman>I think then you need to really show your skill as

00:15:16.772 --> 00:15:20.546
<v Beth Sherman>a writer and a performer to make it clear what your intention is

00:15:20.568 --> 00:15:24.386
<v Beth Sherman>behind the joke. Because there's a world of difference. A friend of mine put

00:15:24.408 --> 00:15:26.614
<v Beth Sherman>it in a way that it was just beautiful. I mean, because there's a world

00:15:26.652 --> 00:15:30.326
<v Beth Sherman>of difference between the subject of the joke and the target of the

00:15:30.348 --> 00:15:33.320
<v Beth Sherman>joke. So the subject of the joke in itself

00:15:34.730 --> 00:15:38.466
<v Beth Sherman>might be controversial, but the target of the joke isn't

00:15:38.498 --> 00:15:41.994
<v Beth Sherman>necessarily it would be possible to have a joke about

00:15:42.192 --> 00:15:45.910
<v Beth Sherman>trans or abortion or something like that, where the target of the joke

00:15:46.070 --> 00:15:49.706
<v Beth Sherman>is. It's a joke that everyone, including the community

00:15:49.808 --> 00:15:53.310
<v Beth Sherman>that is mentioned, could laugh, I would hope.

00:15:53.460 --> 00:15:56.906
<v Joanne Lockwood>Yeah, I've got my own five to ten minute comedy

00:15:56.938 --> 00:15:59.934
<v Joanne Lockwood>routine and it's around trans

00:16:00.132 --> 00:16:03.858
<v Joanne Lockwood>comedy, and I tell jokes and people tell me

00:16:03.864 --> 00:16:07.678
<v Joanne Lockwood>it's funny from all perspectives. So, yeah, it's

00:16:07.694 --> 00:16:11.410
<v Joanne Lockwood>kind of visual comedy. So I'm painting pitch to people's minds with actions and

00:16:11.480 --> 00:16:15.154
<v Joanne Lockwood>taking to that journey. You're right, you

00:16:15.192 --> 00:16:18.578
<v Joanne Lockwood>can use tricky subjects if you have

00:16:18.584 --> 00:16:22.358
<v Joanne Lockwood>some authenticity in that area, so you're not trying to use it against something you

00:16:22.364 --> 00:16:25.718
<v Joanne Lockwood>have no experience of, I think. So you can use yourself as an example of

00:16:25.724 --> 00:16:28.774
<v Joanne Lockwood>the joke. What are you trying to say with the joke? I think it comes

00:16:28.812 --> 00:16:32.518
<v Beth Sherman>down. We've certainly seen a lot of people. What they're

00:16:32.534 --> 00:16:36.330
<v Beth Sherman>trying to say with the joke is, these people are bad, this person is stupid.

00:16:37.070 --> 00:16:40.510
<v Beth Sherman>It's not always a great message, but I think it's definitely possible,

00:16:40.580 --> 00:16:43.760
<v Beth Sherman>because it's definitely possible to write a joke where

00:16:44.930 --> 00:16:48.526
<v Beth Sherman>everyone's laughing. And to me, that's the only reason to do a

00:16:48.548 --> 00:16:51.680
<v Beth Sherman>joke. If everyone's laughing, not just for

00:16:52.370 --> 00:16:55.618
<v Beth Sherman>a moral. As. As a moral reason,

00:16:55.704 --> 00:16:59.300
<v Beth Sherman>but if I'm speaking to a room of 200 people,

00:16:59.990 --> 00:17:03.394
<v Beth Sherman>200 people laughing sounds better than 100 people laughing, or

00:17:03.432 --> 00:17:06.782
<v Beth Sherman>75 people laughing, or four people laughing. If your

00:17:06.856 --> 00:17:10.674
<v Beth Sherman>objective is to make a point or inspire action,

00:17:10.722 --> 00:17:14.230
<v Beth Sherman>or simply just make the room laugh, more people laughing sounds better,

00:17:14.300 --> 00:17:17.786
<v Beth Sherman>feels better to everyone. I suppose we've also got to be

00:17:17.808 --> 00:17:21.610
<v Joanne Lockwood>mindful that humour doesn't always travel borders

00:17:22.270 --> 00:17:25.526
<v Joanne Lockwood>or cultures. So what is funny

00:17:25.718 --> 00:17:29.206
<v Joanne Lockwood>to a UK based english speaking person who's

00:17:29.238 --> 00:17:33.006
<v Joanne Lockwood>been maybe lived here in this country all of their

00:17:33.028 --> 00:17:36.686
<v Joanne Lockwood>lives is different to someone who's come to this country

00:17:36.868 --> 00:17:39.230
<v Joanne Lockwood>in their mid 20s, speaks English,

00:17:40.690 --> 00:17:44.330
<v Joanne Lockwood>you originate from America, so there's some british humour

00:17:44.410 --> 00:17:48.034
<v Joanne Lockwood>that you probably don't understand. You have to be sort of socialised from

00:17:48.072 --> 00:17:51.810
<v Joanne Lockwood>birth, almost, with the humour and the culture. And if you're not careful,

00:17:52.550 --> 00:17:55.634
<v Joanne Lockwood>you can crack a funny or think you're cracking a funny, and the whole room

00:17:55.672 --> 00:17:59.234
<v Joanne Lockwood>just stares back at you. And there's also generational. If I talk about Monty

00:17:59.282 --> 00:18:03.106
<v Joanne Lockwood>Python or some of the things that resonated with me when I was growing

00:18:03.138 --> 00:18:06.306
<v Joanne Lockwood>up in the modern

00:18:06.418 --> 00:18:10.246
<v Joanne Lockwood>person, probably wasn't even alive when friends hit the

00:18:10.268 --> 00:18:13.562
<v Joanne Lockwood>tv screen in the late 90s. Yeah, it's a matter

00:18:13.616 --> 00:18:17.386
<v Beth Sherman>of. And in those cases, if using something like that is

00:18:17.408 --> 00:18:21.034
<v Beth Sherman>an example, sometimes all you have to do is just add a little bit of

00:18:21.072 --> 00:18:24.846
<v Beth Sherman>explanation. If you feel like Monty Python is the

00:18:24.868 --> 00:18:28.410
<v Beth Sherman>best example of whatever it is you're trying to illustrate,

00:18:28.570 --> 00:18:31.978
<v Beth Sherman>just make sure that you say Monty Python. It's a group. They did a bunch

00:18:31.994 --> 00:18:35.326
<v Beth Sherman>of ridiculous stuff. They had movies like this and this. You may know, even if

00:18:35.348 --> 00:18:39.010
<v Beth Sherman>you don't know who they are, you may have heard of this. Just give it

00:18:39.080 --> 00:18:42.834
<v Beth Sherman>an extra little bit of explanation so that everyone in the room can follow

00:18:42.872 --> 00:18:46.578
<v Beth Sherman>you. Make sure everyone has context. I see that happen a lot.

00:18:46.664 --> 00:18:50.486
<v Beth Sherman>Especially for me. Yeah, I didn't grow up here. So there are

00:18:50.508 --> 00:18:54.166
<v Beth Sherman>references, there are words, there are phrases. Even though my partner is

00:18:54.188 --> 00:18:57.834
<v Beth Sherman>English, I've known for 20 years and kind of had 1ft in this culture, very

00:18:57.872 --> 00:19:01.434
<v Beth Sherman>often I have no idea what's being

00:19:01.472 --> 00:19:04.906
<v Beth Sherman>referenced. But again, if you are

00:19:05.088 --> 00:19:08.838
<v Beth Sherman>delivering humour on stage or you're just trying to make a connection

00:19:08.854 --> 00:19:12.266
<v Beth Sherman>with someone, just take an extra 3 seconds and add a little bit of an

00:19:12.288 --> 00:19:16.094
<v Beth Sherman>explanation. And you don't have to start from the very beginning, just

00:19:16.132 --> 00:19:19.806
<v Beth Sherman>enough so that the people who may or may, I know I'm

00:19:19.828 --> 00:19:23.182
<v Beth Sherman>speaking to an international crowd here, I mean, even something like that, give the reason

00:19:23.236 --> 00:19:26.066
<v Beth Sherman>why you're going to give the little bit of explanation and then just give that

00:19:26.088 --> 00:19:29.890
<v Beth Sherman>tiny bit of explanation. And you can use that as an opportunity for humour.

00:19:30.790 --> 00:19:34.626
<v Beth Sherman>You can sort of have an awareness of your age. Oh, Monty Python. I

00:19:34.648 --> 00:19:38.214
<v Beth Sherman>know I'm a thousand years old. So maybe everyone here

00:19:38.252 --> 00:19:41.480
<v Beth Sherman>isn't old enough to remember Monty Python. I mean,

00:19:42.250 --> 00:19:46.070
<v Beth Sherman>you can give it context and you can use. Well, again, turn that

00:19:46.140 --> 00:19:49.946
<v Beth Sherman>potential negative that people might not understand. Use it as a positive, use

00:19:49.968 --> 00:19:53.066
<v Beth Sherman>it as a way to, well, inform and

00:19:53.088 --> 00:19:55.420
<v Beth Sherman>educate. And also

00:19:56.350 --> 00:19:59.622
<v Beth Sherman>add the humour of self awareness. Not self deprecating

00:19:59.686 --> 00:20:03.402
<v Beth Sherman>necessarily, but just the awareness. People will appreciate

00:20:03.466 --> 00:20:07.166
<v Beth Sherman>the awareness that you're not just because that

00:20:07.188 --> 00:20:10.830
<v Beth Sherman>you're not just continuing on and not caring if they understand it or not.

00:20:10.900 --> 00:20:14.478
<v Beth Sherman>Because also, if you're speaking and someone doesn't get something

00:20:14.644 --> 00:20:17.778
<v Beth Sherman>or it's not funny, it's not just that they stare back at you and you

00:20:17.784 --> 00:20:20.450
<v Beth Sherman>don't get the laugh in the moment their minds wander,

00:20:21.990 --> 00:20:25.806
<v Beth Sherman>you start to lose them. And then you're sort of digging yourself into

00:20:25.848 --> 00:20:29.638
<v Beth Sherman>this hole where they're not going

00:20:29.644 --> 00:20:33.222
<v Beth Sherman>to be paying as close attention because it's not really for

00:20:33.276 --> 00:20:36.406
<v Beth Sherman>them or they feel as if you haven't taken them into

00:20:36.428 --> 00:20:40.006
<v Beth Sherman>consideration or just their phone pings, so they take a look at

00:20:40.028 --> 00:20:43.466
<v Beth Sherman>it. And now you've dug yourself into a hole. Now you have to really

00:20:43.568 --> 00:20:47.254
<v Beth Sherman>work even harder to get that attention back, and it's easily

00:20:47.302 --> 00:20:51.082
<v Beth Sherman>avoidable. So the obvious time where humour can work really

00:20:51.136 --> 00:20:54.826
<v Joanne Lockwood>well is when someone's trying to heckle you or join

00:20:54.858 --> 00:20:58.654
<v Joanne Lockwood>in the conversation from the floor. As a speaker on stage, you can

00:20:58.772 --> 00:21:02.526
<v Joanne Lockwood>use comedy or humour as a put down as well, can't you? If you're

00:21:02.548 --> 00:21:06.286
<v Joanne Lockwood>careful, you can. That's always a

00:21:06.308 --> 00:21:08.578
<v Beth Sherman>line that you have to be careful if you're going to cross it, because you

00:21:08.584 --> 00:21:12.274
<v Beth Sherman>can't uncross it. There are times the best advice I

00:21:12.312 --> 00:21:15.518
<v Beth Sherman>got on that a guy who was a legendary

00:21:15.614 --> 00:21:19.126
<v Beth Sherman>comedian saw something happen to me and then said,

00:21:19.228 --> 00:21:23.046
<v Beth Sherman>here's what you do. First you have to vet the heckle, and

00:21:23.068 --> 00:21:26.854
<v Beth Sherman>that means you have to. Again, well,

00:21:26.892 --> 00:21:30.398
<v Beth Sherman>in a comedy club, you don't always have to acknowledge every single heckle.

00:21:30.514 --> 00:21:34.154
<v Beth Sherman>You don't have to acknowledge everything because sometimes it might distract you, but

00:21:34.192 --> 00:21:37.770
<v Beth Sherman>maybe it hasn't distracted the whole room. If someone says something,

00:21:37.920 --> 00:21:41.738
<v Beth Sherman>you have to repeat it back because you've heard it. But maybe the

00:21:41.744 --> 00:21:45.214
<v Beth Sherman>people in the back of the room haven't heard it. And I'm now gesturing towards

00:21:45.252 --> 00:21:47.950
<v Beth Sherman>the back of the room, which is perfect for a podcast,

00:21:49.810 --> 00:21:52.638
<v Beth Sherman>but maybe the people in the back of the room didn't hear it. So all

00:21:52.644 --> 00:21:56.058
<v Beth Sherman>of a sudden you just go off on someone and their friends stop what you're

00:21:56.074 --> 00:21:59.714
<v Beth Sherman>doing and go off on someone, and they're very puzzled, the people who

00:21:59.752 --> 00:22:03.234
<v Beth Sherman>didn't hear it. So you have to repeat it back, because also

00:22:03.352 --> 00:22:06.366
<v Beth Sherman>what has happened? And he told me a great story, I can't remember the phrase,

00:22:06.398 --> 00:22:09.910
<v Beth Sherman>but he told me a great story where he thought someone had heckled him, someone

00:22:09.980 --> 00:22:13.474
<v Beth Sherman>shouted out something, and he repeated back what he'd

00:22:13.522 --> 00:22:17.062
<v Beth Sherman>heard again, for that purpose of making sure everyone in the room heard it before

00:22:17.116 --> 00:22:20.962
<v Beth Sherman>he took that next step. Because if the heckle

00:22:21.026 --> 00:22:24.058
<v Beth Sherman>serves as a set up, then whatever he says to it would serve as the

00:22:24.064 --> 00:22:27.546
<v Beth Sherman>punchline. And you want everyone to have the context. But it turned out that's not

00:22:27.568 --> 00:22:31.046
<v Beth Sherman>what the person had said. The person was talking to the waitress about the chicken

00:22:31.078 --> 00:22:34.926
<v Beth Sherman>fingers, or whatever the order was. It wasn't give him the

00:22:34.948 --> 00:22:38.382
<v Beth Sherman>finger. Are those our fingers? Something that was just

00:22:38.436 --> 00:22:42.254
<v Beth Sherman>totally had nothing to do with him. It was distracting. But

00:22:42.292 --> 00:22:45.970
<v Beth Sherman>had he just jumped down her throat, it would have been

00:22:46.120 --> 00:22:49.490
<v Beth Sherman>inappropriate and unearned, which is a really

00:22:49.640 --> 00:22:53.406
<v Beth Sherman>tough thing. To get away from as you're

00:22:53.438 --> 00:22:56.630
<v Joanne Lockwood>talking. I think about humour as a sort of spectrum.

00:22:57.450 --> 00:23:01.174
<v Joanne Lockwood>There's the big gag that you're setting up and really

00:23:01.212 --> 00:23:04.962
<v Joanne Lockwood>sort of signposting and then trying to get this major laugh. Then there's

00:23:05.106 --> 00:23:08.818
<v Joanne Lockwood>humour, which is kind of an anecdote you're weaving into

00:23:08.844 --> 00:23:12.682
<v Joanne Lockwood>a story and the result is trying to make people

00:23:12.736 --> 00:23:15.980
<v Joanne Lockwood>feel and experience a different emotion inside them.

00:23:16.750 --> 00:23:20.042
<v Joanne Lockwood>So should you use jokes or should you use

00:23:20.096 --> 00:23:23.678
<v Joanne Lockwood>anecdotes that are humorous situation I appreciate, but

00:23:23.764 --> 00:23:27.278
<v Joanne Lockwood>in a professional talk, in a public speaking

00:23:27.444 --> 00:23:31.166
<v Joanne Lockwood>at work, you probably want to aim down the humour route rather than the

00:23:31.188 --> 00:23:34.640
<v Joanne Lockwood>gag route, wouldn't you? Is that what I'm thinking? Well,

00:23:35.010 --> 00:23:38.434
<v Beth Sherman>it depends. I'm not quite sure what you mean by

00:23:38.472 --> 00:23:42.098
<v Beth Sherman>gag. I mean, to me, whatever it is just has to be authentic to you.

00:23:42.184 --> 00:23:46.006
<v Beth Sherman>And if you're not a gag person, everyone has a different sense of

00:23:46.028 --> 00:23:48.150
<v Beth Sherman>humour. I'm quite dry.

00:23:52.490 --> 00:23:56.214
<v Beth Sherman>I might comment on something or allude to something, but

00:23:56.252 --> 00:23:59.834
<v Beth Sherman>I don't always try to hit it over the head because that's just not my

00:23:59.872 --> 00:24:03.446
<v Beth Sherman>style. But when I talk about humour in a professional

00:24:03.478 --> 00:24:07.034
<v Beth Sherman>situation, for speakers, I

00:24:07.072 --> 00:24:10.746
<v Beth Sherman>describe it as a seasoning. Sometimes. You

00:24:10.768 --> 00:24:13.886
<v Beth Sherman>don't always need a lot. If you think of it like salt, if you've got

00:24:13.908 --> 00:24:17.566
<v Beth Sherman>a very heavy talk, then just a little bit

00:24:17.748 --> 00:24:21.406
<v Beth Sherman>is going to be plenty. It's just enough to sort of

00:24:21.428 --> 00:24:24.914
<v Beth Sherman>relieve the tension, relieve a little bit of the pressure, give it some

00:24:24.952 --> 00:24:28.222
<v Beth Sherman>balance so that it's not just unrelentingly

00:24:28.286 --> 00:24:32.066
<v Beth Sherman>sad, but if it's a best man speech, there's an

00:24:32.088 --> 00:24:35.634
<v Beth Sherman>expectation that you're going to use a lot of salt. You want movie theatre

00:24:35.682 --> 00:24:38.838
<v Beth Sherman>popcorn, but sometimes it's really just.

00:24:39.004 --> 00:24:42.754
<v Beth Sherman>But if you put a few grains

00:24:42.802 --> 00:24:46.502
<v Beth Sherman>of sea salt on chocolate, it's just literally just

00:24:46.556 --> 00:24:50.218
<v Beth Sherman>a few grains, it makes it an entirely different experience.

00:24:50.304 --> 00:24:54.010
<v Beth Sherman>But if you just kind of dumped the shaker on it, which is

00:24:54.080 --> 00:24:57.754
<v Beth Sherman>great for popcorn or chips or something like

00:24:57.792 --> 00:25:01.354
<v Beth Sherman>that, it would be inappropriate, it would feel out of balance.

00:25:01.482 --> 00:25:05.310
<v Beth Sherman>So I think it's a matter of who you are and what the situation

00:25:05.460 --> 00:25:09.166
<v Beth Sherman>is. When

00:25:09.188 --> 00:25:12.538
<v Joanne Lockwood>I speak, I'm very conscious around the need

00:25:12.724 --> 00:25:16.290
<v Joanne Lockwood>to speak methodically, rhythmically

00:25:16.630 --> 00:25:19.506
<v Joanne Lockwood>and with a certain cadence that allows people to

00:25:19.528 --> 00:25:23.278
<v Joanne Lockwood>ruminate and absorb. You speak too quickly, it's

00:25:23.294 --> 00:25:27.026
<v Joanne Lockwood>like a machine gun hitting them, isn't it? You can't take anything in. You

00:25:27.048 --> 00:25:30.578
<v Joanne Lockwood>speak too slowly and people are going, what I've got no interest in. So you're

00:25:30.594 --> 00:25:34.342
<v Joanne Lockwood>trying to find that ideal cadence and pace to keep people

00:25:34.396 --> 00:25:38.166
<v Joanne Lockwood>engaged, allow them to digest at the same. For comedy or humour, isn't it? If

00:25:38.188 --> 00:25:40.786
<v Joanne Lockwood>you're not careful, what we do is we try and rush a gag because we're

00:25:40.818 --> 00:25:44.586
<v Joanne Lockwood>nervous or we have to sort of blurt out and then we just move on

00:25:44.608 --> 00:25:48.346
<v Joanne Lockwood>quickly. It's all about the timing in comedy, isn't it? Yeah, it's about the

00:25:48.368 --> 00:25:52.206
<v Beth Sherman>timing and it's really about making it sound natural again. It all

00:25:52.228 --> 00:25:55.150
<v Beth Sherman>goes back to feeling authentic to you. The best

00:25:55.220 --> 00:25:58.666
<v Beth Sherman>laughs that you'll get in a speech

00:25:58.778 --> 00:26:02.446
<v Beth Sherman>are the things that, well, either sound like

00:26:02.468 --> 00:26:06.274
<v Beth Sherman>they've come off the top of your head or really did come off

00:26:06.312 --> 00:26:09.746
<v Beth Sherman>the top of your head. The observations, the asides, things like

00:26:09.768 --> 00:26:13.490
<v Beth Sherman>that. But I generally wouldn't suggest that

00:26:13.560 --> 00:26:17.266
<v Beth Sherman>people put big gags in or big. It's

00:26:17.298 --> 00:26:21.026
<v Beth Sherman>just tough to land things like that, and it puts a lot of pressure

00:26:21.058 --> 00:26:24.374
<v Beth Sherman>on one particular moment rather than

00:26:24.572 --> 00:26:27.538
<v Beth Sherman>distributing a little bit of

00:26:27.644 --> 00:26:31.354
<v Beth Sherman>wonderfulness throughout your speech. Because when

00:26:31.392 --> 00:26:34.934
<v Beth Sherman>it sounds rehearsed, obviously you have to rehearse

00:26:34.982 --> 00:26:38.666
<v Beth Sherman>things, but audiences are smart, they're very perceptive, and

00:26:38.688 --> 00:26:41.742
<v Beth Sherman>when something sounds rehearsed, it sounds

00:26:41.796 --> 00:26:45.182
<v Beth Sherman>inauthentic. And that's not necessarily a bad

00:26:45.236 --> 00:26:48.366
<v Beth Sherman>thing. People want you to sound prepared, and if you're

00:26:48.388 --> 00:26:52.158
<v Beth Sherman>delivering material, if you're delivering serious material or

00:26:52.244 --> 00:26:55.934
<v Beth Sherman>delivering, in comedy terms, straight, as opposed

00:26:55.982 --> 00:26:59.278
<v Beth Sherman>to funny, intentionally funny, if you're

00:26:59.294 --> 00:27:03.074
<v Beth Sherman>delivering information, then there's nothing wrong

00:27:03.112 --> 00:27:06.962
<v Beth Sherman>with it sounding prepared. But if you're delivering comedy and it sounds over

00:27:07.016 --> 00:27:10.678
<v Beth Sherman>prepared, it's diminishing returns. So I think

00:27:10.684 --> 00:27:14.294
<v Beth Sherman>that's another reason to sort of just have small moments and let the small

00:27:14.332 --> 00:27:17.480
<v Beth Sherman>moments add up. Yeah,

00:27:18.330 --> 00:27:20.360
<v Joanne Lockwood>you've heard me speak a few times and

00:27:21.770 --> 00:27:24.922
<v Joanne Lockwood>I'm really conscious about people finding me too

00:27:24.976 --> 00:27:28.794
<v Joanne Lockwood>serious. I've had people say, you're really serious, and I thought,

00:27:28.832 --> 00:27:32.346
<v Joanne Lockwood>you don't know me very well. Because in my day to day

00:27:32.368 --> 00:27:35.886
<v Joanne Lockwood>conversations, my day to day life, I don't take myself seriously. I don't expect other

00:27:35.908 --> 00:27:39.582
<v Joanne Lockwood>people to take me seriously, but I expect people to respect that I am

00:27:39.636 --> 00:27:42.858
<v Joanne Lockwood>serious, but don't take myself seriously, if that makes sense. I'm

00:27:42.954 --> 00:27:46.626
<v Joanne Lockwood>professional with a light heart, and when I do my

00:27:46.648 --> 00:27:50.254
<v Joanne Lockwood>professional speaking, I sometimes find that a gag

00:27:50.302 --> 00:27:54.146
<v Joanne Lockwood>or a witticism or an ironic statement or something will pop into my head

00:27:54.328 --> 00:27:57.806
<v Joanne Lockwood>which is completely unrehearsed yet lands so

00:27:57.848 --> 00:28:01.606
<v Joanne Lockwood>well. I then use it again, because next time I use it, it is

00:28:01.628 --> 00:28:05.394
<v Joanne Lockwood>rehearsed or it is tried and tested. So I don't necessarily

00:28:05.442 --> 00:28:09.126
<v Joanne Lockwood>set out to write gags, but I remember the ones that get the

00:28:09.148 --> 00:28:12.794
<v Joanne Lockwood>laughs and then recycle and bring them in authentically. It's very

00:28:12.832 --> 00:28:16.598
<v Beth Sherman>green. Yes, it's very good for the environment, the recycling of jokes.

00:28:16.774 --> 00:28:20.106
<v Beth Sherman>But I think what that speaks to is that

00:28:20.288 --> 00:28:23.470
<v Beth Sherman>that comedic opportunity that you took advantage of, was

00:28:23.540 --> 00:28:26.874
<v Beth Sherman>authentic to you and to the material.

00:28:27.002 --> 00:28:30.542
<v Beth Sherman>And it wasn't something where you said, I'm going to write

00:28:30.596 --> 00:28:34.366
<v Beth Sherman>something funny here, because that's very hard to do. I have people that

00:28:34.388 --> 00:28:36.658
<v Beth Sherman>come to me and say, I want you to add some jokes to this. I

00:28:36.664 --> 00:28:40.194
<v Beth Sherman>don't have a wand. And I

00:28:40.232 --> 00:28:44.066
<v Beth Sherman>could, hey, I could write it the way I would say it. I

00:28:44.088 --> 00:28:47.298
<v Beth Sherman>could write it the way someone else would say it, but it's not going to

00:28:47.304 --> 00:28:50.966
<v Beth Sherman>sound right coming out of that person's mouth. It's a matter of drawing out,

00:28:50.988 --> 00:28:54.390
<v Beth Sherman>well, what happened next in that story? Or wait, you got fired.

00:28:55.770 --> 00:28:59.254
<v Beth Sherman>What was the ride home like? What was the conversation with your partner?

00:28:59.382 --> 00:29:02.460
<v Beth Sherman>What was the first thing you did the next morning?

00:29:03.230 --> 00:29:06.906
<v Beth Sherman>So trying to find the real moments and

00:29:07.008 --> 00:29:10.246
<v Beth Sherman>bring it a little bit closer to storytelling. And truth is

00:29:10.288 --> 00:29:14.014
<v Beth Sherman>funny, when you

00:29:14.052 --> 00:29:17.598
<v Beth Sherman>have an aside or something spontaneous and you use it again

00:29:17.764 --> 00:29:21.134
<v Beth Sherman>because it was spontaneous the first time, even though you've rehearsed it

00:29:21.172 --> 00:29:24.914
<v Beth Sherman>and you've put it into your set and now you're planning to do it, you

00:29:24.952 --> 00:29:28.802
<v Beth Sherman>probably also have the muscle memory of how spontaneous it felt the first

00:29:28.856 --> 00:29:32.542
<v Beth Sherman>time. So your delivery probably feels

00:29:32.606 --> 00:29:36.306
<v Beth Sherman>spontaneous as well because that's just kind of how

00:29:36.328 --> 00:29:38.850
<v Beth Sherman>it popped out of your mouth originally.

00:29:41.450 --> 00:29:45.142
<v Beth Sherman>It probably doesn't sound as rehearsed as something that just

00:29:45.196 --> 00:29:48.520
<v Beth Sherman>sounded good when you were sitting at home typing on your computer.

00:29:48.970 --> 00:29:52.570
<v Joanne Lockwood>Yeah. I actually find it maybe easier to be

00:29:52.720 --> 00:29:56.314
<v Joanne Lockwood>light hearted or throw a humour in there at the

00:29:56.352 --> 00:30:00.026
<v Joanne Lockwood>beginning because I'm kind of just trying to warm myself up to

00:30:00.048 --> 00:30:03.862
<v Joanne Lockwood>start talking. So it's almost like an icebreaker for me, an icebreaker to the audience,

00:30:03.926 --> 00:30:07.502
<v Joanne Lockwood>to something quick. When I'm in flow in the middle of a talk, I'm probably

00:30:07.556 --> 00:30:11.406
<v Joanne Lockwood>too much in flow unless I've got something. I've got a lot of

00:30:11.428 --> 00:30:15.262
<v Joanne Lockwood>phrases I use unless one of those phrases happens to trigger a thought about something

00:30:15.316 --> 00:30:18.754
<v Joanne Lockwood>lighthearted. But I find the easiest time for me is during the Q a

00:30:18.792 --> 00:30:22.066
<v Joanne Lockwood>section where people are asking questions. Because I'm now

00:30:22.168 --> 00:30:26.018
<v Joanne Lockwood>relaxing my shoulders, I'm now in a different mode. I'm now engaging with the

00:30:26.024 --> 00:30:29.838
<v Joanne Lockwood>audience and trying to entertain them with an answer. So I find

00:30:29.864 --> 00:30:33.686
<v Joanne Lockwood>that I'm more in creative mode during A-Q-A whereas in

00:30:33.708 --> 00:30:37.126
<v Joanne Lockwood>the delivery, I'm more in flow and it's harder to, in my brain to try

00:30:37.148 --> 00:30:40.554
<v Joanne Lockwood>and pause, gag, carry on unless it's kind of

00:30:40.592 --> 00:30:43.626
<v Joanne Lockwood>ingrained into that banter or the pattern I use.

00:30:43.808 --> 00:30:46.460
<v Beth Sherman>Yeah. When I work with people,

00:30:47.390 --> 00:30:50.906
<v Beth Sherman>I always say that there's three places

00:30:51.018 --> 00:30:54.782
<v Beth Sherman>in the speech when humour is really

00:30:54.836 --> 00:30:58.686
<v Beth Sherman>best used and it's very, very technical, it's the beginning, the middle and the

00:30:58.708 --> 00:31:02.286
<v Beth Sherman>end. It's not as hard as it

00:31:02.308 --> 00:31:05.378
<v Beth Sherman>sounds, but at the beginning, when you use it, just as you're saying, when you

00:31:05.384 --> 00:31:09.214
<v Beth Sherman>use it at the beginning, it not only relaxes you, it relaxes the audience

00:31:09.342 --> 00:31:13.042
<v Beth Sherman>and it creates a connection and

00:31:13.096 --> 00:31:16.630
<v Beth Sherman>it creates an expectation, it sets a tone. And

00:31:16.780 --> 00:31:20.194
<v Beth Sherman>with a lot of us, that tone is, you're in safe

00:31:20.242 --> 00:31:23.938
<v Beth Sherman>hands, you're going to enjoy this. I mean, look, we've

00:31:23.954 --> 00:31:27.766
<v Beth Sherman>all sat through talks that

00:31:27.868 --> 00:31:31.594
<v Beth Sherman>we didn't volunteer to attend, and

00:31:31.632 --> 00:31:35.274
<v Beth Sherman>so you can also set a tone of, this isn't going to be painful, this

00:31:35.312 --> 00:31:38.822
<v Beth Sherman>won't suck. Which is really, people really appreciate

00:31:38.966 --> 00:31:42.362
<v Beth Sherman>in the middle, you don't need much in the middle,

00:31:42.496 --> 00:31:46.334
<v Beth Sherman>because that flow that you're in, it's not a matter

00:31:46.372 --> 00:31:50.078
<v Beth Sherman>of you not wanting to distract yourself, it's a matter of you're presenting information.

00:31:50.244 --> 00:31:53.886
<v Beth Sherman>It's not stand up comedy, you're presenting information. So there's not always an

00:31:53.908 --> 00:31:57.554
<v Beth Sherman>opportunity, but in the middle, if there is something that you can

00:31:57.592 --> 00:32:01.298
<v Beth Sherman>add, just a little something, and it sounds like you do, if

00:32:01.304 --> 00:32:05.106
<v Beth Sherman>there's one of the phrases that you say, it

00:32:05.128 --> 00:32:08.946
<v Beth Sherman>sort of perks people up, it reengages your audience. Just in case there's

00:32:08.978 --> 00:32:12.710
<v Beth Sherman>anyone whose mind began to wander. Because

00:32:12.860 --> 00:32:16.406
<v Beth Sherman>when there's a laugh, especially when the speaker is in

00:32:16.428 --> 00:32:19.400
<v Beth Sherman>flow, when suddenly there's a laugh, anyone

00:32:20.090 --> 00:32:23.818
<v Beth Sherman>whose attention has wandered is going to think, wait, what

00:32:23.824 --> 00:32:27.306
<v Beth Sherman>did I miss? What did I miss? I need to lock back in on

00:32:27.328 --> 00:32:31.178
<v Beth Sherman>this. And then at the end, what I

00:32:31.184 --> 00:32:34.446
<v Beth Sherman>like using it at the end is something, and I always recommend people do it.

00:32:34.468 --> 00:32:38.250
<v Beth Sherman>It's something called a callback. And a callback is literally,

00:32:38.330 --> 00:32:41.902
<v Beth Sherman>it's just a reference to whatever the biggest laugh in your piece was.

00:32:42.036 --> 00:32:45.614
<v Beth Sherman>And it's a way to sort of. And if you watch any stand up special,

00:32:45.732 --> 00:32:48.734
<v Beth Sherman>I guarantee you the last joke of the set, the biggest joke of the set

00:32:48.772 --> 00:32:52.554
<v Beth Sherman>is going to be something that references something that happened earlier. So a callback,

00:32:52.602 --> 00:32:55.158
<v Beth Sherman>if you can get a laugh at the end or you can reference whatever it

00:32:55.164 --> 00:32:58.566
<v Beth Sherman>is you said at the very beginning, even you're leaving on a

00:32:58.588 --> 00:33:02.262
<v Beth Sherman>laugh and people's memories are very short,

00:33:02.396 --> 00:33:06.166
<v Beth Sherman>so they will remember. It's much more likely they're going to remember that laugh at

00:33:06.188 --> 00:33:09.686
<v Beth Sherman>the end and think that was really interesting and kind of funny, too.

00:33:09.788 --> 00:33:13.414
<v Beth Sherman>Even if you've got 25 minutes of just information, useful

00:33:13.462 --> 00:33:16.220
<v Beth Sherman>information in the beginning with not a lot of laughs. So

00:33:17.550 --> 00:33:20.986
<v Beth Sherman>you're using it, I think, in just the right way. And when you get to

00:33:21.008 --> 00:33:24.814
<v Beth Sherman>the Q and A, you're there more as Jo the person than

00:33:24.852 --> 00:33:27.818
<v Beth Sherman>Jo the speaker. So you kind of have licence

00:33:27.994 --> 00:33:31.326
<v Beth Sherman>to relax and have a little bit of

00:33:31.348 --> 00:33:34.670
<v Beth Sherman>banter. I saw John Bishop, the comedian,

00:33:35.350 --> 00:33:38.466
<v Joanne Lockwood>live show he did at the guild hall in Portsmouth, and he talked about his

00:33:38.488 --> 00:33:42.338
<v Joanne Lockwood>callbacks. He told about, I don't know, let's just say nine

00:33:42.504 --> 00:33:46.306
<v Joanne Lockwood>different stories throughout his set. And I

00:33:46.328 --> 00:33:49.810
<v Joanne Lockwood>remember one was about a llama or something, or alpaca or llama in there. Anyway,

00:33:49.880 --> 00:33:53.494
<v Joanne Lockwood>that's the one I really remember from it. And you went through it and you

00:33:53.532 --> 00:33:57.126
<v Joanne Lockwood>didn't really know if these were true stories or they were based on anything there.

00:33:57.228 --> 00:34:00.998
<v Joanne Lockwood>But right at the end, as he was finishing off, he put a slideshow up

00:34:01.084 --> 00:34:04.746
<v Joanne Lockwood>of each slide was something that related to the

00:34:04.768 --> 00:34:07.706
<v Joanne Lockwood>story he told. So I always remember the llama being there. So he was with

00:34:07.728 --> 00:34:11.482
<v Joanne Lockwood>the llama doing this and he went through it and thought. So he

00:34:11.536 --> 00:34:15.294
<v Joanne Lockwood>immediately took all this stuff he told you and then gave

00:34:15.332 --> 00:34:19.006
<v Joanne Lockwood>it a fact. It happened. And that made the gags and

00:34:19.108 --> 00:34:22.666
<v Joanne Lockwood>the enjoyment even more powerful because you then shared

00:34:22.698 --> 00:34:26.366
<v Joanne Lockwood>that another laugh by going, yes, I remember that

00:34:26.388 --> 00:34:29.774
<v Joanne Lockwood>story. Yes, it did happen. And I thought that was so expertly

00:34:29.822 --> 00:34:33.506
<v Joanne Lockwood>done. And that's effectively a callback as well. It's refreshing that

00:34:33.528 --> 00:34:36.754
<v Joanne Lockwood>mind or putting you back into that moment where you laughed the first time, to

00:34:36.792 --> 00:34:39.446
<v Joanne Lockwood>laugh a second time without him having to do anything. He just stood there and

00:34:39.468 --> 00:34:43.186
<v Joanne Lockwood>went. I thought, that's really powerful. I mean, that sounds beautifully

00:34:43.218 --> 00:34:46.946
<v Beth Sherman>constructed. Yeah, it's really effective because it creates

00:34:46.978 --> 00:34:50.826
<v Beth Sherman>a sense of community with the audience. Also, think of. We have this in

00:34:50.848 --> 00:34:54.646
<v Beth Sherman>common now. We're all laughing about this. We've had this shared experience, and this shared

00:34:54.678 --> 00:34:58.394
<v Beth Sherman>experience is something that we're laughing about.

00:34:58.592 --> 00:35:02.394
<v Beth Sherman>It's amazing because he's created a community with

00:35:02.432 --> 00:35:06.078
<v Beth Sherman>the same reference points. It's brilliant. Yeah.

00:35:06.164 --> 00:35:09.658
<v Joanne Lockwood>As a professional speaker, I find that as well. You come out, you deliver

00:35:09.834 --> 00:35:13.486
<v Joanne Lockwood>your set, your gig, your talk, whatever you want to call it, and you come

00:35:13.508 --> 00:35:16.682
<v Joanne Lockwood>out and you're networking with the audience afterwards, you can feel that shared

00:35:16.746 --> 00:35:20.514
<v Joanne Lockwood>community picking up on the things you said and they're repeating it back

00:35:20.552 --> 00:35:24.350
<v Joanne Lockwood>to you. And it's kind of really powerful to know you've

00:35:24.430 --> 00:35:28.082
<v Joanne Lockwood>engendered that into somebody, that feeling and that memory

00:35:28.146 --> 00:35:31.814
<v Joanne Lockwood>and that passion you've given them. I guess comedy is the same.

00:35:31.852 --> 00:35:35.526
<v Joanne Lockwood>You're giving people that brain chemicals and that endorphins and that

00:35:35.548 --> 00:35:39.218
<v Joanne Lockwood>happy feeling, aren't you? Yeah. And it means you've made impact.

00:35:39.314 --> 00:35:43.130
<v Beth Sherman>If people are quoting you back to you, you've done something right because

00:35:43.200 --> 00:35:47.034
<v Beth Sherman>they're remembering what you said. Anyone can just speak and

00:35:47.072 --> 00:35:50.726
<v Beth Sherman>have it sort of flow into people, and then what they

00:35:50.768 --> 00:35:54.446
<v Beth Sherman>retain is how much they retain is sort of.

00:35:54.468 --> 00:35:58.254
<v Beth Sherman>Who knows? But if they're repeating you back to you, if they're quoting you,

00:35:58.372 --> 00:36:02.206
<v Beth Sherman>then you've succeeded, because why

00:36:02.228 --> 00:36:06.058
<v Beth Sherman>else are you up there? And I'm

00:36:06.074 --> 00:36:08.402
<v Joanne Lockwood>going to quote you back to you now, because I want to hear this story

00:36:08.456 --> 00:36:12.302
<v Joanne Lockwood>again about the Dallas Cowboys. For the Dallas Cowboys.

00:36:12.366 --> 00:36:14.786
<v Joanne Lockwood>I want to hear this story again. I'm sure our listeners would love to hear

00:36:14.808 --> 00:36:18.514
<v Joanne Lockwood>this. A bit of background. You were in

00:36:18.552 --> 00:36:22.226
<v Joanne Lockwood>Iraq, as the Americans call it. We call it Iraq, but Americans call it Iraq.

00:36:22.258 --> 00:36:25.846
<v Joanne Lockwood>And I have an iPhone, not an Iraq. But,

00:36:25.868 --> 00:36:29.206
<v Joanne Lockwood>yeah, you could tell us a story about how you went out there and what

00:36:29.228 --> 00:36:32.906
<v Joanne Lockwood>were you doing. Well, it sounds. Especially saying it, to

00:36:32.928 --> 00:36:36.746
<v Beth Sherman>me, it sounds so much more exciting when you say you

00:36:36.768 --> 00:36:39.850
<v Beth Sherman>have a story about the Dallas Cowboy cheerleaders. Boy, I wish.

00:36:42.270 --> 00:36:46.042
<v Beth Sherman>Says the middle aged lesbian. Well,

00:36:46.096 --> 00:36:49.566
<v Beth Sherman>yeah, in one of my talks, I talk about

00:36:49.588 --> 00:36:53.338
<v Beth Sherman>humour. Well, it's about humour as a tool for connection and how to

00:36:53.364 --> 00:36:56.578
<v Beth Sherman>use humour to connect with people who might, on the

00:36:56.584 --> 00:37:00.354
<v Beth Sherman>surface, be very different from you. And in stand up

00:37:00.392 --> 00:37:03.634
<v Beth Sherman>comedy, you have to make that connection very,

00:37:03.672 --> 00:37:07.458
<v Beth Sherman>very. I went. When I was doing a lot of

00:37:07.464 --> 00:37:10.966
<v Beth Sherman>stand up, I did a military tour of Iraq. I went to

00:37:10.988 --> 00:37:14.390
<v Beth Sherman>Iraq. Yes. A

00:37:14.460 --> 00:37:18.070
<v Beth Sherman>troubled place. America had its hands all over,

00:37:18.220 --> 00:37:22.042
<v Beth Sherman>but I went there to do a military tour. And I also

00:37:22.096 --> 00:37:25.930
<v Beth Sherman>talk about when you're looking for opportunities, for comedic opportunities,

00:37:26.270 --> 00:37:29.210
<v Beth Sherman>you don't always have to think of gags and puns.

00:37:29.890 --> 00:37:33.678
<v Beth Sherman>Truth is funny. Real life is funny. So

00:37:33.844 --> 00:37:37.294
<v Beth Sherman>when I did this military tour, and it was amazing, we went to

00:37:37.332 --> 00:37:40.714
<v Beth Sherman>combat outposts and forward operating bases

00:37:40.842 --> 00:37:44.674
<v Beth Sherman>and we went on Blackhawk helicopters. It was four or five shows

00:37:44.712 --> 00:37:48.546
<v Beth Sherman>a day. But the people at

00:37:48.568 --> 00:37:52.322
<v Beth Sherman>these forward operating bases, they're 19 year old kids who had not

00:37:52.376 --> 00:37:56.130
<v Beth Sherman>seen anyone other than the 20 or so people that

00:37:56.280 --> 00:38:00.038
<v Beth Sherman>guys that they were with for weeks at a time. So a lot of

00:38:00.044 --> 00:38:03.894
<v Beth Sherman>our job was just to be a different person. So I went up and

00:38:04.012 --> 00:38:07.222
<v Beth Sherman>my opening joke in front of these

00:38:07.276 --> 00:38:10.506
<v Beth Sherman>kids was truth. It wasn't even a joke. It

00:38:10.528 --> 00:38:14.006
<v Beth Sherman>was the big bases. Get the Dallas Cowboy cheerleaders,

00:38:14.118 --> 00:38:16.700
<v Beth Sherman>you get me. And then in my talk,

00:38:18.030 --> 00:38:21.818
<v Beth Sherman>I show a slide of the Dallas cowboy cheerleaders. Because in the States,

00:38:21.984 --> 00:38:25.806
<v Beth Sherman>people have an immediate picture in their head, but less so in

00:38:25.828 --> 00:38:29.626
<v Beth Sherman>the UK. But the picture is, it's 22 year old blonde

00:38:29.658 --> 00:38:33.378
<v Beth Sherman>women kicking their legs up in the air. I mean, they're the

00:38:33.384 --> 00:38:36.820
<v Beth Sherman>cheerleaders for an american football team and

00:38:37.750 --> 00:38:40.846
<v Beth Sherman>it's sort of a Barbie image. So there's always a laugh

00:38:40.958 --> 00:38:44.738
<v Beth Sherman>here. But when I say that the

00:38:44.744 --> 00:38:48.360
<v Beth Sherman>big bases get the Dallas Cowboy cheerleaders, you get me. And here

00:38:48.810 --> 00:38:52.486
<v Beth Sherman>in the States, there's an immediate big laugh. In the

00:38:52.508 --> 00:38:56.226
<v Beth Sherman>UK, there's a titter. And then you show the Dallas

00:38:56.258 --> 00:38:59.340
<v Beth Sherman>Cowboy cheerleaders and I say, yeah, there's a difference.

00:38:59.950 --> 00:39:03.526
<v Beth Sherman>And that difference did not go unnoticed by those 19 year old marines.

00:39:03.638 --> 00:39:06.794
<v Beth Sherman>But that's not even a joke. It was just

00:39:06.832 --> 00:39:10.646
<v Beth Sherman>truth. There's no pun, there's no funny

00:39:10.678 --> 00:39:14.426
<v Beth Sherman>turn of phrase, there's no setup. Well, I guess

00:39:14.448 --> 00:39:17.678
<v Beth Sherman>there's a set up and a punchline. The setup is the big bases get the

00:39:17.684 --> 00:39:21.200
<v Beth Sherman>Daleks, jailbreak cheerleaders, you get me. But on paper

00:39:21.890 --> 00:39:25.566
<v Beth Sherman>it's hardly even a joke. But. So when you're looking to add humour

00:39:25.598 --> 00:39:28.900
<v Beth Sherman>to something, it doesn't always have to sound

00:39:29.350 --> 00:39:32.994
<v Beth Sherman>like a joke. Sometimes just truth, seen in a different

00:39:33.032 --> 00:39:36.566
<v Beth Sherman>way, presented in a way that is just open and vulnerable and

00:39:36.588 --> 00:39:40.102
<v Beth Sherman>honest, can do the job. Not just as well, I think,

00:39:40.156 --> 00:39:43.746
<v Beth Sherman>better than anything that's prepared, because you said. Earlier,

00:39:43.938 --> 00:39:47.606
<v Joanne Lockwood>at that moment, you and the audience have a

00:39:47.628 --> 00:39:51.354
<v Joanne Lockwood>shared experience of you being there, them listening. So you're talking

00:39:51.392 --> 00:39:55.126
<v Joanne Lockwood>about the situation, the context they're in, with an irony

00:39:55.158 --> 00:39:58.762
<v Joanne Lockwood>or a reference of this could have been you, if you were a different base,

00:39:58.816 --> 00:40:02.630
<v Joanne Lockwood>but actually, I'm here instead. So I think, yeah, you're bringing

00:40:02.710 --> 00:40:06.446
<v Joanne Lockwood>that common, shared understanding of the situation into that. And so the

00:40:06.468 --> 00:40:10.078
<v Joanne Lockwood>humour comes from that, doesn't it? So I think it works really well.

00:40:10.164 --> 00:40:13.966
<v Joanne Lockwood>When I'm on stage, I'm basing the humour I want to use on

00:40:13.988 --> 00:40:17.678
<v Joanne Lockwood>the audience I'm with because they need to understand it. I

00:40:17.684 --> 00:40:21.374
<v Joanne Lockwood>think, as I said to you earlier, you got to be careful around bringing humour

00:40:21.422 --> 00:40:25.106
<v Joanne Lockwood>in, into an audience that may not understand that humour. So, again,

00:40:25.208 --> 00:40:28.406
<v Joanne Lockwood>by having the context of who's in front of you, you can then

00:40:28.508 --> 00:40:32.214
<v Joanne Lockwood>target your witty remarks or your anecdotes to the

00:40:32.252 --> 00:40:36.086
<v Joanne Lockwood>audience and not to another audience where it did work well.

00:40:36.108 --> 00:40:39.110
<v Beth Sherman>Exactly. And that's why I realised I had to add the slide

00:40:39.610 --> 00:40:43.306
<v Beth Sherman>had, because I realised that here I'm delivering in front of

00:40:43.328 --> 00:40:47.034
<v Beth Sherman>people who may have a sense of who the Dallas Cowboy cheerleaders were,

00:40:47.072 --> 00:40:50.220
<v Beth Sherman>but they don't have an immediate image in their head. So

00:40:50.610 --> 00:40:54.126
<v Beth Sherman>that was because I was aware of who these audiences are and the

00:40:54.148 --> 00:40:57.454
<v Beth Sherman>differences, but the connection that it

00:40:57.492 --> 00:41:01.040
<v Beth Sherman>makes between the speaker and the audience. Yeah,

00:41:02.210 --> 00:41:05.886
<v Beth Sherman>it's a great way to add humour. At the beginning of your talk, everyone wants

00:41:05.908 --> 00:41:09.374
<v Beth Sherman>to be funny up front. Everyone wants to start with a laugh, but simply

00:41:09.422 --> 00:41:13.266
<v Beth Sherman>acknowledging the elephant in the room can do that. And the elephant in the

00:41:13.288 --> 00:41:16.566
<v Beth Sherman>room was a bunch of 19 year old marines looking at

00:41:16.588 --> 00:41:20.246
<v Beth Sherman>me, middle aged, short haired lesbian, thinking,

00:41:20.428 --> 00:41:22.680
<v Beth Sherman>it's nice that see came, but

00:41:25.050 --> 00:41:28.806
<v Beth Sherman>these are sort of the quintessential. They were 19 year old

00:41:28.828 --> 00:41:32.666
<v Beth Sherman>marines, the quintessential red blooded american male. I was not their first choice. I

00:41:32.688 --> 00:41:36.042
<v Beth Sherman>was probably older than most of their mothers, even at

00:41:36.176 --> 00:41:39.114
<v Beth Sherman>38 at the time. So I'm just

00:41:39.152 --> 00:41:42.542
<v Beth Sherman>acknowledging what they're thinking. But me doing that

00:41:42.676 --> 00:41:45.690
<v Beth Sherman>means that they can then appreciate,

00:41:45.850 --> 00:41:49.566
<v Beth Sherman>oh, she's thinking about us. She understands what

00:41:49.588 --> 00:41:53.358
<v Beth Sherman>we're thinking. It just creates that. Well, it creates

00:41:53.374 --> 00:41:56.100
<v Beth Sherman>that dialogue. Oh, yeah,

00:41:57.270 --> 00:42:01.106
<v Beth Sherman>it worked every time, which is pretty

00:42:01.128 --> 00:42:04.798
<v Beth Sherman>much everything you can hope for. But I've

00:42:04.814 --> 00:42:08.470
<v Beth Sherman>watched you do that too. I've watched you open one of my favourite

00:42:10.410 --> 00:42:14.118
<v Beth Sherman>thing I've seen you done, and I love watching you speak, but

00:42:14.204 --> 00:42:17.414
<v Beth Sherman>I saw you speaking at a day that was dedicated to

00:42:17.532 --> 00:42:21.254
<v Beth Sherman>impostor syndrome, and you walked up on stage. And

00:42:21.292 --> 00:42:24.858
<v Beth Sherman>again, this all goes to things don't have to sound like a

00:42:24.864 --> 00:42:27.466
<v Beth Sherman>joke. Truth is funny, and things don't have to sound like a joke, and it

00:42:27.488 --> 00:42:30.106
<v Beth Sherman>doesn't have to be a pun, and it doesn't have to have water shooting out

00:42:30.128 --> 00:42:33.630
<v Beth Sherman>of the bow tie and the big floppy shoes and a hat.

00:42:34.370 --> 00:42:38.062
<v Beth Sherman>You walked up on stage and you said, almost

00:42:38.116 --> 00:42:41.390
<v Beth Sherman>as a throwaway, what do I know about impostor syndrome?

00:42:41.730 --> 00:42:45.418
<v Beth Sherman>And it was a slow burn and you let it sit there. You

00:42:45.444 --> 00:42:49.202
<v Beth Sherman>let the fuse burn all the way down to

00:42:49.256 --> 00:42:52.946
<v Beth Sherman>the full firecracker. And I could see people. I knew what you were

00:42:52.968 --> 00:42:56.806
<v Beth Sherman>doing and you could really see the audience almost do the math. You could see

00:42:56.828 --> 00:42:59.320
<v Beth Sherman>them go, wait, hold, carry the seven.

00:43:01.850 --> 00:43:05.558
<v Beth Sherman>And it was a huge laugh that blew the doors off the place. It

00:43:05.564 --> 00:43:09.318
<v Beth Sherman>was absolutely wonderful. But again, it wasn't

00:43:09.494 --> 00:43:13.046
<v Beth Sherman>a big cartoony. Here, I'm doing a joke,

00:43:13.158 --> 00:43:16.650
<v Beth Sherman>just a little bit of truth, but I think it got you 100

00:43:16.720 --> 00:43:20.506
<v Beth Sherman>times. Anything any gag would have. And you knew that it

00:43:20.528 --> 00:43:24.160
<v Joanne Lockwood>was the truth. It was the truth, yeah, it was truth. What do I know?

00:43:24.690 --> 00:43:27.898
<v Joanne Lockwood>My impostor syndrome was kicking in and going, what do I know about impostor

00:43:27.914 --> 00:43:31.710
<v Joanne Lockwood>syndrome? It was kind of prepared.

00:43:32.210 --> 00:43:35.614
<v Joanne Lockwood>I don't know about you, but when I professionally speak, it's always about the first

00:43:35.652 --> 00:43:39.154
<v Joanne Lockwood>line or the first 10 seconds. Five to 10 seconds that

00:43:39.192 --> 00:43:43.026
<v Joanne Lockwood>grab that hook where you get the audience, and I have a standard set of

00:43:43.048 --> 00:43:45.986
<v Joanne Lockwood>openings I tend to use, and I oscillate between them, depending on how I feel.

00:43:46.088 --> 00:43:49.294
<v Joanne Lockwood>But that day, it wasn't a prepared

00:43:49.342 --> 00:43:53.126
<v Joanne Lockwood>speech. I had about half an hour's notice to go and do something and ask

00:43:53.148 --> 00:43:56.886
<v Joanne Lockwood>it in the audience, thinking, right, if I can get my first line out, the

00:43:56.908 --> 00:44:00.614
<v Joanne Lockwood>rest will happen. I trust my brain enough to be able to keep going. Once

00:44:00.652 --> 00:44:03.526
<v Joanne Lockwood>I've got the first bit out, I'll just sit there thinking, what do I know

00:44:03.548 --> 00:44:06.166
<v Joanne Lockwood>about, what am I going to talk about? So I was sitting there in the

00:44:06.188 --> 00:44:09.846
<v Joanne Lockwood>audience, my impostor syndrome was kicking in, big tone, not knowing what to talk

00:44:09.868 --> 00:44:13.326
<v Joanne Lockwood>about. And it just came to me that that was, what do I know about

00:44:13.348 --> 00:44:16.846
<v Joanne Lockwood>imposter syndrome? It became the obvious first line, as you

00:44:16.868 --> 00:44:20.586
<v Joanne Lockwood>say, it landed well, and you say it's a slow burn.

00:44:20.618 --> 00:44:24.346
<v Joanne Lockwood>But then when people started laughing, the laughing spread quickly, didn't

00:44:24.378 --> 00:44:28.066
<v Joanne Lockwood>it? And I let it carry on. And that gave me five to

00:44:28.088 --> 00:44:31.060
<v Joanne Lockwood>10 seconds of thinking time as well.

00:44:31.430 --> 00:44:35.106
<v Joanne Lockwood>So I think that's really important sometimes, is when I really want to work out

00:44:35.128 --> 00:44:38.646
<v Joanne Lockwood>what I want to say next. If it's not rehearsed, I need a little bit

00:44:38.668 --> 00:44:42.466
<v Joanne Lockwood>of thinking. And that bought me time to become comfortable with the stage, comfortable

00:44:42.498 --> 00:44:46.086
<v Joanne Lockwood>with the audience, set some credibility and then go for it. And

00:44:46.108 --> 00:44:49.878
<v Joanne Lockwood>then it all went into flow from there. And it did the same thing for

00:44:49.884 --> 00:44:53.594
<v Beth Sherman>the audience. I mean, it has the exact same effect on the audience. But

00:44:53.712 --> 00:44:57.466
<v Beth Sherman>can I ask you something? As I took, and I thought that was why

00:44:57.488 --> 00:45:00.874
<v Beth Sherman>the joke worked. But we all see things from a different

00:45:00.912 --> 00:45:04.526
<v Beth Sherman>perspective. I took your imposter syndrome joke to be a

00:45:04.548 --> 00:45:08.334
<v Beth Sherman>reference not to just you speaking on the day, but I took

00:45:08.372 --> 00:45:11.550
<v Beth Sherman>that to be a reference to your identity.

00:45:12.470 --> 00:45:15.730
<v Joanne Lockwood>Yeah, completely. I have immense

00:45:16.230 --> 00:45:20.034
<v Joanne Lockwood>imposter syndrome about my gender identity around some things

00:45:20.072 --> 00:45:22.580
<v Joanne Lockwood>I speak about. What do I know?

00:45:23.750 --> 00:45:26.934
<v Joanne Lockwood>It's less so now, because I've been speaking

00:45:27.132 --> 00:45:30.694
<v Joanne Lockwood>around EDi for about seven or eight years

00:45:30.732 --> 00:45:34.550
<v Joanne Lockwood>now, but I still have that echo of the first

00:45:34.620 --> 00:45:38.406
<v Joanne Lockwood>year or the first month or the first year where you're still trying to

00:45:38.428 --> 00:45:42.154
<v Joanne Lockwood>find your feet. And I still remember that. So it's not

00:45:42.192 --> 00:45:45.882
<v Joanne Lockwood>as dominant as it once was, because I've now got social

00:45:45.936 --> 00:45:49.706
<v Joanne Lockwood>proof, if you like, that I know what I'm talking about, or people say,

00:45:49.728 --> 00:45:53.414
<v Joanne Lockwood>I know what I'm talking about. I've got more confidence in my own gender identity

00:45:53.462 --> 00:45:57.274
<v Joanne Lockwood>in myself because I've been walking in these shoes

00:45:57.322 --> 00:46:01.102
<v Joanne Lockwood>now for seven or eight years. But the memory of those early days

00:46:01.236 --> 00:46:04.834
<v Joanne Lockwood>still stays with me, so I haven't shaken it off. It's just maybe

00:46:05.032 --> 00:46:08.594
<v Joanne Lockwood>buried a little bit. I'm not sure I'll ever lose it

00:46:08.712 --> 00:46:12.466
<v Joanne Lockwood>in the same way. I heard

00:46:12.488 --> 00:46:16.226
<v Joanne Lockwood>someone describe it once as when you're trans, if you

00:46:16.248 --> 00:46:19.942
<v Joanne Lockwood>think about, you've got people who are native born in the country,

00:46:19.996 --> 00:46:23.094
<v Joanne Lockwood>you've got people who come on holiday, and you've got people who

00:46:23.132 --> 00:46:26.758
<v Joanne Lockwood>migrate. So there are people who are tourists, basically.

00:46:26.924 --> 00:46:30.774
<v Joanne Lockwood>They do a bit of gender cross dressing. They can't, maybe

00:46:30.812 --> 00:46:34.378
<v Joanne Lockwood>at the weekends, whatever. So they're kind of tourists. They pop in and pop out.

00:46:34.544 --> 00:46:38.346
<v Joanne Lockwood>And I migrated, so I moved into the country, but I'll never

00:46:38.368 --> 00:46:42.154
<v Joanne Lockwood>be a native in the same way that whilst you've been here 20 years

00:46:42.192 --> 00:46:45.822
<v Joanne Lockwood>in this country, you've still got american roots and your history

00:46:45.876 --> 00:46:49.726
<v Joanne Lockwood>from there. So it's that little bit of an imposter syndrome maybe you face as

00:46:49.748 --> 00:46:53.566
<v Joanne Lockwood>a Brit, because you're not truly a Brit. I'm not truly a

00:46:53.588 --> 00:46:57.406
<v Joanne Lockwood>native woman in those sort of terms. I always have that kind of impostor

00:46:57.438 --> 00:47:00.766
<v Joanne Lockwood>syndrome around that. I'm just an immigrant

00:47:00.958 --> 00:47:04.770
<v Joanne Lockwood>into the gender, if you like. Yeah, well, it's almost speaking

00:47:04.840 --> 00:47:08.534
<v Beth Sherman>something fluently as a second language. And I've only been here not quite three

00:47:08.572 --> 00:47:12.294
<v Beth Sherman>years. I've been with my english partner for that long, so

00:47:12.332 --> 00:47:16.022
<v Beth Sherman>I'm even worse, I'm even newer. But yeah,

00:47:16.076 --> 00:47:19.634
<v Beth Sherman>I think that's a great analogy. I mean, I always felt

00:47:19.762 --> 00:47:23.574
<v Beth Sherman>I was speaking about gender. Most of my career, I was the only woman

00:47:23.622 --> 00:47:26.842
<v Beth Sherman>in the room. In. In comedy, or at least in american television shows,

00:47:26.976 --> 00:47:30.710
<v Beth Sherman>there's a writer's room, it's a group of writers,

00:47:30.790 --> 00:47:34.150
<v Beth Sherman>and one person will get assigned. It's a

00:47:34.160 --> 00:47:37.966
<v Beth Sherman>team, and one person will get assigned to write the first draught of something,

00:47:38.068 --> 00:47:41.694
<v Beth Sherman>and then that comes into the room to get punched up as a group, add

00:47:41.732 --> 00:47:45.486
<v Beth Sherman>humour and polish and things like that. And for a lot of my

00:47:45.508 --> 00:47:48.226
<v Beth Sherman>career, I was the only woman in the room. And for a lot of my

00:47:48.248 --> 00:47:51.954
<v Beth Sherman>career, the hosts. I worked a lot in comedy variety in late night, which

00:47:51.992 --> 00:47:55.358
<v Beth Sherman>is sort of a Graham Norton, but five nights a week, sort of a

00:47:55.384 --> 00:47:58.566
<v Beth Sherman>structure. I was the only woman in the room, and

00:47:58.748 --> 00:48:02.358
<v Beth Sherman>so I was writing jokes for

00:48:02.524 --> 00:48:06.326
<v Beth Sherman>the host. So putting myself in that situation, but I

00:48:06.348 --> 00:48:09.414
<v Beth Sherman>mean, I was essentially writing. I was speaking

00:48:09.532 --> 00:48:13.366
<v Beth Sherman>guy. It's not my first language, it's

00:48:13.398 --> 00:48:17.034
<v Beth Sherman>not my experience, especially at the time, I have never been,

00:48:17.072 --> 00:48:19.994
<v Beth Sherman>but especially at the time when I was in my early twenty s and thirty

00:48:20.032 --> 00:48:23.200
<v Beth Sherman>s, I've never been a middle aged white guy. But

00:48:24.690 --> 00:48:28.366
<v Beth Sherman>maybe I will be someday. But, yeah, I've never been so I

00:48:28.388 --> 00:48:32.206
<v Beth Sherman>was always writing as someone else, which, look, everyone in the room was writing for

00:48:32.228 --> 00:48:35.906
<v Beth Sherman>the host, so they were all writing for someone else. But the

00:48:35.928 --> 00:48:39.106
<v Beth Sherman>perspective on the world and how they saw women and how they. I mean, it

00:48:39.128 --> 00:48:42.690
<v Beth Sherman>was just very male, and that

00:48:42.760 --> 00:48:46.418
<v Beth Sherman>wasn't who I was. And so I did feel

00:48:46.504 --> 00:48:50.242
<v Beth Sherman>very much that I was speaking a second language.

00:48:50.306 --> 00:48:53.346
<v Beth Sherman>I was fluent in it and I was there willingly. I'd

00:48:53.378 --> 00:48:57.206
<v Beth Sherman>emigrated, or I was an immigrant who was happy to be

00:48:57.228 --> 00:49:00.874
<v Beth Sherman>there. But there were times when I think

00:49:00.912 --> 00:49:04.294
<v Beth Sherman>my accent made me stand out, if I can torture

00:49:04.342 --> 00:49:08.042
<v Beth Sherman>the metaphor even more. As you were talking there,

00:49:08.096 --> 00:49:11.754
<v Joanne Lockwood>I was thinking, there is definitely a different humour

00:49:11.802 --> 00:49:15.630
<v Joanne Lockwood>base for masculine and feminine identities, if you like.

00:49:15.700 --> 00:49:18.974
<v Joanne Lockwood>I've noticed that having gender transitioned, the humour I

00:49:19.012 --> 00:49:22.766
<v Joanne Lockwood>once was bathing in, in terms of my friends and

00:49:22.788 --> 00:49:26.494
<v Joanne Lockwood>the social circles I had was very masculine. And the humour I

00:49:26.532 --> 00:49:30.226
<v Joanne Lockwood>now bathed in with my circle of friends is very feminine. And there

00:49:30.248 --> 00:49:33.906
<v Joanne Lockwood>is a huge difference between the subjects of the

00:49:33.928 --> 00:49:37.294
<v Joanne Lockwood>joke, how women will often use

00:49:37.432 --> 00:49:41.046
<v Joanne Lockwood>language to describe their partner or husband in a derogatory way.

00:49:41.068 --> 00:49:44.022
<v Joanne Lockwood>And all the women go here. Mine too. There's this kind of common

00:49:44.076 --> 00:49:47.846
<v Joanne Lockwood>understanding. But men denigrate their partner, their

00:49:47.868 --> 00:49:50.966
<v Joanne Lockwood>wives, in a different way, because they tend to build them up and say, my

00:49:50.988 --> 00:49:53.738
<v Joanne Lockwood>wife's amazing all the time, and they want to make it sound like they got

00:49:53.744 --> 00:49:57.146
<v Joanne Lockwood>the perfect relationship, whereas wives want to say how shit their relationship

00:49:57.248 --> 00:50:01.034
<v Joanne Lockwood>is and their husband's such a low life, and that gets

00:50:01.072 --> 00:50:04.720
<v Joanne Lockwood>the laughs from a different perspective on the same relationship. And

00:50:05.490 --> 00:50:09.278
<v Joanne Lockwood>I can pick up that gender coded language and that gender coded humour. And

00:50:09.364 --> 00:50:13.198
<v Joanne Lockwood>I sometimes find it really tricky to listen to male humour these days

00:50:13.284 --> 00:50:16.734
<v Joanne Lockwood>because it really triggers me. Yeah, I can definitely see

00:50:16.772 --> 00:50:20.594
<v Beth Sherman>that. Especially a lot of my experience in these writers rooms, it was with

00:50:20.632 --> 00:50:24.354
<v Beth Sherman>younger guys, just because we all sort of aged and younger guys definitely

00:50:24.392 --> 00:50:28.086
<v Beth Sherman>have a different experience. Level of experience with

00:50:28.108 --> 00:50:31.926
<v Beth Sherman>women and a different level of maturity. Yeah. The difference between male and

00:50:31.948 --> 00:50:35.526
<v Beth Sherman>female. Yeah, I think that's a really interesting

00:50:35.628 --> 00:50:38.938
<v Beth Sherman>observation. I'm trying to not speak in

00:50:39.104 --> 00:50:41.900
<v Beth Sherman>generalities, though. I think they apply.

00:50:43.230 --> 00:50:46.666
<v Joanne Lockwood>Yeah, we obviously appreciate we are generalising and

00:50:46.688 --> 00:50:50.426
<v Joanne Lockwood>stereotyping an entire gender, if you're not careful, and

00:50:50.448 --> 00:50:53.840
<v Joanne Lockwood>making the dispersion against 50% of the population. But, yeah,

00:50:54.770 --> 00:50:58.366
<v Joanne Lockwood>I'd use the word tends to be rather than absolute. Kind

00:50:58.388 --> 00:51:01.838
<v Joanne Lockwood>of tends to be in this direction. Sure. And I

00:51:01.844 --> 00:51:05.154
<v Beth Sherman>think one of the things that you're noticing is that because women

00:51:05.352 --> 00:51:08.866
<v Beth Sherman>tend to be more. Maybe by necessity, I don't know if it's nature or

00:51:08.888 --> 00:51:12.130
<v Beth Sherman>nurture, but tend to be more emotionally intelligent

00:51:14.470 --> 00:51:18.278
<v Beth Sherman>by which also the humour would, I think, tend to

00:51:18.364 --> 00:51:21.814
<v Beth Sherman>have a little bit more emotional intelligence, often using

00:51:21.852 --> 00:51:25.554
<v Beth Sherman>the qualifying words and what you're

00:51:25.602 --> 00:51:29.046
<v Beth Sherman>talking about. Also that, yeah, women, as a lot of the male

00:51:29.078 --> 00:51:32.602
<v Beth Sherman>humour, or at least sort of more traditional male humour, has

00:51:32.656 --> 00:51:35.962
<v Beth Sherman>been guys talking about women sort of as

00:51:36.096 --> 00:51:39.866
<v Beth Sherman>extension of themselves. So they are competitive with one

00:51:39.888 --> 00:51:43.678
<v Beth Sherman>another and their partner, or whoever it

00:51:43.684 --> 00:51:47.406
<v Beth Sherman>is that they're talking about, the measure of that person reflects on

00:51:47.428 --> 00:51:51.034
<v Beth Sherman>them. It's really not about the. Whereas

00:51:51.082 --> 00:51:53.780
<v Beth Sherman>with a woman, she's talking about her experience

00:51:54.550 --> 00:51:58.100
<v Beth Sherman>and trying to get to the truth of the experience

00:51:58.710 --> 00:52:01.460
<v Beth Sherman>in that example. And with guys,

00:52:02.310 --> 00:52:05.220
<v Beth Sherman>well, it's more about just how he comes across.

00:52:05.910 --> 00:52:09.350
<v Joanne Lockwood>Let me give you an example which hopefully you'll find

00:52:09.500 --> 00:52:13.302
<v Joanne Lockwood>light hearted, humorous. I was out with a group of my male friends in

00:52:13.356 --> 00:52:17.126
<v Joanne Lockwood>Bricklane, I think curry and few beers, whatever,

00:52:17.308 --> 00:52:20.998
<v Joanne Lockwood>about four or five years ago. And there was a certain part of

00:52:21.004 --> 00:52:24.634
<v Joanne Lockwood>this group of. We were in. Were talking about their broken noses, how they'd been

00:52:24.672 --> 00:52:28.278
<v Joanne Lockwood>in a fight and they had stitches and how they had this, and there's cotton

00:52:28.294 --> 00:52:30.234
<v Joanne Lockwood>one up their nose and all this kind of thing, and everyone's kind of going,

00:52:30.272 --> 00:52:33.726
<v Joanne Lockwood>oh, yeah, everyone's comparing their stitches and their broken noses in their

00:52:33.748 --> 00:52:37.306
<v Joanne Lockwood>fights. And I'm out literally a week later in Brick

00:52:37.338 --> 00:52:41.134
<v Joanne Lockwood>Lane with a group of women after a networking event. And we sat around

00:52:41.172 --> 00:52:44.754
<v Joanne Lockwood>the table and they were comparing stitches that they'd had after

00:52:44.792 --> 00:52:45.810
<v Joanne Lockwood>childbirth.

00:52:48.390 --> 00:52:52.066
<v Joanne Lockwood>It was both talking about stitches, both talking about that pain, the

00:52:52.088 --> 00:52:55.042
<v Joanne Lockwood>opposite ends of their bodies. I just found that

00:52:55.096 --> 00:52:58.822
<v Joanne Lockwood>contrast, that irony in being in the same location, having

00:52:58.876 --> 00:53:02.374
<v Joanne Lockwood>two polar different conversations. Well, and having to have both

00:53:02.412 --> 00:53:05.400
<v Beth Sherman>conversations while eating a curry, which I think is really.

00:53:06.490 --> 00:53:10.074
<v Beth Sherman>That seems the biggest challenge of all. Could you all stop talking about

00:53:10.112 --> 00:53:12.220
<v Beth Sherman>blood and stitches while I'm trying to eat

00:53:13.790 --> 00:53:17.174
<v Beth Sherman>my chicken? But even ordering a curry in an all male

00:53:17.222 --> 00:53:20.634
<v Joanne Lockwood>group, it's, how hot can I get my curry and still eat

00:53:20.672 --> 00:53:24.014
<v Joanne Lockwood>it in an all female group? It's the

00:53:24.052 --> 00:53:27.486
<v Joanne Lockwood>flavours and the aromatics and the

00:53:27.508 --> 00:53:31.146
<v Joanne Lockwood>blends and it's a much more sort of delicacy in the food that's

00:53:31.178 --> 00:53:34.978
<v Joanne Lockwood>eaten. So it's a complete difference in dining out as

00:53:34.984 --> 00:53:38.802
<v Joanne Lockwood>well. Yeah. In that example, anyway, it's almost an issue

00:53:38.856 --> 00:53:42.674
<v Beth Sherman>of confidence because the guys are sort of.

00:53:42.712 --> 00:53:46.406
<v Beth Sherman>It's sort of one up in. Or how do I measure up? And also,

00:53:46.508 --> 00:53:50.226
<v Beth Sherman>if they're broken noses from fights, then it implies

00:53:50.258 --> 00:53:53.974
<v Beth Sherman>that there's a story behind it or at some point, they are in

00:53:54.012 --> 00:53:57.786
<v Beth Sherman>some way seeking out danger or pain. But

00:53:57.808 --> 00:54:01.466
<v Beth Sherman>with women, nature provides us

00:54:01.488 --> 00:54:05.146
<v Beth Sherman>enough pain as it is. So it's pain that we have to

00:54:05.168 --> 00:54:08.966
<v Beth Sherman>deal with, but we're not going out trying to. It's

00:54:08.998 --> 00:54:12.846
<v Beth Sherman>bad enough that there's enough pain involved in childbirth. I don't need

00:54:12.868 --> 00:54:16.074
<v Beth Sherman>to go out and get stitches that aren't

00:54:16.122 --> 00:54:19.310
<v Beth Sherman>necessary, that I could avoid.

00:54:21.010 --> 00:54:24.590
<v Beth Sherman>It is an interesting way of seeing the world. Well, Beth,

00:54:25.010 --> 00:54:28.286
<v Joanne Lockwood>it's been a laugh again. I've really enjoyed this and I've

00:54:28.318 --> 00:54:31.998
<v Joanne Lockwood>laughed with you today, at you today. And you've

00:54:32.014 --> 00:54:35.598
<v Joanne Lockwood>laughed at me as well, which is fantastic. No, I've laughed with you. No one's

00:54:35.614 --> 00:54:39.426
<v Beth Sherman>laughing at anyone. And the fact that we've done this

00:54:39.448 --> 00:54:42.694
<v Joanne Lockwood>twice now, I feel privileged to have had actually a different

00:54:42.732 --> 00:54:46.434
<v Joanne Lockwood>conversation. This is largely a different conversation than the one we had before. So it's

00:54:46.482 --> 00:54:50.214
<v Joanne Lockwood>absolutely brilliant. So hopefully the listeners have got something

00:54:50.252 --> 00:54:52.906
<v Joanne Lockwood>out of this as well. So how can people get hold of you and do

00:54:52.928 --> 00:54:56.746
<v Joanne Lockwood>a bit of a pitch, your website, your LinkedIn address, whatever, on

00:54:56.768 --> 00:55:00.534
<v Joanne Lockwood>LinkedIn. Well, I'm Beth Sherman. It's https://bethsherman.com. I'm on LinkedIn. I'd

00:55:00.582 --> 00:55:04.246
<v Beth Sherman>love to connect with anyone who would like to. You know, I

00:55:04.288 --> 00:55:07.566
<v Beth Sherman>speak about humour as a tool for quick connection, and humour

00:55:07.748 --> 00:55:11.582
<v Beth Sherman>is a tool for workplace balance, for life balance,

00:55:11.636 --> 00:55:15.474
<v Beth Sherman>tool for leadership. Just really the ways that people can use

00:55:15.512 --> 00:55:19.138
<v Beth Sherman>humour to be closer to one another and

00:55:19.224 --> 00:55:22.718
<v Beth Sherman>to put themselves in a position where their messages, whatever

00:55:22.894 --> 00:55:26.198
<v Beth Sherman>message it is, whatever action they need people to take, it's

00:55:26.364 --> 00:55:29.698
<v Beth Sherman>more effective. So if that's speakers,

00:55:29.794 --> 00:55:33.382
<v Beth Sherman>if that's leaders, whatever form it takes. But

00:55:33.436 --> 00:55:37.270
<v Joanne Lockwood>bethsherman.com, bethsherman.com,

00:55:37.420 --> 00:55:40.950
<v Joanne Lockwood>it's been an absolute honour. Thank you. And a huge thank you

00:55:41.100 --> 00:55:44.826
<v Joanne Lockwood>for listening, for tuning in, for getting to the end. I

00:55:44.848 --> 00:55:47.878
<v Joanne Lockwood>take my hat off to you for getting to the end. Thank you. If you're

00:55:47.894 --> 00:55:51.510
<v Joanne Lockwood>not already, then please do subscribe 'Inclusion Bites Podcast'. If you're listening on Apple

00:55:51.590 --> 00:55:55.358
<v Joanne Lockwood>podcasts or Spotify, then please give us a, like, give

00:55:55.364 --> 00:55:58.974
<v Joanne Lockwood>us a five star rating, drop some comments in there, share the

00:55:59.012 --> 00:56:02.622
<v Joanne Lockwood>link with your friends, something to listen to on a long train

00:56:02.676 --> 00:55:33.030
<v Joanne Lockwood>journey or when you're working out at the gym. So please do share this. I

00:56:05.956 --> 00:56:09.678
<v Joanne Lockwood>have more guests, number of other guests lined up over the next

00:56:09.684 --> 00:56:13.438
<v Joanne Lockwood>few weeks and months. This is episode 104. As I said earlier, I want

00:56:13.444 --> 00:56:17.174
<v Joanne Lockwood>to get to episode 200 at least, so there's plenty more material coming out

00:56:17.212 --> 00:56:19.958
<v Joanne Lockwood>there. And of course, if you'd like to be a guest, I'd love to have

00:56:19.964 --> 00:56:22.182
<v Joanne Lockwood>you on the show. So please do drop me a line to

00:56:22.236 --> 00:56:26.050
<v Joanne Lockwood>jo.Lockwood@seechangehappen.co.uk. And

00:56:26.130 --> 00:56:29.798
<v Joanne Lockwood>finally, my name is Joanne Lockwood. It has been an absolute

00:56:29.884 --> 00:56:33.410
<v Joanne Lockwood>pleasure to host this podcast for you today. Catch you next time. Bye.
































